The situation is really sad. Over the past week, none of my publications from my waitlist have been added. There are posts on my waiting list that I uploaded in May, lol.
Thanks for updating the list. It can serve as a good example of varying tastes among the GwM membership. For me, I have more than a passing interest in only 7 of the 32; and some I pay no attention to at all. Of the 7, I am subscribed to only 1, but subscribe to a couple more not on the top list.
not surprising to see Slava rocket up the list as she's now pumping out content in the shape that people love her in.
Zafirova has been putting out slightly better photos. Same with Blakelee.
I few names are v high but I haven't seen much from Mendoza or Serros in the way of traditional muscle pics recently. Or perhaps I haven't been paying attention.
As with previous lists, these names are sorted by their numbers of subscribers from highest to lowest (1,000+). The number of subscribers is represented in bold font, after their country code (country of residence). The italicized number after that, beginning with the '+' symbol, is how many new subscribers they've gained since the previous list. The number in parenthesis in front of their name is their placing on the previous list. As you can see the placings of the top 5 have not changed.
The average subscriber gain was about +60 (1549 / 26 = 59.58), so you can use this number to determine whether each name is gaining at a rate above or below par. Names marked with "N/A" simply means that they did not appear on the previous list, and I have no way of knowing what their exact subscriber counts were on that day at that time.
Aside from that I think it's worth pointing out that Melinda Lindmark has the biggest jump in placement by far, considering she wasn't on the previous list at all and now in her first appearance she's at #13. Other notable jumps include Amazona from #17 to #12 and Emma Hartley from #9 to #6.
Side note: Technically Julia Masina and Ranya Dally are tied for 31, but due to the constraints of this site's default "numbered list" setting, they cannot share the same number.
=========
EDITS
=========
07/23/22 - Forgot to add Irina Pimenova's name. She's #29 on the list now.
08/06/22 - Adjusted Amazona's name and link to match her recent name change on the site.
08/15/22 - Removed Eun Hee Kang's name from the blacklist.
Example I just encountered:
I have 2 uploads, I upload the wrong URLs by mistake, I subsequently delete the two bad uploads. I am now 2 uploads down for the day and did not get to post anything since I deleted them.
Uploads are not always successful for various reasons. It would be nice to be given a second chance after doing the right thing and deleting the post yourself, and not waiting for a mod to delete it.
Soon I am sure, you are very beautiful and seem to have a fun personality Cristina. Keep it up and before long you will be living at the top of the high score section I am sure.
It's gotten alot better but once upon a time the comments section was filled with things like "boing", "I jacked off to this pic", "Pick me up and crush me", "Take steroids and get even bigger", and "come to Lorain and have a beer with me". Many women post these pictures/videos on Instagram, Facebook, Tik, Snap, etc for personal motivation, to get sponsors, etc and not for people to gawk over.
I agree with this. A lifetime ban is silly.
I miss the guy from Lorain, Ohio. He was always inviting people to his house.
I don't propose permanent blacklisting because I find it annoying that women change their minds. I support them having control over their content, especially after hearing about the stalking that Michelle Gavin experienced.
But that exactly is the issue - if a model goes through the trouble of emailing this site with a takedown request, chances are they have damned good reasons to.
Those reasons don't simply go away, at least most of the time. Women who choose to come back have ulterior motives, and just don't have respect for the community - look at Jessica's comments. They shouldn't be given the limelight and a free pass with that attitude.
While I agree that there are some women who definitely don’t respect and look down on schmoes as a superiority complex or whatever, I think there is irony in talking about how they don’t “respect the community,” when, for as much fetishizing as I see towards these women from schmoes, I also see an incredible amount of disdain towards them. With the kinds of comments that I see toward muscular women, I am not surprised why so many have a less-than-favorable view of schmoes.
And I see nothing wrong with promoting OF, or sex work in general. Hell, if I could make money off of my physique, I would probably do it.
