They look fit but not muscular, and this site is about that second thing...
Interesting that you delete some of these images but leave others of the same women still up there. what exactely are the criteria?
There aren't "criteria". It's about value add to the site.
Things that detract from an image are anything under the "strongly discouraged" section of the upload rules. Additionally, images of women that already have many pics on the site are also low value.
Things that add value are basically the opposite of that.
The less value an image adds to the site, the more likely it is to be deleted. If a particular woman has, for example, 100 very similar, mediocre pics on the site, each one of those has a higher than average chance of deletion. This is especially true for new, similar uploads. However, it's likely that not all of these will be deleted, possibly because the mod going through them subjectively thought some were worse than the rest, and there was still some value to having some of them remain on the site, just not the previous clutter of redundant pics.
Interesting that you delete some of these images but leave others of the same women still up there. what exactely are the criteria? Seen smalltown TV presenters nobody outside the US knows about with less muscle on here than some of the women you just deleted. You are a community site surviving by community contribution. Some of these images have been u for a year, and yet suddenly someone went through and deleted a heap of images i had uploaded...
Who does all the deleting of images for "Not enough visible muscularity." Seems somebody went on a hating spree and deleted a whole bunch of images I uploaded, even though a lot of them are with a muscle, or images of a woman from a different angle. Maybe I speak for myself, but I for one enjoy having different views of the same woman, not just all huge beef shots. This kind of arbitrary deleting does make it discouraging to upload content.
Who does all the deleting of images for "Not enough visible muscularity." Seems somebody went on a hating spree and deleted a whole bunch of images I uploaded, even though a lot of them are with a muscle, or images of a woman from a different angle. Maybe I speak for myself, but I for one enjoy having different views of the same woman, not just all huge beef shots. This kind of arbitrary deleting does make it discouraging to upload content.
Not sure how much bearing it has on subscriptions here but quite a few really hot looking girls are frustrating and she's one of them. All these 10 second teases and no substantial content.
We mostly only have their few second clips off Instagram or Tiktok - she has done a few short vids for Herbiceps but not much else.
So many others have never done a proper photoshoot or video session even though many of us would pay for longer content.
Kim Chartrand , for example, doesn't even have her own website or OnlyFans type link just a list of product affiliate links.
Good to hear! Obviously there is no deadline so it's nothing to be pressured about. But I do welcome anyone to step up and contribute their own lists. 🙂
On another note, it's interesting that Carolyn Marquez hasn't gained that many subscribers over a long period of time.
From the time of my first list over a year ago, she was the 8th most subscribed at 960. At the time I posted my last list, she had fallen to #21. Since then her subscriber count hasn't gained all that much.
Is she "old news?" What could be the reason for it?
She would probably be more popular if she posted stuff like other bodybuilders but most of her content is cross posted from TikTok, and it’s mostly ok at best. If she posted just straight posing photos and decent workout videos with no text that were more than 5 seconds long weekly she’d get more attention. And the more typical stuff is pretty good but no one’s getting off to 40 frames of a bicep flex
I’ll be doing another top 10 update this weekend. Another list I was thinking of making was to see who the biggest gainers are from update to update. That is gonna take a lot more work but I will try…
Good to hear! Obviously there is no deadline so it's nothing to be pressured about. But I do welcome anyone to step up and contribute their own lists. 🙂
On another note, it's interesting that Carolyn Marquez hasn't gained that many subscribers over a long period of time.
From the time of my first list over a year ago, she was the 8th most subscribed at 960. At the time I posted my last list, she had fallen to #21. Since then her subscriber count hasn't gained all that much.
Is she "old news?" What could be the reason for it?
I feel that’s a safe assumption too cg, I think Jordynne is going to get some more looks here very soon.
I’ll be doing another top 10 update this weekend. Another list I was thinking of making was to see who the biggest gainers are from update to update. That is gonna take a lot more work but I will try…
I've noticed that when a newer picture gets merged into my older one, my 'Total score received' drops a bit. In the second post in this thread, Chainer explained what happens to the scores, but I guess in the real world the two merged pics will often have some duplicate favorites. I guess those are deduplicated, but how exactly those this affect the scores of both uploaders?
