Forum
>
Site Discussion
>
Thread
Log in |
Register
How many pics is "plenty?" Those do seem to eventually disappear as more people understand that GwM isn't a porn site.
Just look at the artistic nude thread for instance. And that is just a fraction of them.
You may want to rethink that thought. There are 1,547,084 images/clips uploaded as of today. This number does not include many more posted on one of several thousand threads in the Forum. The number of separate entries on Artistic Nudes is not statistically significant.
My thought is real simple. Let the mods do their jobs. If somebody's picture gets deleted, there is no reason to get all butt-hurt and briefs into a wad. Simply re-upload it in the Forum, or upload a better picture/clip.
> "not nearly the most risque I've seen on the site....." > > It's risque enough that it belongs under NSFW in the Forum.
WHY? There are plenty of pics on this site where you can see nipples, and a lot of other things besides. In this pic you can't see anything.
Feel free to report them.
Please remember that with the privilege of self-approving of uploads, it meant there are a lot of images that haven't been caught by the mods. There are cases where we discover, after the fact, that a user has been uploading a trove of questionnable images, so we have to do a mass deletion. With the recent adjustments to the way uploads are handled, this should mean fewer new uploads should pass under the radar.
I posted this pic and it was deleted for “not enough visible muscularity”. Was reposted by someone else 2 days ago, over 50 favorites and counting. Make it make sense
WHY? There are plenty of pics on this site where you can see nipples, and a lot of other things besides. In this pic you can't see anything.
@uberbabesrule... thanks for the support... some of the pic I've seen on this site and this one gets plucked. It makes absolutely no sense Exactly as you said nothing is shown except some wet abs and some breast. It's so subjective... Should we re-look at every ab shot that has some underboobs showing?
"als think of the intent of the photo. it's not a progress photo"
WTF does that mean all the shots uploaded her are showing progress and there's no intent to be provocative and/or sexy? That's just disingenuous and frankly.....
Just confused to why the pic i posted was deleted and then the exact same pic wasn’t when it was posted again by someone else. Not complaining, just want consistency
I'm fine undeleting that one, which I just did.
some of the pic I've seen on this site and this one gets plucked.
I said it above but I can say it a few more times if it helps. This logic does not apply. We do not keep an image because there exist other more borderline ones on the site. We do not delete an image because we once deleted a less borderline one. We do not compare images in this way.
WHY? There are plenty of pics on this site where you can see nipples, and a lot of other things besides. In this pic you can't see anything.
This reasoning does not apply.
I can just keep saying it...
Just had three video uploads of Guo Hui removed, for dubious stated reasons:
Too much border
on two of them
Too much border; no screenshots or screen recordings
one one of them.
All of them were uploaded by herself and I copied them here unchanged, for one thing. None of them is a screenshot or screen recording. One has a weird grid overlay. Don't know why she did that but it was her, not a screen recording.
All of them have segments that are not the aspect ratio of the rest of the video - i.e. landscape portions inside a larger video shot in portrait mode. That is something she decided to do - but all of them include segments that have no border whatsoever. So to get around it we'd either have to cut out segments of her video or you throw the whole thing away.
Please reconsider these deletions, she has a lot of fans here and her stuff is very hard to capture off the Chinese internet.
I just went to look, I only saw 2 videos of her you had uploaded that were deleted (there was another one on the waitlist that I just now removed for similar reasons).
Neither of those 2 were very good, they at least needed the segments that were just tiny stills edited out. Luckily that was easy to do losslessly (see the "Trimming" section of that post) because of where the keyframes fell. Here are the edited versions, if you want to upload those instead:
just crop the videos to get rid of the black borders
one is clearly a screenshot video, you can see the bar at the bottom from the UI. its better to pull these down using a 3rd party program instead of screen record as it degrades the quality. but in general always crop stuff like that
EDIT: i answered and th epage refreshed but those shouldnt be video posts anyway since they're boomerangs. i know they download as video but just take a screencrab of that without your own phone interface.
Those aren't really boomerangs, just short clips (boomerangs bounce forwards and reverse through the same few frames a couple times). The first one is definitely better in video form, the second you wouldn't miss too much by extracting as a still, but I think is still preferable as-is.
Also, the issue with those originally wasn't borders around the main video portions, it was that a bunch of their runtime consisted of tiny still pics or other irrelevant smaller clips in the middle of the frame, those are the portions I cut out.
on second thought neither is better good in the original form--i would have cleared them either for too much border or highlight reel but she didn't bother doing any kind of confirm. bu the two second clip isn't really anything, and there' not too much going on in the longer one where iw ould say "wow i would love to save this as a video"
For some reason I missed some comments on the previous page of this thread.
Botkb12000:
Multiple pics not being posted and are new to site and excellent quality Says: Your upload below has been deleted: Too many similar images of the same person. These are new unseen pics on the site. Do you have an answer. Thanks
I have decided to reject all your Monica Martin uploads for the time being with that reason because because she already has 1,000 of them and the new ones you keep uploading aren't adding anything of value.
muscleflexin:
Still no reason?? What reasoning does apply?? I'm just trying to avoid wasting time, and an upload, in the future, by uploading something that won't pass the test. Unless it's just one person's subjective opinion.
The complaint that doesn't apply is: "You deleted this picture for nudity while there are other more risque ones on the site!"
This is because "are there more risque pics on the site" is NOT something I consider when deleting a picture.
Here are some things I might consider:
So when you complain saying "But look at these other pictures that are more risque than the one you deleted!" my response is "Yeah, I wasn't even trying to take that into account".
just crop the videos to get rid of the black borders
one is clearly a screenshot video, you can see the bar at the bottom from the UI. its better to pull these down using a 3rd party program instead of screen record as it degrades the quality. but in general always crop stuff like that
EDIT: i answered and th epage refreshed but those shouldnt be video posts anyway since they're boomerangs. i know they download as video but just take a screencrab of that without your own phone interface.
😑
As I said, 1) they are downloaded directly, as she posted them; my phone was not involved much less the interface of my phone. I used my PC web browser and the dev console to capture the media file urls and posted them, and 2) if you crop the borders you cut off a huge part of the frame when the video cuts to portrait mode.
In any case I'll post the snips chipperpip took, better than nothing. I don't care about getting credit for these but it's a shame not to have her amazing work on the site.
Now I'm really getting pissed off. I had my post of Ranya removed because of "not enough visible muscularity". However, CaptainCharisma's post of the exact same photo is still up. What gives??
Kindly restore both. https://www.instagram.com/p/C352KtwRj2H/?igsh...
If you aren’t linking their public source, in the first comment, we have to treat it as a private video or image. This is because we need to be careful with images from known paid content sites, otherwise the owners risk asking for a take down. If you don’t like the rules, then avoid images from those sites.
Now I'm really getting pissed off.
I'm curious exactly how you think this site works. Do you think there's some kind of paid staff who monitors all direct uploads 24/7, and also discusses every photo to make sure everyone has the exact same judgement of it? There's a few volunteer mods who help clean stuff up in our spare time when we have a chance or if we happen to catch something, and mostly rely on reports.
If there's something on the site you think doesn't belong, USE THE REPORT BUTTON. That's what it's for.
I know it's been said before, but once again, no one gives a shit who uploaded what. I barely even look at the uploader names when removing or merging things, because it's irrelevant.
How many pics is "plenty?" Those do seem to eventually disappear as more people understand that GwM isn't a porn site.