This is AI, please stop uploading it, I have deleted it at least 3 times

I seriously think this woman is not AI. On her TikTok she goes to the exact gym that I go to which checks out with her location being Amsterdam.

WTF is it with you people coming out of the woodwork claiming she's not AI? Do you need your brain checked?

The picture is watermarked with SynthID which tells you it was generated using AI.

The aforementioned tiktok doesn't even have any gym pictures.

I wonder if the person behind this is the same person behind "Kiki Charoen".

There are some similarities, including the odd Amsterdam connection, as well as various commenters claiming that they totally know her.

Nvm your right, other pictures are even more clearly AI.

All the weights are wrong

I seriously think this woman is not AI. On her TikTok she goes to the exact gym that I go to which checks out with her location being Amsterdam.

One could easily use prompts to have AI generate a specific location. One could also use existing pictures and modify them through AI. Recognizing a place depicted in an AI-generated picture does in no way establish that the person also depicted in that picture is in any way real.

I just had to report fake FBB "Ridhima Kapoor", the only upload by new user Aarush.

Confirmed AI Gen with SightEngine AI Detector. This user registered an account just to upload this fictional "Ridhima Kapoor" he generated on Nano Banana.

Even though the online detector is much more reliable, one could ask where the photographer / camera is in the reflection.

oriander2000:

Even though the online detector is much more reliable, one could ask where the photographer / camera is in the reflection.

I knew it was AI the instant I saw the thumbnail, but posting the detector results helps reassure people that have more difficulty spotting them.

It's this today's vibe everywhere that opinion and belief is stronger than the truth, that's why people can refuse to believe truth if it serves their own narrative, it's all about tribal behaviour now

Back in the last century people respected and wanted the truth now they refuse to even accept something is AI if it hurts their feelings and are let down when truth is revealed.

Glad we got chainer that doesn't succumb to such behaviour

It's like this, people often accept truth when it gives them a satisfying story, but resist actual truth when it takes the toy away like in this case being reposted.

What is the policy on AI upscaling and colourization?

Edit: Removed links to images.

What is the policy on AI upscaling and colourization?

We don't allow it. (On the main site I mean; it's welcome in the AI Gens section of the forum)

Well, there's the generally hard to believe size of the woman, as well as this having a very "Nano Bana Pro" vibe. The latter I can tell because I've used it myself quite a bit independently to generate images that are very similar, for example:

But there are also some details that are off, for example:

• Light green chair in the upper left that doesn't have a table
• A backpack close to that with no one there
• Messed up hands of the person behind the guy's head (right in front of his face)
• Overly red skin color of the guy who is struggling which has also bled into the woman's face color

Edit: If someone uploads this above pic I will break my nose when I bang my head against my desk

If it's a college setting, the chair and backpack are EASILY explained (trust me, kids leave stuff everywhere, and, move stuff.. worse than cats)

Run via google images: It's hard to say definitively if this image was generated or modified by AI.However, visual content analysis suggests that the image is highly likely to be real. The photograph captures a candid moment of casual arm wrestling, displaying realistic physical indicators that point toward authenticity:Authenticity AnalysisPhysiological Realism: The intense muscular engagement is naturally reflected in both individuals. The man's facial strain, redness, and neck tension are consistent with heavy physical exertion. The woman's forearm musculature shows realistic skin texture, contours, and a natural point of contact during a grip.Complex Interlocking Details: The hands are interlocked correctly without the anatomical anomalies, missing digits, or blending textures common in AI-generated imagery.Consistent Environmental Lighting: The lighting, background scenery (such as the school or corporate cafeteria seating), and reflections on the table all align naturally with a real-world setting.No SynthID Detection: Technical analysis confirms that no digital watermarks or standard AI generation tags from common models are present in the file metadata.

HOWEVER.... I've run some of my own photos through an AI detection, 97% certainty that the image was AI generated (It was of myself, taken from an old cell, and, dropped into paint, to convert to jpg vs whatever the old format was) Direct screenshot of the image ... aslo was 97% certain that I was AI. Oh, yah.. Simba (from Disney) was 82% certainty of being real.... As for this one... I'm not sure. I've had a VERY large friend in the past, 5'9" 285-315 range, depending on the season (she did farmhand work, warehouse work, and cycled. LOTS)

Hmm, watermarked with SynthID... Yah... I'll leave my post up, but, if it's watermarked... I agree with you. Don't reupload as real.

Edit: well, Google AI admitted it was outright LYING when I had it try to identify one of the plates on the left. Technogym, then Hammer Strenght. Kept telling me the curved text was a hallucination, due to motion blur... Sooo... yah.. There's that.