Log in |
Register
They look fit but not muscular, and this site is about that second thing...
There aren't "criteria". It's about value add to the site.
Things that detract from an image are anything under the "strongly discouraged" section of the upload rules. Additionally, images of women that already have many pics on the site are also low value.
Things that add value are basically the opposite of that.
The less value an image adds to the site, the more likely it is to be deleted. If a particular woman has, for example, 100 very similar, mediocre pics on the site, each one of those has a higher than average chance of deletion. This is especially true for new, similar uploads. However, it's likely that not all of these will be deleted, possibly because the mod going through them subjectively thought some were worse than the rest, and there was still some value to having some of them remain on the site, just not the previous clutter of redundant pics.
facial looks aside they look like very normal women. nothing about them screams "i spend significant time in the gym".
it's likely that one or two cameup or were reported after seeing your upload history. don't think of it as a targeted attack on your uploads.
Interesting that you delete some of these images but leave others of the same women still up there. what exactely are the criteria? Seen smalltown TV presenters nobody outside the US knows about with less muscle on here than some of the women you just deleted. You are a community site surviving by community contribution. Some of these images have been u for a year, and yet suddenly someone went through and deleted a heap of images i had uploaded...
Yeah, Hicksville Arkansas probably has a different definition of "normal girls" than from LA.
Amazing answer
Los Angeles
Where the hell do you live lmao
Can't say I disagree with those deletions.
tbh these kind of just look like normal girls.
Who is this? What is that post processing? Looks like ai art?
Not sure how much bearing it has on subscriptions here but quite a few really hot looking girls are frustrating and she's one of them. All these 10 second teases and no substantial content. We mostly only have their few second clips off Instagram or Tiktok - she has done a few short vids for Herbiceps but not much else. So many others have never done a proper photoshoot or video session even though many of us would pay for longer content. Kim Chartrand , for example, doesn't even have her own website or OnlyFans type link just a list of product affiliate links.
She would probably be more popular if she posted stuff like other bodybuilders but most of her content is cross posted from TikTok, and it’s mostly ok at best. If she posted just straight posing photos and decent workout videos with no text that were more than 5 seconds long weekly she’d get more attention. And the more typical stuff is pretty good but no one’s getting off to 40 frames of a bicep flex
Look at any woman's gallery and you'll see how many subscribers.
Surprised by some on the list. Out of curiosity, where do popular figures like Julia Föry land? Would’ve expected her up high
Good to hear! Obviously there is no deadline so it's nothing to be pressured about. But I do welcome anyone to step up and contribute their own lists. 🙂
On another note, it's interesting that Carolyn Marquez hasn't gained that many subscribers over a long period of time.
From the time of my first list over a year ago, she was the 8th most subscribed at 960. At the time I posted my last list, she had fallen to #21. Since then her subscriber count hasn't gained all that much.
Is she "old news?" What could be the reason for it?
I feel that’s a safe assumption too cg, I think Jordynne is going to get some more looks here very soon.
I’ll be doing another top 10 update this weekend. Another list I was thinking of making was to see who the biggest gainers are from update to update. That is gonna take a lot more work but I will try…
I have a feeling Jordynne Grace will be one to keep an eye on. She only cracked the list on my last update, and now she's at 1235 subscribers.
She plans on competing in bodybuilding in the next few weeks, so she'll be getting more shredded (and thusly more popular).
Hello and welcome.......enjoy
I have the impression something similar happens when I upload a new pic - my total score often drops by a few points.
Whenever this happens it triggers the score to "update" in which case points, coming from users who have since deleted their accounts, are removed.
I've noticed that when a newer picture gets merged into my older one, my 'Total score received' drops a bit. In the second post in this thread, Chainer explained what happens to the scores, but I guess in the real world the two merged pics will often have some duplicate favorites. I guess those are deduplicated, but how exactly those this affect the scores of both uploaders?
No
Has anyone else been experiencing the site being slow?
Chainer's opening post: NOTE: This thread is not for new tag suggestions!
¯_(ツ)_/¯