Forum
>
Site Discussion
>
Thread
Log in |
Register
They were cam recordings and it had a bit of a doxxy feel where I'm not sure she wants to have her cam stuff linked to that name
I was wondering about that the other day. What's the general policy on cam session recordings that look like private one to ones that have been screen recorded then posted on here?
I was wondering about that the other day. What's the general policy on cam session recordings that look like private one to ones that have been screen recorded then posted on here?
Myself, I’m inclined to say they should be removed. Partly because private ones are often paid for and if they are not paid for did the model give consent for it to be public?
Myself, I’m inclined to say they should be removed. Partly because private ones are often paid for and if they are not paid for did the model give consent for it to be public?
That's what I basically think too, the privacy/consent issue and in a sense, if paid, it may be considered pay site content, either as a stream for several in a "chatroom" or an individual one to one, regardless of whether these often get uploaded to other sites. So should we be reporting these?
That's what I basically think too, the privacy/consent issue and in a sense, if paid, it may be considered pay site content, either as a stream for several in a "chatroom" or an individual one to one, regardless of whether these often get uploaded to other sites. So should we be reporting these?
Speaking for myself: I'm always reporting this type of content. Makes no sense to me to upload this type of video here.
> > The video is this you can see good calves ans also abs through clothes > >
> > Can I have a reply?
There are some good frames of muscle showing but it's like 10% of the video, I don't feel strongly enough to override the deletion
What??!! This video was not allowed it it's entirety??!!! I don't get it! Dumb decision!
This was via a report. Trying with some other "random" AI image validators, both zerogpt and deepai giving 75% liklihood.
We are getting a lot of AI images submitted and yes, some models are enhancing their images, whether via AI or morphing. For this reason our tolerance is going to be lower than you'd like, and there is only so much work we will do. We are already giving our time freely to help keep this site as a place worth visiting.
My recommendation for future images flagged as AI, is checking with some other validators before contesting. If we have to do this work for you then you'll have even less sympathy from the mods.
@S: I like your uploads and was having sympathy until I read: "although we all knew...."
Maybe change that to "I" instead of "we." Politely, I can speak for myself as I'm sure others can.
I mean why would she make an AI generated image if she has built an aesthetic body like that. Some moderators in this site literally lack brain as they are using a random ai detector to check the image although we all knew ai is not that much accurate till now...
This was via a report. Trying with some other "random" AI image validators, both zerogpt and deepai giving 75% liklihood.
We are getting a lot of AI images submitted and yes, some models are enhancing their images, whether via AI or morphing. For this reason our tolerance is going to be lower than you'd like, and there is only so much work we will do. We are already giving our time freely to help keep this site as a place worth visiting.
My recommendation for future images flagged as AI, is checking with some other validators before contesting. If we have to do this work for you then you'll have even less sympathy from the mods.
EDIT (For clarity)
Siddharth, I'm not sure why you think insulting the mods is going to help your cause.
Some moderators in this site literally lack brain
If you don't want your uploads flagged as AI enhanced, maybe stop uploading models known to AI enhance their own images like Sandy Pacheco (sandyfit.mx). She was already reported by PP1000 in the Who else should be on the "soft" blacklist for self-morphing their images? thread for exactly that, and is already on Chainer's radar. It's only a matter of time before she's put on the Soft Blacklist. I'm seconding PP1000's report that she's doing AI enhancement, and I don't need a detection tool to spot it.
If you genuinely think she isn't AI enhancing her images, you need to work on your ability to spot fakes. Look at her videos and compare them to her still images with perfect muscle definition. It's like looking at two different physiques.
She's attractive and has a nice body, but she's using AI to enhance her images beyond what she's accomplished in the gym.
I kindly request a moderator to review my deleted upload please. I think it showcases muscle through her skintight suit when she flex her back. There are numerous other videos that focus solely on a woman's butts without displaying any muscle at all. Thank you, and I truly appreciate the hard work you all put in.
I restored it because of the lats and the fact that she doesn't have many pics, however this:
There are numerous other videos that focus solely on a woman's butts without displaying any muscle at all.
Is not a valid point: https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/comment/3573821/
I sincerely thank you for restoring it I truly appreciate your efforts. I will keep this in mind moving forward. Thank you once more.
I am a mod, so this was a comment on the time we give to the site.
I was addressing Siddharth and my requote of his insult. I can see how my formatting and lack of name inclusion led to you reading it that way. Apologies for not being more clear.
I've edited that reply addressing Siddharth directly for clarification...
Siddharth, I'm not sure why you think insulting the mods is going to help your cause.
Some moderators in this site literally lack brain
@pardusco. Is there a name to go with this picture?
I'm not a mod. But I'd be less inclined to report this photo for no muscle if there were other pictures of the model that show more muscle.
Hehe what's this I say yes I say no going to solve? I say next