I'm not sure I understand why models ask to be blacklisted in the first place.
If you're putting tons of pictures of yourself online, it seems to imply that you want them to be seen. If you have a pay site or OnlyFans, posting your pics here can only help drive tremendous traffic to you and make you money. This is arguably the most significant fan site for this "genre" on the Internet.
Unless people are posting paid content here or you are the type of person who has their social media completely locked down and you don't want any photos shared, it really makes no sense.
I guess I understand some women not wanting what they see as "unflattering" pics posted here, so why don't we just give them veto power over pics they want to delete here?
For the record, I've never seen a pic or video of Jessica Sestrem that I didn't think was sexy as hell and extremely flattering, so it's hard to imagine that was a reason for her to blacklist. I don't think you could take a "bad" photo of her if you tried. Unquestionably one of the finest women around the whole scene. It's a shame she doesn't want to be here. I feel like having her content here is like thousands of dollars worth of free promotion to exactly the audience she wants to reach with OF, pics or videos for sale. Seems like a no brainer to me.
I also disagree with the "lifetime blacklist" idea. It seems petty and vindictive to me. Yeah, it's annoying if women come and go, but I'd rather that than to not have them here at all and it's their prerogative at the end of the day.
The rules here aren't based on logic, they're based on simping.
I'm not sure I understand why models ask to be blacklisted in the first place.
It's gotten alot better but once upon a time the comments section was filled with things like "boing", "I jacked off to this pic", "Pick me up and crush me", "Take steroids and get even bigger", and "come to Lorain and have a beer with me". Many women post these pictures/videos on Instagram, Facebook, Tik, Snap, etc for personal motivation, to get sponsors, etc and not for people to gawk over.
I also disagree with the "lifetime blacklist" idea. It seems petty and vindictive to me.
I also disagree with the "lifetime blacklist" idea. It seems petty and vindictive to me. Yeah, it's annoying if women come and go, but I'd rather that than to not have them here at all and it's their prerogative at the end of the day.
I don't propose permanent blacklisting because I find it annoying that women change their minds. I support them having control over their content, especially after hearing about the stalking that Michelle Gavin experienced.
But that exactly is the issue - if a model goes through the trouble of emailing this site with a takedown request, chances are they have damned good reasons to.
Those reasons don't simply go away, at least most of the time. Women who choose to come back have ulterior motives, and just don't have respect for the community - look at Jessica's comments. They shouldn't be given the limelight and a free pass with that attitude.
I ask all members here to show a bit of respect. Jessica is frustrated with a missing feature, so has decided not be part of this community for the time being. I’d ask you all to accept this and not make the situation worse by name calling or putting her down.
That being said, we appreciate that this technical limitation (not being able to upload iPhone video recordings) bothers a few people, but given that GWM is being developed by a single person, who also has a day job, I’d ask everyone have a bit of patience with features. Sites like Instagram, Tik Tok, Facebook and Tumblr have teams of developers with at least 10-20 paid developers minimum, doing it as a day job, and even then features can take months.
It’s sad that there are many visitors to the site who can’t appreciate how much work developing a website is, but then again not everyone has spent time writing code.
I'm not sure I understand why models ask to be blacklisted in the first place.
If you're putting tons of pictures of yourself online, it seems to imply that you want them to be seen. If you have a pay site or OnlyFans, posting your pics here can only help drive tremendous traffic to you and make you money. This is arguably the most significant fan site for this "genre" on the Internet.
Unless people are posting paid content here or you are the type of person who has their social media completely locked down and you don't want any photos shared, it really makes no sense.
I guess I understand some women not wanting what they see as "unflattering" pics posted here, so why don't we just give them veto power over pics they want to delete here?
