Log in | Register
« first < prev Page 3 of 360 next > last »
fp909
Apr 22, 2024 - context

we've had this discussion before, but yes

finally a photo that does a little showing:

check out the wharf--even the eye test you can see that the right side kind of swoops up into her thigh.

second is the building on the right, you can see the roof angling down--the other building is flat and right next to it, and neither are close enough to the vanishing point (and are not even facing in that direction) for there to be an angled roof.

we've suspected for a while based on the size of her waist in many photos, and have deleted a bunch of them.

Apr 22, 2024 - context

That doesn't quite look right to me but I'm no expert either

cgsweat
Apr 22, 2024 - context

I'd like to open a thread about fictional characters, which by current definition can't go into fiction (as I'm not posting a story), nor non-fiction (because I'm posting about women who aren't real).

Where should it go?

You can post your thread to wherever you think it best fits and we'll move it if there is a more appropriate section for it. Keep in mind there is also an Off Topic section (newly added since the original post to this thread).

Apr 22, 2024 - context

I'd like to open a thread about fictional characters, which by current definition can't go into fiction (as I'm not posting a story), nor non-fiction (because I'm posting about women who aren't real).

Where should it go?

Animated characters? https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/forum/thread/...

Live action characters? Forum search for the name. Someone else has probably discussed it too.

Apr 22, 2024 - context

I'd like to open a thread about fictional characters, which by current definition can't go into fiction (as I'm not posting a story), nor non-fiction (because I'm posting about women who aren't real).

Where should it go?

Chainer
Apr 22, 2024 - context

chipperpip's post is no longer relevant because we used a different naming system at the time that had limitations and worked differently from the current one.

The way to split these profiles is to manually rename two of the women to a different name. This could be by adding an instagram handle to the end, like "Sydney Smith (instagramhandle)" or by adding a middle name. This won't transfer the subs, but such is life.

Chainer
Apr 22, 2024 - context

Specifically her waist?

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/?name=...

I've been getting a lot of reports of her pics and they do look unnatural but I haven't found any obvious signs of morphing. Would anyone care to take a closer look?

Chainer
Apr 21, 2024 - context

especially considering that I've seem more than a few pics/videos on this site, where the woman shown was less muscular than the both of them

This line of reasoning comes up often enough that I made a post addressing it.

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/forum/thread/...

Apr 21, 2024 - context

I think it's passable in terms of muscularity, you can definitely see some muscles on Bianca especially. The thing is, it's a low quality video - blurry, low framerate, and you never really get a great view of Bianca. The thumbnail is literally the best angle you get.

So what it comes down to is that there's so much better content of Bianca already on the site that I don't see why we need this video in particular. I wasn't the one who rejected it, but this is my reasoning for not restoring it.

I get your reasoning, but I just thought that both of them were muscular enough, especially considering that I've seem more than a few pics/videos on this site, where the woman shown was less muscular than the both of them. And yeah there is better Bianca content on this site, but I thought that this video did a decent job of showcasing Liv as well, who I think has some solid muscle here, and in general. Anyway, I can't control what's allowed, and these are just my opinions anyway.

Chainer
Apr 21, 2024 - context

I think it's passable in terms of muscularity, you can definitely see some muscles on Bianca especially. The thing is, it's a low quality video - blurry, low framerate, and you never really get a great view of Bianca. The thumbnail is literally the best angle you get.

So what it comes down to is that there's so much better content of Bianca already on the site that I don't see why we need this video in particular. I wasn't the one who rejected it, but this is my reasoning for not restoring it.

Apr 21, 2024 - context

Agree. These women are muscular for sure, not roided up bodybuilders, but not meatless chickens either

The one on the right, Bianca Belair, is actually a bodybuilder I heard, if I'm not mistaken. It's not a great angle for her here, but if u search her up, you'll see how muscular she is. I definitely think they both have enough visible muscle here. Anyway, can I post the video here since it got deleted?

