The photos on those sites are 5 years apart, 2008 to 2013. Lots can change in 5 years, and to me it doesn't look like she's changed all that much, if it is the same woman.
I put the pictures side-by-side. Granting an age difference of 5 years, I would be 90% sure it's her. I'd bet a week's pay on that.
OMG !!! Thanks so much 'ra5cvigi' ! The 'Arm Wrestling Strength feat. Serenity and Chloe' is exactly the clip, my on September, 4th, 2015 found cutout is from !!! I will have to hope, someone is contacting me here, who has a possibility to order it for me / us - like the 'herbiceps' - pictures and - clips of Tina Gaita and Samantha Anne as well as all AW - and Flexing - videos of Leila Hazlett.
Sorry 'ra5cvigi', but in my opinion, it seems not to be her :( The one I look for, seems to have a bit less exercised and more natural body. Look yourself : http://www.herbiceps.com/menu/videoclippics/samanthaanneclips.shtml She looks so charming and with such a beautiful biceps ! I will have to look on to find someone to order me / us the videoclips, that 'herbiceps' offers ... Thanks.
So a full on battle of the celebrities in a no rules submission wrestling match in one corner we have model and bodybuilder Jodie marsh and the other bodybuilder and actor zac efron
Would that that were true, but it's not just the rules as given that people are following when moderating, they are adding their own preferences to the decision about whether to approve the image or not. They can do that in the rating system; it is not what the moderation system is for.
Thanks 'knocker' I already got this information, too. Unfortunately the video, whose cutout I found on September, 4th 2015 and which I look for, was deleted on 'youtube', some time ago. I don't have any idea, to find out, who the two girls are and where to get more information about the whole video ??? Too bad ... :(
Don't know about the rest, but Lusa is not the girl's name, it's the name of the mixed wrestling outfit she shoots for. LUSA entertainment I think is/was the name. I don't know much about it because it isn't my thing, so to speak. It may be defunct but you might find it if you look harder than the 30 seconds I spent looking for it.
I think a good solution is to make the minimum score be higher than a zero. A zero to me means that the image has no place on the website. Moderation of the images weeds out pics that don't belong, therefore there should be no image that makes it on the site that deserves a zero.
I say make the minimum score a 5 and strengthen the moderation section of the page, by making more people having to come to a consensus before the image is posted.
I've made this very argument in the past and have been ridiculed for it. I think if you raise the minimum score to a 3, you give much more of an equal weight to the lowest and highest scores. But some people can't deal with anything that isn't 0-10. Something like 3-10 blows their puny little minds.
I'm getting the same thing recently. The site status page says there are currently 1,146 pictures in the voting queue, and I'm pretty sure I haven't gone through anywhere near that many. It just keeps loading the same image on the moderation page no matter what I do. Does the site limit users to only voting on a certain percentage of the pictures in the queue or something?
EDIT: If it helps, I'm in Firefox 43.0.4 on Windows XP.
It is also implicit that if this site is for girls should not be admitted René Toney, and there is a rule that supports it. Is unjust that there is no a rule specifying that this site is for girls whit muscles and not for ordinary skinny.
But alas kakuzade René Toney is on the website. So if the fans of extreme bodybuilders get René Toney, I guess than fans of girls with less muscles should get theirs.
It's pretty clear, and explicit in the rules. YOU have very narrow ideas about what belongs here and what doesn't. You're entitled to your own tastes, but you're not entitled to impose them on everyone. If you want a narrower set of rules, go make your own site. Otherwise, use the rating system like everyone else does, and quit your crusade to censor every image that doesn't cater to your exact tastes.
The ideas aren't what's narrow, the rules have narrowed down the images that should be uploaded and people aren't following it. No one is looking to impose their tastes on anyone we simply just want to see the rules followed to keep things organized.
While I agree that we've been relaxing our standards quite a bit, that sure is not well-meaning participation.
I say we make the minimum a 5 and make more people have to vote on an image to make it on the website. Therefore any image that passes moderation has to be one that a lot of people agree on, therefore having a score less than 5 would be unnecessary.
Log in |
Register
I put the pictures side-by-side. Granting an age difference of 5 years, I would be 90% sure it's her. I'd bet a week's pay on that.
Thanks so much 'ra5cvigi' !
The 'Arm Wrestling Strength feat. Serenity and Chloe' is exactly the clip, my on September, 4th, 2015 found cutout is from !!!
I will have to hope, someone is contacting me here, who has a possibility to order it for me / us -
like the 'herbiceps' - pictures and - clips of Tina Gaita and Samantha Anne as well as all AW - and Flexing - videos of Leila Hazlett.
The one I look for, seems to have a bit less exercised and more natural body.
Look yourself :
http://www.herbiceps.com/menu/videoclippics/samanthaanneclips.shtml
She looks so charming and with such a beautiful biceps !
I will have to look on to find someone to order me / us the videoclips, that 'herbiceps' offers ...
Thanks.
http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/2013-bodyspace-spokesmodel-samantha-ann-leete.html
http://clips4sale.com/7164
Jodie looks amazing in this pic.
I already got this information, too.
Unfortunately the video, whose cutout I found on September, 4th 2015 and which I look for, was deleted on 'youtube', some time ago.
I don't have any idea, to find out, who the two girls are and where to get more information about the whole video ???
Too bad ... :(
Good luck.
I've made this very argument in the past and have been ridiculed for it. I think if you raise the minimum score to a 3, you give much more of an equal weight to the lowest and highest scores. But some people can't deal with anything that isn't 0-10. Something like 3-10 blows their puny little minds.
The way it works is that a picture gets onto the site if 15 people vote "yes" on it before 15 people vote "no".
EDIT: If it helps, I'm in Firefox 43.0.4 on Windows XP.
But alas kakuzade René Toney is on the website. So if the fans of extreme bodybuilders get René Toney, I guess than fans of girls with less muscles should get theirs.
The ideas aren't what's narrow, the rules have narrowed down the images that should be uploaded and people aren't following it. No one is looking to impose their tastes on anyone we simply just want to see the rules followed to keep things organized.
I say we make the minimum a 5 and make more people have to vote on an image to make it on the website. Therefore any image that passes moderation has to be one that a lot of people agree on, therefore having a score less than 5 would be unnecessary.