For the record, I've never seen a pic or video of Jessica Sestrem that I didn't think was sexy as hell and extremely flattering, so it's hard to imagine that was a reason for her to blacklist. I don't think you could take a "bad" photo of her if you tried. Unquestionably one of the finest women around the whole scene. It's a shame she doesn't want to be here. I feel like having her content here is like thousands of dollars worth of free promotion to exactly the audience she wants to reach with OF, pics or videos for sale. Seems like a no brainer to me.
I also disagree with the "lifetime blacklist" idea. It seems petty and vindictive to me. Yeah, it's annoying if women come and go, but I'd rather that than to not have them here at all and it's their prerogative at the end of the day.
I never changed anything I was always black listed I just made the account because of Tre my good friend , since I was never able to post anything from iPhone files I decided to delete everything
I want to have control of my own stuffs that’s why
Annoying it’s your ass speaking bullshit without knowing me Lol
Just made this account answer , thanks everyone to supporting and for the love keep following me for new updates somewhere else
Xoxo
Holy. I didn't notice this, I assume this was her account.
Editing to remove inflammatory wording. I have already stated my opinion.
Log in |
Register
The queue is not the same as the waitlist...
The situation is really sad. Over the past week, none of my publications from my waitlist have been added. There are posts on my waiting list that I uploaded in May, lol.
Very surprised that Jodi Boam isn't even CLOSE! I guess because she's not been that active in the last few years. Hopefully that'll change!
Slow gains? 😁 Definitely nothing slow about her physical gains. She's blowing up right before our eyes. 🤯
Thanks for updating the list. It can serve as a good example of varying tastes among the GwM membership. For me, I have more than a passing interest in only 7 of the 32; and some I pay no attention to at all. Of the 7, I am subscribed to only 1, but subscribe to a couple more not on the top list.
She blew up very fast but she's been making slow gains lately. She might appear on the list by late Aug. or Sept.
EDIT: For those who missed it, the updated list is here.
Thanks I was just looking at her page, I'm going to update the list.
Update: already passed the mark!!! 🎉
I'm proud of her haha
Scarlett should be popping up on the list soon...
not surprising to see Slava rocket up the list as she's now pumping out content in the shape that people love her in.
Zafirova has been putting out slightly better photos. Same with Blakelee.
I few names are v high but I haven't seen much from Mendoza or Serros in the way of traditional muscle pics recently. Or perhaps I haven't been paying attention.
Most Subscribed Names:
Analysis and Explanation:
As with previous lists, these names are sorted by their numbers of subscribers from highest to lowest (1,000+). The number of subscribers is represented in bold font, after their country code (country of residence). The italicized number after that, beginning with the '+' symbol, is how many new subscribers they've gained since the previous list. The number in parenthesis in front of their name is their placing on the previous list. As you can see the placings of the top 5 have not changed.
The average subscriber gain was about +60 (1549 / 26 = 59.58), so you can use this number to determine whether each name is gaining at a rate above or below par. Names marked with "N/A" simply means that they did not appear on the previous list, and I have no way of knowing what their exact subscriber counts were on that day at that time.
Aside from that I think it's worth pointing out that Melinda Lindmark has the biggest jump in placement by far, considering she wasn't on the previous list at all and now in her first appearance she's at #13. Other notable jumps include Amazona from #17 to #12 and Emma Hartley from #9 to #6.
Side note: Technically Julia Masina and Ranya Dally are tied for 31, but due to the constraints of this site's default "numbered list" setting, they cannot share the same number.
=========
EDITS
=========
07/23/22 - Forgot to add Irina Pimenova's name. She's #29 on the list now.
08/06/22 - Adjusted Amazona's name and link to match her recent name change on the site.
08/15/22 - Removed Eun Hee Kang's name from the blacklist.
Example I just encountered: I have 2 uploads, I upload the wrong URLs by mistake, I subsequently delete the two bad uploads. I am now 2 uploads down for the day and did not get to post anything since I deleted them.
Uploads are not always successful for various reasons. It would be nice to be given a second chance after doing the right thing and deleting the post yourself, and not waiting for a mod to delete it.