Apr 20, 2024 - context

This is the thumbnail for a video that got deleted. I think it's enough muscles for both women, but I'm curious what you guys think. Let me know if I have permission to post the video here if u guys want to see it.

Agree. These women are muscular for sure, not roided up bodybuilders, but not meatless chickens either

Apr 20, 2024 - context

This is the thumbnail for a video that got deleted. I think it's enough muscles for both women, but I'm curious what you guys think. Let me know if I have permission to post the video here if u guys want to see it.

Apr 20, 2024 - context

I haven't seen any women here yet! So unfortunately I don't think they would.

[deleted]
Apr 19, 2024 - context

Would that be too much to ask?

Apr 19, 2024 - context

For my money, this mystery girl is the genuine article -- she's quite a beauty, AND her muscles really pop!

Apr 18, 2024 - context

That + colour fill the star in yellow if you've already favourited that image.

Apr 18, 2024 - context

Hi there,

A feature that I'd like to request for the Advanced Search functionality is a button to click that chooses "Favorited by" to my user account.

Currently, if I click a model's name, for instance, and I want to see which images I've favorited from that model, I have to type my username into the field. A small inconvenience, yes, but a little button to click that selects "Favorited by: me" would be a nice, small bump in usability.

Thanks!

Apr 17, 2024 - context

There is a Self-Promotion section in the forum.

Is it busy though? I'm not sure why I would check out the Self-promotion section, as I'm not looking to spend any money. But I'd like to see more GWM in forums and comments sections and not relegated to a subsection of the forum.

I think anything that allows the girls to market themselves or just interact more on this site would lead to less blacklisting. I think they leave for three reasons: either they don't like the simpy comments, or the main two are money and lack of control/support. There is a lot of potential money for them to make from their followers here. If they are leaving, it's because they think they are LOSING money to this site, when this site should be making them money (at least indirectly). So copyrighted content (onlyfans, etc) needs to stay off of the site, or we will keep losing more high profile women.

They want to engage with sites/apps that allow them to market themselves how they want. One idea would be for verified GWMs to have an option that only they can post content about themselves. Or that all content posts have to be verified by them, allowing them to be their own moderator in a sense. That gives them direct control to avoid their paid content getting on this site.

I think some girls stopped interacting here because of the tolerance in the comments for constant arguments about "is she natty" and the uncomfortable simpy comments. This site is way better about gross comments than it used to be, but it still feels like a site for dudes to find girls' pics and comment about them, rather than a site where the women are integrated into the site culture. That feeling of a site run by and for men doesn't make as much sense in 2024 as it did back in the day. If we can remove some of the negativity that GWM face, especially about juicing, that would help.

We have seen over the years that GWM flourish on TikTok, Instagram, OnlyFans, etc largely because they were happier running their own business. The whole growth of GWM recently and more women getting strong is because they are building a new bodybuilding subculture rather than relying on the old male dominated BB culture. Now they make their own money rather than being paid by dudes to "be sexy" in a studio setting. So that's how we got all this new jargon like "muscle mommy" and "pump cover" and these cutesy, girly takes on traditional bodybuilding lingo. They have come up with all kinds of new content, so I feel like they have proven they know best about what content should be made and where it should be posted. Maybe they should have more input into how the site works. I think the site has some awesome features now, so I'd like to see more effort put into making it a site that works for the GWMs too.

Apr 17, 2024 - context

I like it when they have funny or edgy user names instead of their real ones

Apr 17, 2024 - context

I was wondering what was going on because her real name used to be there. It’s just weird referring to a woman as “Lean Meat.” Normally, that sort of thing would get you into trouble 😂.

Chainer
Apr 17, 2024 - context

This was a request by proxy that herbiceps told me she made to them. Please stop trying to change her name back to her real name (although I understand it is tempting).

« first < prev Page 3 of 360 next > last »