I only remember going there back in 2008 looking for a specific girl who did shows there (not sure if I'm allowed to mention her here on GWM). The site listed at what times she'd be online, but failed to mention what time zone it was talking about. When I asked the webmaster, he just told me I should hang around 24/7 or so.
I join a number of sites once every few years for a month on a rotating basis. I grab all the updates and then disappear again and come back later. That's the best way to get it all in the cheapest way I find. I like to at least do some small part to keep the business alive, but only to a point.
Sometime between the last time I joined and this time, the management overhauled the site and cheapened it considerably. I think what they did was split the former MS into now two separate sites and split the content in half or worse as well. There used to be many full, large photo galleries there. Most have been replaced by small 10 image galleries and many of the old ones are gone completely, probably now on the other site. It seems what they're doing now, is dolling out the old photos 10 at a time and calling them weekly updates, when in fact they are not updates at all, the old MS had them all already on the site. I was pretty disgusted with the whole thing.
2 years ago I would have said yes, for the monthly fee it was worth the money to join for 30 days. There is no way I could recommend Muscle Sensuality now. You may have heard good things about the site in the past, that's all gone now. Save your money.
Site before 5 months, which on this case do not know where the problem Do you have a video of the site I'm at the video for some women bodybuilders can send you video Sexy or Nude
Hello I want to Join Active www.bettyviana.net I own a MasterCard credit card What do I do the site does not work, is there a problem Active Please help and thank you
The bikini clips are kind of cheap (mostly 2 and 4 credits) but the ffb clips (and I only checked a few)... 6 to 8 credits a clip. If I spend 20 dollars for 40 creds I can only get about 6 to 8 clips it just feels like you're trying to slowly bleed me to death by poking me with a needle but I like the needle Grin. If I felt like I was getting more bang for my buck (which I don't have a lot to spend) I'd jump right in like. Instead of saying spend $25 for 60 credits save $5 have something like $25 for 60 credits get 10 extra credits free
How do you know? If that's really the case he should at least put up a message or send an email to members, to let them know. Anyway even if it's hacked it shouldn't take more than a few hours to fix, unless he was stupid and had absolutely no backups.
The site seems to be gone. I hope he doesn't just run off with the money, since I had an active subscription.
Anyway the problems just persist. I resubscribed to the site after about a year of absence, and I could download all the new clips in a few minutes. And the resized/blurry photos just keep coming. He just cuts out a small piece of a photo resizes it and posts it as a new one, it's worthless.
Compared to some female muscle sites, the videos and photography look fine to me. To me his models are more attractive than you see elsewhere. Some of the models are great like Lorena Cozza. It's not a great value, but I'd consider signing up.
a lot of people are still stuck on the downloads so i'll see if we can figure out a way to add downloads and still keep the prices low...
we were hoping with the huge popularity of netflix streaming and other similar services and the increase of mobile use were downloading isn't a good option people would be ready for streaming only but maybe not yet...
as for the content itself we're going for more of a "maxim meets fitness girls" type look so they didn't look so hard... so it might not be for the hardcore muscle fan but might be well suited for the more general fitness girl fan??
we're just trying to do our thing and stay afloat while delivering a quality user experience so feedback like you gave is super important to dial in the product!
thanks,
mark
Streaming is a deal-breaker for me. Here is the deal: Streaming sites compete with regular tv channels, while downloading sites compete with DVD/Bluray purchases. I wouldn't pay for a regular tv channel either that's showing your content. (Well maybe if I were able to record the broadcast without quality loss, but then we are back at downloading again)
And I think you misunderstood me, my problem is not with the models, but with the way they're videographed. All the details are washed out, it almost feels cartoony. It's a waste of HD resolutoin if you're going to blur out everything anyway.
Especially since many of the models on your site have posed nude in the past. Once a girl has gone nude, I don't think most people are interested in seeing them in a bikini again.
Also, it would be nice to see a more detailed description about the amount of nudity contain in each video / picture set.
For example:
- Implied Topless
- Topless
- Fully Nude
- Explicit (close-up / legs spread)
- Etc.
- is the navigation clear and easy to use? can you find what you are looking for?
- did the site load quickly? did the photo previews and video previews all load and play quickly?
The overall look, feel, and functionally of the site is excellent.
One suggestion is to do away with the "Censored - Too Hot for Preview" on the videos previews. The banner and the blurred effect makes it very difficult to tell how much nudity the video actually contains, which for me is definitely a determining factor when purchasing.
- is it clear how the site works using credits to "unlock" content and store it on the cloud so you can access it anytime from anywhere on any device?
- is there anything specific that would stop you from making a purchase?
For me, these two questions go together.
The main drawback with your site is the "credit-based" payment system, which is always terrible for customers. It's pretty much a no-win situation:
- either you "overpay" by purchasing more credits than you need
or
- you "lose" money because your stuck a few remaining credits, which means you have to buy more credits ... and so on and so on.
