"Why was this pic deleted?"

It should be the oppsite. If the model has a lot of pics, a pic not showing muscle does not add value to her presence here

But in this photo, a muscle group is clearly visible. And the clothes cover a lot but focus on and enhance the part they show, where what you see is not simply the abdomen of a thin but untoned woman.

My general guideline for judging pics for this site is that if abs are the only visibly muscular body part, they should at least have a fair amount of visible horizontal separation, not just vertical. You could make an argument for that one, but it's pretty borderline.

My general guideline for judging pics for this site is that if abs are the only visibly muscular body part, they should at least have a fair amount of visible horizontal separation, not just vertical. You could make an argument for that one, but it's pretty borderline.

Good grief, I had no idea you guys were this picky here.

Kestler was clearly an early 2000s baddie. Friends with Amy Peters. I just can't see the reason for rejecting that pic, so I won't be uploading any others.

chipperpip★:

My general guideline for judging pics for this site is that if abs are the only visibly muscular body part, they should at least have a fair amount of visible horizontal separation, not just vertical. You could make an argument for that one, but it's pretty borderline.

I rarely comment in this thread and only recall asking about rejections of my own uploads twice... Mostly I just occasionally read out of curiosity. I've seen you state this "general guideline" you follow before, and you word it clearly as not merely horizontal separation, but that it should be a "fair amount".

I'd think extending this same general guideline to the entire physique would inadvertently rule out a ton of off-season and strongfat images... Maybe it already does for all I know since I'm not privy to such behind the curtain mod actions.

I don't have a "dog in this fight", but I found it odd that everyone fixated on her abdomen instead of her upper pecs. Although it's only a thin sliver of exposure, her upper pecs have deep horizontal and vertical separation with depth. (And no, that's not her collarbones, her collarbones are just above.)

Since it's such a thin sliver of exposure, that might still disqualify it, but I think that's what should've been the deciding factor over her abdomen area (which does have minor horizontal separation, but it's hardly a "fair amount".

All right, fine, I restored it; partically because she doesn't have that many other existing pics.

Whats the logic behind removing these uploads given that the models posted them on their own public instagram?

We don’t know (we aren’t all knowing) that and you’re playing with fire every time you upload a photo related to a pay site. We delete them by default, to avoid any potential risk of upsetting a site that monetises photos it owns.

In the future add a link to where you got it from, in the first comment. It will give us better information when we make our judgement call (not all public photos were intended to be public by copyright owner).

Okay thank you will do that in the future.

Good grief, I had no idea you guys were this picky here.

Yes, we're somewhat picky about not having the site flooded with generic bikini/lingerie models with little muscularity, who would still be broadly popular because they're hot. Same with women who just have big butts.

I'd think extending this same general guideline to the entire physique would inadvertently rule out a ton of off-season and strongfat images

It's not inadvertent, yes it very much might depending on the woman's appearance in a particular upload. Looking more muscular in other uploads is irrelevant.

Since it's such a thin sliver of exposure, that might still disqualify it, but I think that's what should've been the deciding factor over her abdomen area (which does have minor horizontal separation, but it's hardly a "fair amount".

You're literally repeating what I already said in more words:

You could make an argument for that one, but it's pretty borderline.

I posted this vide yesterday as soon as I posted was deleted no apparent reason. Today someone else posted and it's ok. Also I lost my publication for the day at least if you don't accept my image give me back my publication slot for the day.

What is happening here?

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/2716021/

Looks like you had deleted, after having uploaded it, it per the log. I have restored it, in case it was a mistake on your part.

Thanks you are very kind