"Why was this pic deleted?"

I see the low quality versions are gone now too, lol. Well, that's another solution; please nobody.

I jest a bit, but yeah. The points are gone now anyway and reuploading would leave a bad taste in my mouth, so if you're not going to reinstate the collage then we may as well leave things as they are. In some strange way I feel content if none of these stay up.

Anyway, having to do this feels ridiculously silly, but here's the proof.

Again, you clearly care about quality uploads and we appreciate that.

I suggest uploading that midddle pic in the full quality that you have. We will take a look after that.

Take a look at what, exactly? The image resolution or something else?

Just upload the one that looks like it has the most muscle shown. At the same time they are kinda borderline IMO.

At the risk of sounding like a broken record...

Since the other two pics are also deleted and we're currently left with nothing, why not just compromise this one time and reinstate the triptych? I've duly noted that collages are unwanted by the mods so I won't be making more of them henceforth. That will be my takeaway from this, and the site gets a nice picture back. Everybody wins.

Why would this even be deleted? I wouldn't even call it a highlight clip. Also correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think "discouraged" means do not post

The 'blur background effect' makes them look that way.

Impressive how much time and dedication put the person who reported this picture to note this, yet he didn't take the same time and dedication to look at these pics from the same event.

Not to mention to check the ig post of the athlete where the pic was taken from: https://www.instagram.com/p/DV3ymzwlI1y/?img_...

Those "weird matching artifacts on their torsos" are big-ass medals.

The 'blur background effect' makes them look that way.

Impressive how much time and dedication put the person who reported this picture to note this, yet he didn't take the same time and dedication to look at these pics from the same event.

Not to mention to check the ig post of the athlete where the pic was taken from: https://www.instagram.com/p/DV3ymzwlI1y/?img_...

Yeah, I don't really see a reason not to restore that one:

Also correct me if I'm wrong but I don't think "discouraged" means do not post

"Discouraged" means if you upload something that fits that category it has a higher chance of getting rejected, and you shouldn't be too surprised.

I just saw that happy_ss13’s photos were deleted due to AI concerns, but even though some people seemed to agree in the comments that it was AI, I personally think it’s quite possible that it wasn’t AI for several reasons I’d already mentioned in a comment. Indeed, one might question this by comparing them to older photos on the Instagram account; however, the latest photos and videos where she is seen in short sleeves with normal arms date back to June 2025, and she was a bit on the heavier side. In all other photos and videos since then, she has always been dressed in long sleeves that fully cover her body, right up to the more recent images and videos where she is seen with a very muscular physique. it’s entirely possible that in over six months she could have cut down on body fat and gained some muscle mass if she’s been training seriously all this time, and maybe she was already training back then without it being noticeable. Furthermore, in all the recent images and videos showing her muscular physique, her muscles maintain the same consistency across all images and videos; this consistency is also visible in her veins. Such consistency is unlikely with AI.

There was this video of Amazonka flexing topless which I saw earlier today and it was deleted. Why?

I just saw that happy_ss13’s photos were deleted due to AI concerns, but even though some people seemed to agree in the comments that it was AI, I personally think it’s quite possible that it wasn’t AI for several reasons I’d already mentioned in a comment. Indeed, one might question this by comparing them to older photos on the Instagram account; however, the latest photos and videos where she is seen in short sleeves with normal arms date back to June 2025, and she was a bit on the heavier side. In all other photos and videos since then, she has always been dressed in long sleeves that fully cover her body, right up to the more recent images and videos where she is seen with a very muscular physique. it’s entirely possible that in over six months she could have cut down on body fat and gained some muscle mass if she’s been training seriously all this time, and maybe she was already training back then without it being noticeable. Furthermore, in all the recent images and videos showing her muscular physique, her muscles maintain the same consistency across all images and videos; this consistency is also visible in her veins. Such consistency is unlikely with AI.

There was this video of Amazonka flexing topless which I saw earlier today and it was deleted. Why?

It was reported as onlyfans content.

Goddamn. Should have downloaded a copy :(

It was reported as onlyfans content.

This is not her first enhanced pics she post.

I don’t generally have a good eye for this, but there are a number of models who morph their own images. I can’t say whether it is the case here, so I’ll let another mod comment on the specific case.

'Deleted for too much focus on butt'. I get it but there are countless posts on this site of skinny girls showing no muscle with only 'butt'. And she's a muscular girl not a stick insect like some. I mean are glutes not a muscle? Might wanna get rid of the glutes through clothes tag.

Same girl btw ⬇️

Same girl btw

That's irrelevant, the pictures are judged on an individual basis. And yes, there's a difference between obvious muscular glutes, and just a big butt. If you upload a picture visually indistinguishable from the latter, there's a good chance it will get rejected.

That's irrelevant, the pictures are judged on an individual basis. And yes, there's a difference between obvious muscular glutes, and just a big butt. If you upload a picture visually indistinguishable from the latter, there's a good chance it will get rejected.

I get it, i was just wondering why hulking figures such as the one below were admissable, but now i see your logically sound reasoning. Thanks for clearing that up 👍🏻

They're not necessary admissible - Mods don't see everything -they often rely on reports.

Also, though marginal, there's still more obvious hard definition in the glutes of the woman in that pic compared to the one you were complaining about, including a slight side indent.

I get it, i was just wondering why hulking figures such as the one below were admissable, but now i see your logically sound reasoning. Thanks for clearing that up 👍🏻

Quite honestly that's probably subject to a coin flip. If you post things in the discouraged section of the upload rules or things that are borderline then you may find judgements don't align. Just like judges at a body building competition, we may not always agree where that line is drawn.

Also, though marginal, there's still more obvious hard definition in the glutes of the woman in that pic compared to the one you were complaining about, including a slight side indent.

😂😂😂😂 You're right. I didn't have my glasses on.

What on earth does this even mean?

Digital Millennium Copyright Act - you can guess the rest...