Yeah, that's one of the purposes of that new feature, to expose the chronically negative types. The mods and I were brainstorming ways to combat 0-bombing, and this is one thing we came up with.
I believe a way to hide this would be appropriate, unless a users ratings were overly positive (9.5+) or negative (1.5 or less)
That way, guys who have an 8 average or so can decide if they want others to know or not, and we still out the people who just seem to slap 10s and 0s everywhere and don't take into account if they LIKE anything about the picture, or just the name. Like another poster said, an average rating of 9.99 is just as worthless as a 0.55.
MuscleAppeal.com has 50 images of Anna Watson. if you go to the home page on the right side bar at the top you will see muscle athletes. You can scroll down and find anna watson. Also we have posted her Twitter and Facebook and body space profiles. for her fans to connect with her.
If you do not allow to vote 0, the next number -1- will be the lowest rate. Then you can restart this top topic for the -1- votes.
There will always be a lowest number, but nobody deserves a zero. At least not anybody who has already been voted in through the moderation process. A zero vote is an ego vote. It's just an attempt to bring down a score and make your vote more important than anyone else's, and for what reason? If you don't like a picture, move on and find one that you do.
Are we talking about the picture of the woman standing on the lawn? If so, I'm one who wasn't sad to see it go. That got totally out of control, and I still don't understand what the mania was about.
Candace Bailey from attack of the show. I've seen pictures of her flexing but I've searched the main site in the forum and can't find them anywhere. Does anyone have pictures or links?
I was thinking about this myself. What if we had a new images system where for new uploads it would show ONE picture of the girl and than below it the number of new pictures that way we don't have to scroll through 500 pictures of the same girl.
So it would look like this: [picture of Rachel McLish] Rachel McLish Total # of pictures # of new pictures uploaded that day
It would be nice not posting all the pics of one woman at the same time and I dont see the point why considering the flood of older pics as spam any flood starts getting boring at a certain point if you are not a big fan of that particular girl
I for one appreciate all of biffers pics. They remind us of the truly golden years of female muscle! Instead of complaining we should be a grateful. :)
Biffer seems to be taking his status as a moderator to an extreme. On the one side, it's good that he is posting. But seeing all these pictures that are 20 years old and more is getting tiresome. A few pictures of each model in some sort of a "memory lane" exhibit would be good. But not the flood we've been getting.
Log in |
Register
Mozilla is also listing Girls with Muscle as a "reported attack page" and is denying me access.
That way, guys who have an 8 average or so can decide if they want others to know or not, and we still out the people who just seem to slap 10s and 0s everywhere and don't take into account if they LIKE anything about the picture, or just the name. Like another poster said, an average rating of 9.99 is just as worthless as a 0.55.
edit: I don't know why the screen shots aren't showing anymore. Alternate link: http://imgur.com/a/lMkfs
Biffer is just below 5,000 too.
Hope this helps
The Muscle Appeal
Muscleappeal.com
thats not from orkut.
There will always be a lowest number, but nobody deserves a zero. At least not anybody who has already been voted in through the moderation process. A zero vote is an ego vote. It's just an attempt to bring down a score and make your vote more important than anyone else's, and for what reason? If you don't like a picture, move on and find one that you do.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=39U-XEs9yHI
I've seen pictures of her flexing but I've searched the main site in the forum and can't find them anywhere. Does anyone have pictures or links?
So it would look like this:
[picture of Rachel McLish]
Rachel McLish
Total # of pictures
# of new pictures uploaded that day
and I dont see the point why considering the flood of older pics as spam
any flood starts getting boring at a certain point if you are not a big fan of that particular girl
just why limting it to her there are many woman that are flooded here.
It would be perhaps nice if the pics of the same model would be regropued under one slide per day.
She has so many pics on this site each day it's like spam.
McBitch wouldn't be in most peoples top 50 or even 100.
Biffer shouldn't be allowed to post hundreds of pics of this overrated woman.