Soon I am sure, you are very beautiful and seem to have a fun personality Cristina. Keep it up and before long you will be living at the top of the high score section I am sure.
May j interest you in Modesto, CA?
Well it's no Solon but it has it's charms.
found out a guy at my gym just opened and OF like 3 days ago. get that bag, brother.
It's even funnier if you've ever been to Lorain. No one would go there on purpose.
I miss the guy from Lorain, Ohio. He was always inviting people to his house.
While I agree that there are some women who definitely don’t respect and look down on schmoes as a superiority complex or whatever, I think there is irony in talking about how they don’t “respect the community,” when, for as much fetishizing as I see towards these women from schmoes, I also see an incredible amount of disdain towards them. With the kinds of comments that I see toward muscular women, I am not surprised why so many have a less-than-favorable view of schmoes.
And I see nothing wrong with promoting OF, or sex work in general. Hell, if I could make money off of my physique, I would probably do it.
The rules here aren't based on logic, they're based on simping.
It's gotten alot better but once upon a time the comments section was filled with things like "boing", "I jacked off to this pic", "Pick me up and crush me", "Take steroids and get even bigger", and "come to Lorain and have a beer with me". Many women post these pictures/videos on Instagram, Facebook, Tik, Snap, etc for personal motivation, to get sponsors, etc and not for people to gawk over.
I agree with this. A lifetime ban is silly.
I don't propose permanent blacklisting because I find it annoying that women change their minds. I support them having control over their content, especially after hearing about the stalking that Michelle Gavin experienced.
But that exactly is the issue - if a model goes through the trouble of emailing this site with a takedown request, chances are they have damned good reasons to.
Those reasons don't simply go away, at least most of the time. Women who choose to come back have ulterior motives, and just don't have respect for the community - look at Jessica's comments. They shouldn't be given the limelight and a free pass with that attitude.
I ask all members here to show a bit of respect. Jessica is frustrated with a missing feature, so has decided not be part of this community for the time being. I’d ask you all to accept this and not make the situation worse by name calling or putting her down.
That being said, we appreciate that this technical limitation (not being able to upload iPhone video recordings) bothers a few people, but given that GWM is being developed by a single person, who also has a day job, I’d ask everyone have a bit of patience with features. Sites like Instagram, Tik Tok, Facebook and Tumblr have teams of developers with at least 10-20 paid developers minimum, doing it as a day job, and even then features can take months.
It’s sad that there are many visitors to the site who can’t appreciate how much work developing a website is, but then again not everyone has spent time writing code.
I'm not sure I understand why models ask to be blacklisted in the first place.
If you're putting tons of pictures of yourself online, it seems to imply that you want them to be seen. If you have a pay site or OnlyFans, posting your pics here can only help drive tremendous traffic to you and make you money. This is arguably the most significant fan site for this "genre" on the Internet.
Unless people are posting paid content here or you are the type of person who has their social media completely locked down and you don't want any photos shared, it really makes no sense.
I guess I understand some women not wanting what they see as "unflattering" pics posted here, so why don't we just give them veto power over pics they want to delete here?
For the record, I've never seen a pic or video of Jessica Sestrem that I didn't think was sexy as hell and extremely flattering, so it's hard to imagine that was a reason for her to blacklist. I don't think you could take a "bad" photo of her if you tried. Unquestionably one of the finest women around the whole scene. It's a shame she doesn't want to be here. I feel like having her content here is like thousands of dollars worth of free promotion to exactly the audience she wants to reach with OF, pics or videos for sale. Seems like a no brainer to me.
I also disagree with the "lifetime blacklist" idea. It seems petty and vindictive to me. Yeah, it's annoying if women come and go, but I'd rather that than to not have them here at all and it's their prerogative at the end of the day.
Holy. I didn't notice this, I assume this was her account.
Editing to remove inflammatory wording. I have already stated my opinion.