Log in | Register
Forum > Site Discussion > Thread

"Why was this pic deleted?"

« first < prev Page 52 of 53 next > last »
Jul 22, 2026 - permalink

@pardusco. Is there a name to go with this picture?

I'm not a mod. But I'd be less inclined to report this photo for no muscle if there were other pictures of the model that show more muscle.

Jenna Reid (jennaareid3)

5 days ago - permalink

Sorry but you deleted this video of Sienna Marostica for little visible muscles, but abs and obliques are so evident, the quality of video is good and the model have only 8 upload. Possible restore it?

5 days ago - permalink

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/2831634/

As has happened before, this video is AI-generated.

5 days ago - permalink

Had an upload of Sandy Pacheco deleted. It should be hidden, not deleted.

tamarok
4 days ago - permalink

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/2831634/

As has happened before, this video is AI-generated.

Other people upload and mods need to deal with the nth copy. Just report it, and move on.

We don’t have any process to auto detect them, so depend on reports.

4 days ago - edited 4 days ago - permalink

tamarok★:

Other people upload and mods need to deal with the nth copy. Just report it, and move on.

We don’t have any process to auto detect them, so depend on reports.

Although it wouldn't work for videos like the one above, Chainer could use the Python ImageHash library set to exact matches to automatically hash images deleted for certain reasons, then detect image duplicates when other users upload the same thing and redirect them to a holding queue for mods to confirm for deletion. It wouldn't catch everything, but it would reduce workload on the mods which I've seen Chainer say is a priority.

Of course, he might've already implemented this exact type of automation already, but if not, it's one more way to help streamline the site internally.

One caveat would be if an image deleted for cause that gets added to the auto detection script is later restored. The restoration would need to automatically remove it's hash from the list.

Edit: Fixed my typo ImagaHash.

tamarok
4 days ago - permalink

This algorithm is used more on a nightly frequency, due to CPU load, and then mods are notified of dupes. I am not sure it accounts for deleted images, so that’s certainly a discussion that could be had?

4 days ago - permalink

Sorry but you deleted this video of Sienna Marostica for little visible muscles, but abs and obliques are so evident, the quality of video is good and the model have only 8 upload. Possible restore it?

Kindly, Can I have a reply?

Chainer
4 days ago - permalink

Kindly, Can I have a reply?

Yes. Not restoring it, too mediocre

2 days ago - permalink

Can this be restored so I can download it and increase contrast?

2 days ago - edited 1 day ago - permalink

Can this be restored so I can download it and increase contrast?

Here's a link you can use to download it:

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/full/Z...

I will say in general it's a remarkably bad idea to not have a local copy of anything you want to keep that you upload here, this site isn't a permanent cloud storage solution, and could go away tomorrow if Chainer decides he doesn't want to keep paying for the hosting.

2 days ago - permalink

Here's a link you can use to download it:

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/full/Z...

I will say in general it's a remarkably bad idea to not have a local copy of anything you want to keep that you've upload here, this site isn't a permanent cloud storage solution, and could go away tomorrow if Chainer decides he doesn't want to keep paying for the hosting.

There was also a video I uploaded of Anika Hinzer that got deleted under the unassumption that it was AI. It's a video from her IG, I dont believe it's AI.

tamarok
2 days ago - permalink

There was also a video I uploaded of Anika Hinzer that got deleted under the unassumption that it was AI. It's a video from her IG, I dont believe it's AI.

The only one I am seeing deleted of her, that you uploaded, was a self-deletion. If you didn't name her, then I'm not looking through the history.

1 day ago - edited 1 day ago - permalink

I just had four mixed wrestling photos with Lora Ottenad deleted because it was stated they were from a pay site. I copied from a general muscle site on IG and not from a pay site. They are freely available on IG and FB.

1 day ago - permalink

I'm not a mod, but I am the member who reported your four mixed wrestling photos in accordance with current site policy.

It doesn't matter where the pictures came from. They're still from a pay site and this particular site is active. I have a number of purchased photo collections and several videos on Premier Productions / Tough Girls that remain accessible.

If the policy has been changed, I'm OK with adjusting reporting.

1 day ago - permalink

I'm not a mod, but I am the member who reported your four mixed wrestling photos in accordance with current site policy.

It doesn't matter where the pictures came from. They're still from a pay site and this particular site is active. I have a number of purchased photo collections and several videos on Premier Productions / Tough Girls that remain accessible.

If the policy has been changed, I'm OK with adjusting reporting.

These photos are in the public domain. They should be restored. No need to be such a boyscout.

1 day ago - permalink

Scythian:

These photos are in the public domain. They should be restored. No need to be such a boyscout.

Go look up what "Public Domain" is and how that actually works because you clearly don't know.

1 day ago - permalink

I just had four mixed wrestling photos with Lora Ottenad deleted because it was stated they were from a pay site. I copied from a general muscle site on IG and not from a pay site. They are freely available on IG and FB.

Everytime I see photos like these I report. They are from paid fetish websites. Period. It's against the policy of GWM, so...

1 day ago - edited 1 day ago - permalink

@Phenoms: the gentle person you replied to might want to do some research also into copyright law in addition to your suggested public domain.

It's not a matter of being a "boyscout" or a "goody-goody." It's a legal matter.

1 day ago - permalink

PlutoFlyBy:

@Phenoms: the gentle person you replied to might want to do some research also into copyright law in addition to your suggested public domain.

It's not a matter of being a "boyscout" or a "goody-goody." It's a legal matter.

Agreed... Baby steps; one at a time.

1 day ago - permalink

"i gOt It ofdAinterNet so iT must be pUbLiC dOmaIN"

15 hours ago - permalink

Then there's the idiots who , having had a video deleted because its obviously just a talking head showing no muscles other than a jaw being exercised, then straight after post the same video again! https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/2834721/

15 hours ago - permalink

Just thought I would give a heads up that most of the videos or pictures of Lindsey Godfrey are made with AI. When I uploaded them to check, they show over 80% on one and over 90% on another video of hers. I've reported them yesterday and I know it takes time for mods to look it over.

14 hours ago - permalink

phillthedrill:

Just thought I would give a heads up that most of the videos or pictures of Lindsey Godfrey are made with AI. When I uploaded them to check, they show over 80% on one and over 90% on another video of hers. I've reported them yesterday and I know it takes time for mods to look it over.

You should be reporting those things on the Who else should be on the "soft" blacklist for self-morphing their images? thread.

Also, there isn't a GWM gallery for Lindsey Godfrey.

« first < prev Page 52 of 53 next > last »