"Why was this pic deleted?"

And where did I say so? 🥴

I'm here just to get a fair explanation, why mine got deleted unlike the others...

Probably because they weren't reported - like every other time something is missed. Did you report them?

That's the funny part, it seems you have to bring things always here to expose those "unseen mistakes". No one wants the blame. If those reports were attended I wouldn't be here.

PS: they deleted two posts but no explanation why the remain is still consider muscular enough if my posts showed even leaner abs.

What does this even mean? lol

Snapshot from the same video:

What does this even mean? lol

Seems pretty obvious.

What does this even mean? lol

To add further to cgsweat's response, if were judging on the last frame (the one you shared) then it would be rejected on "not enough visible muscle". The rest of the video is as cgsweat presented.

Why were these videos of Mona Poursaleh deleted?

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/2705008/

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/2701485/

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/2696910/

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/2694131/

The account was an alt of someone who was using it to upload paysite content. It wasn't their first time. I nuked the entire account and all its uploads.

Curious why this one got deleted? https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/2705894/

Did you not read the notification?

Reason: Image report: Images of "Ashley (m0mmyashley)" are not allowed, possibly because they have requested

Haha guess I'll just talk to myself

Why did the first two uploads get deleted? She is clearly musculular (arms) and you can also see quads in the second one and calves. They have been on this site for at least a year too. Please restore if possible.

In the first one she only looks remotely big because her friend is skinny and in the second her calf is pressed against her other leg in a flattering but deceptive way. Nothing remarkable there regardless of how long the pics were up.

Why are some posts deleted for questionable quality and others are left up for definite low quality?

Why are some posts deleted for questionable quality and others are left up for definite low quality?

Thank you! Good point.

Why are some posts deleted for questionable quality and others are left up for definite low quality?

Because if they aren't reported the Mods don't see everything. You've been on this site for 15 years and still don't know that?

Because if they aren't reported the Mods don't see everything.

Don't understand this comment.

Don't understand this comment.

Read it very very slowly then.

Why are some posts deleted for questionable quality and others are left up for definite low quality?

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/comment/3573821/

I'm unsure why this pic was deleted for "too many similar images of the same person" when I don't see how out of the 22 total images she has, this one is too similar.

This image was deleted for "not enough visible muscularity"?

I can't comment on the first one, but for the second one it is pushing the line and it got cut. If you're uploading images that are challenging the upload rules, then expect a coin flip or rejection.

Nudity? You're so pervert, gentlemen

Nudity? You're so pervert, gentlemen

I just looked myself and that mesh bra doesn't really leave anything to the imagination.

Also, given the number of pictures you self-delete, because they didn't score high enough for your liking, you really shouldn't be worrying about rejections.

Not enough visible muscularity on Sheron Kestler?

In general yes, in that particular picture, not really.

When a model has several photos that clearly demonstrate her well-defined physique, and in one photo her clothing only reveals a specific area, and that area shows, as in this case, a toned abdomen even if not overly defined, the photo should be considered valid. This photo is very beautiful and belongs on GWM.