This is good for you as the site owner, but is clearly not a good deal for the customer. So it seems a bit disingenuous to say "YOU ARE ONLY BILLED ONCE" and "NOTHING MORE TO PAY" when obviously that is not really true. Given a choice, no one is going to pick buying "credits" over paying the exact dollar amount. If you put out a good product, people will to pay for it. There's no need to play silly pricing games.
In fact, entire "play-per-item" pricing model is far more expense for customers, especially compared with sites that charge monthly subscription. Your "Credit Packages" are a perfect example this. For $50.00 (after a $50 discount) a customer receives "200 Credits" and can access selected content and nothing more. On the other hand, they could join a subscription-based site and get access to the entire members section for about half of that price. And "NOTHING TO CANCEL" does not work as a selling point. If this is really an issue, just offer a monthly membership option that does not automatically renew. Problem solved.
a lot of people are still stuck on the downloads so i'll see if we can figure out a way to add downloads and still keep the prices low...
That seems like a bit of a specious statement. Being that you model is "cloud-based" (i.e. streaming), it would use far more bandwidth having someone continually streaming the same video over and over when compared to downloading it a single time. So it doesn't make sense that making videos "downloadable" would increase the prices. In terms of bandwidth usage, allowing downloads should save you money, especially in the long run.
Log in |
Register
Sometime between the last time I joined and this time, the management overhauled the site and cheapened it considerably. I think what they did was split the former MS into now two separate sites and split the content in half or worse as well. There used to be many full, large photo galleries there. Most have been replaced by small 10 image galleries and many of the old ones are gone completely, probably now on the other site. It seems what they're doing now, is dolling out the old photos 10 at a time and calling them weekly updates, when in fact they are not updates at all, the old MS had them all already on the site. I was pretty disgusted with the whole thing.
2 years ago I would have said yes, for the monthly fee it was worth the money to join for 30 days. There is no way I could recommend Muscle Sensuality now. You may have heard good things about the site in the past, that's all gone now. Save your money.
http://www.musclesensuality.com/
Do you have a video of the site
I'm at the video for some women bodybuilders can send you video
Sexy or Nude
Website does not open and I am your mother MasterCard credit card
Do you have the site open.
What do I do the site does not work, is there a problem Active Please help and thank you
Anyway the problems just persist. I resubscribed to the site after about a year of absence, and I could download all the new clips in a few minutes. And the resized/blurry photos just keep coming. He just cuts out a small piece of a photo resizes it and posts it as a new one, it's worthless.
Since Tammy Jones has put her blog "private", forcing us to pay Tribute to read it, could anyone recomment it?
Whats the current Content?
and yes, would LOVE Adult content :)!
Streaming is a deal-breaker for me. Here is the deal: Streaming sites compete with regular tv channels, while downloading sites compete with DVD/Bluray purchases. I wouldn't pay for a regular tv channel either that's showing your content. (Well maybe if I were able to record the broadcast without quality loss, but then we are back at downloading again)
And I think you misunderstood me, my problem is not with the models, but with the way they're videographed. All the details are washed out, it almost feels cartoony. It's a waste of HD resolutoin if you're going to blur out everything anyway.
No.
YES, always YES.
Especially since many of the models on your site have posed nude in the past. Once a girl has gone nude, I don't think most people are interested in seeing them in a bikini again.
Also, it would be nice to see a more detailed description about the amount of nudity contain in each video / picture set.
For example:
- Implied Topless
- Topless
- Fully Nude
- Explicit (close-up / legs spread)
- Etc.
The overall look, feel, and functionally of the site is excellent.
One suggestion is to do away with the "Censored - Too Hot for Preview" on the videos previews. The banner and the blurred effect makes it very difficult to tell how much nudity the video actually contains, which for me is definitely a determining factor when purchasing.
For me, these two questions go together.
The main drawback with your site is the "credit-based" payment system, which is always terrible for customers. It's pretty much a no-win situation:
- either you "overpay" by purchasing more credits than you need
or
- you "lose" money because your stuck a few remaining credits, which means you have to buy more credits ... and so on and so on.
This is good for you as the site owner, but is clearly not a good deal for the customer. So it seems a bit disingenuous to say "YOU ARE ONLY BILLED ONCE" and "NOTHING MORE TO PAY" when obviously that is not really true. Given a choice, no one is going to pick buying "credits" over paying the exact dollar amount. If you put out a good product, people will to pay for it. There's no need to play silly pricing games.
In fact, entire "play-per-item" pricing model is far more expense for customers, especially compared with sites that charge monthly subscription. Your "Credit Packages" are a perfect example this. For $50.00 (after a $50 discount) a customer receives "200 Credits" and can access selected content and nothing more. On the other hand, they could join a subscription-based site and get access to the entire members section for about half of that price. And "NOTHING TO CANCEL" does not work as a selling point. If this is really an issue, just offer a monthly membership option that does not automatically renew. Problem solved.
That seems like a bit of a specious statement. Being that you model is "cloud-based" (i.e. streaming), it would use far more bandwidth having someone continually streaming the same video over and over when compared to downloading it a single time. So it doesn't make sense that making videos "downloadable" would increase the prices. In terms of bandwidth usage, allowing downloads should save you money, especially in the long run.