Well. i tried to post some great pics of Michelle Andrea a couple of time, without results. Quality is good, maybe it was because of the too much masculine look?
As promised in the other thread, I'll try to explain why each of these pics was rejected... or admit that it should have been accepted.
She's working out but there's not much visible muscle. Also she's in the corner of a pic whose quality is pretty crappy anyway.
Looks too masculine.
I could see an argument for too much of a masculine look - notice the sunken cheeks
Not a bad pic, though not much muscle besides the quads. Could have been accepted I guess.
Could see an argument for too much tan... but should probably have been accepted
Not much visible muscle.
No visible muscle, plus a bit too risque with the nudity.
Not muscular enough
Not muscular enough
Not muscular enough - athletic yes, but not really muscular
no visible muscle - she's all covered up!
Terrible image quality.
Not much visible muscle. Yes there's that calf, but besides that...
Not muscular enough.
Not muscular enough..
Should probably have been accepted... though the lack of face is annoying.
Not much visible muscle... one can tell she's athletic, but the (already pretty small) pic is zoomed out and because of the lighting she appears more skinny than anything else
This is a great picture. Should definitely have been accepted. Whoops...
Not muscular enough
Nice view, but not really much visible muscle.
Keep in mind that these are my opinions - I'm (probably) not the one who rejected most of these, and even if I did reject some, I can't remember, as there are too many pictures to go through. At least, I hope you understand better now...
Also, if anyone else wants to post rejected pics here for an explanation, feel free.
75. That's not very light, not if you're a 100 pound girl. We are used to looking at very muscular women here but they are the exception, not the rule.
Maybe.... Though I'm still left wondering why a lot of girls are shy about flexing/showing off/talking about their muscles when they clearly have some though they aren't in the fitness industry or whatever. Like this girl who I worked with a few years ago... Though she was slim, I had noticed some definition in her arms and shoulders. This one time she hops on the bus on the way to work and while hanging on to the bar for balance, her bicep popped out of nowhere! Though I knew she had some muscle, I didn't expect it to pop the way it did. I saw a few recent pictures of her lately and even though she doesn't workout, she had nice toned abs, calves and that same bicep popped out of her arm while she was pointing back at someone over her shoulder (the guy was behind her) and she wasn't even flexing! So I kinda joked around with her about it and she was really shy to talk about it and saying that she found it weird that guys like muscular girls and that usually it's the other way around.... Anyways, as you said ptr, at least I asked and someday we'll get something out of it. ;D
I did read it. And I can understand what you're saying. Yet I'm a fan of steroids AND their effects so some of them I liked. Regardless the book was so and so. Nothing fancy.
Never mind - at least you asked,who knows what lies ahead,when she is older and more self confident she might display her wares assuming she retains or improves on her physique
Too bad, no luck. She wnats nothing to do with it.... Why is it that even fit girls or natural ''girls next door'' with muscle are shy to flex and display their pictures?
Considering I spend alot of time of checking the main site using a cell phone(coz my lovely employer restricts internet usage to 5 mins a day)Iam happy to report the new server is going well-coz via phooe seems twice as fast,hope it will also make those 403 error messages a thing of the past too
Log in |
Register
Is that good, or do you really need resolution...?
But from a quick google search, you're probably right.
She's working out but there's not much visible muscle. Also she's in the corner of a pic whose quality is pretty crappy anyway.
Looks too masculine.
I could see an argument for too much of a masculine look - notice the sunken cheeks
Not a bad pic, though not much muscle besides the quads. Could have been accepted I guess.
Could see an argument for too much tan... but should probably have been accepted
Not much visible muscle.
No visible muscle, plus a bit too risque with the nudity.
Not muscular enough
Not muscular enough
Not muscular enough - athletic yes, but not really muscular
no visible muscle - she's all covered up!
Terrible image quality.
Not much visible muscle. Yes there's that calf, but besides that...
Not muscular enough.
Not muscular enough..
Should probably have been accepted... though the lack of face is annoying.
Not much visible muscle... one can tell she's athletic, but the (already pretty small) pic is zoomed out and because of the lighting she appears more skinny than anything else
This is a great picture. Should definitely have been accepted. Whoops...
Not muscular enough
Nice view, but not really much visible muscle.
Keep in mind that these are my opinions - I'm (probably) not the one who rejected most of these, and even if I did reject some, I can't remember, as there are too many pictures to go through. At least, I hope you understand better now...
Also, if anyone else wants to post rejected pics here for an explanation, feel free.
Like this girl who I worked with a few years ago... Though she was slim, I had noticed some definition in her arms and shoulders. This one time she hops on the bus on the way to work and while hanging on to the bar for balance, her bicep popped out of nowhere! Though I knew she had some muscle, I didn't expect it to pop the way it did.
I saw a few recent pictures of her lately and even though she doesn't workout, she had nice toned abs, calves and that same bicep popped out of her arm while she was pointing back at someone over her shoulder (the guy was behind her) and she wasn't even flexing!
So I kinda joked around with her about it and she was really shy to talk about it and saying that she found it weird that guys like muscular girls and that usually it's the other way around....
Anyways, as you said ptr, at least I asked and someday we'll get something out of it. ;D
Never mind - at least you asked,who knows what lies ahead,when she is older and more self confident she might display her wares assuming she retains or improves on her physique
Why is it that even fit girls or natural ''girls next door'' with muscle are shy to flex and display their pictures?
And the 'highest rating' gallery now updates in REAL TIME.
I approve.