Log in | Register
Forum > Site Discussion > Thread

"Why was this pic deleted?"

« first < prev Page 21 of 21 next > last »
May 29, 2024 - permalink

Literally can't understand how this comes under nudity. I can select about 100s of posts which can be called nude in this website. Will you delete all of them too ??

tamarok
May 29, 2024 - permalink

I just looked and it was a video and the "adult content" part probably applies. The content also suggests it was probably from OF.

fp909
May 29, 2024 - permalink

Literally can't understand how this comes under nudity. I can select about 100s of posts which can be called nude in this website. Will you delete all of them too ??

she's quite literally grinding a pillow i don't see how that's not adult content

Chainer
May 29, 2024 - permalink

I can select about 100s of posts which can be called nude in this website. Will you delete all of them too ??

This argument comes up often enough that I wrote a post about it.

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/forum/thread/...

May 30, 2024 - edited May 30, 2024 - permalink

Just got this for a post that was online for 2 days already. Don't think it's right.

  1. Forum and images are 2 different crowds. There are people who almost exclusively browse the image part of the site as opposed to the text part. Hence, the many people who would be interested to see such a comparison would have never chanced upon it if it was posted in the forum (which they would rarely if ever visit). This is exemplified by the fact the comparison attained a score of ~100 and was on the high score section of the front page for >24h. It would never have received as much exposure or quality discussion had it been posted in the forum instead.
  2. There is a lot of noise in forum threads and no section dedicated to comparisons. In addition to (1), this makes it even more difficult for people interested in a comparison like that to find it in the first place. The comparison I made tagged the specific women, making it easy for the people interested in them to discover the related comparison
  3. Moreover this was a comparison of stats (height, weight, strength) and the each of the images were specifically selected for their similarities in pose, posture, camera angle and distance, footwear, etc to eliminate as many variables as possible to maximize objectiveness.

The typical forum "comparison" is completely non-scientific with random pics selected and a focus on opinions as opposed to appreciating the visuals and REAL stats of each woman. This latest forum comparison thread "Emma vs Emma" highlights the shortcomings I've pointed out https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/forum/thread/...

I think "comparisons" in the forum in their current state should rightfully stay in the forum. But if the comparison is a more direct one, with a focus on constants to make things as even as possible (e.g. not 2 randomly selected images of 2 different people side by side), then they deserve a place in images, tagged to the relevant women.

Appreciate you reading this post and considering what I've written. Thanks.

fp909
May 30, 2024 - permalink

Generally we do not do comparison posts to the gallery between different women. It turned into a weird “who do you think is bigger or stronger” thing.

If this was a before later that’s fine. But we stay away from peer comparisons unless they were already in the same picture. Also the women hate that shit

May 30, 2024 - permalink

Generally we do not do comparison posts to the gallery between different women. It turned into a weird “who do you think is bigger or stronger” thing.

If this was a before later that’s fine. But we stay away from peer comparisons unless they were already in the same picture. Also the women hate that shit

I see where you're coming from. Thanks for the response and clarity!

May 31, 2024 - permalink

What on earth does this mean?

fp909
May 31, 2024 - permalink

Sounds like it was reported as a Patreon exclusive, unless you can provide a link to a public (non paywalled, non membership) posting. Not sure why the mega link was included tho

May 31, 2024 - permalink

I found it on Reddit to be honest so I wouldn’t say that’s exclusive haha

May 31, 2024 - permalink

I found it on Reddit to be honest so I wouldn’t say that’s exclusive haha

Just because it was posted on Reddit doesn't mean it wasn't originally lifted from a pay site.

fp909
May 31, 2024 - permalink

Yeah unfortunately we kind of have to go on the word of people who do subscribe. I don’t see it on her IG. She has been particular aggressive with takedowns of her content online (it’s very hard to find the old videos that used to be posted all over the place from 6-7 years ago) so we’re not trying to run afoul

May 31, 2024 - permalink

Fair enough, just that I’ve never seen that reason for a deletion haha

tamarok
May 31, 2024 - permalink

It’s basically an image report message that was acted on.

2 days ago - permalink

You deleted my post saying it is from onlyfans even if Nataliya posted it on her twitter.

So now delete this video too as it is from onlyfans only. But I bet you won't.. https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/2192463/

fp909
2 days ago - permalink

its deleted now, so what's your problem?

« first < prev Page 21 of 21 next > last »