Forum
>
General / Nonfiction
>
Thread
Log in |
Register
She looks great to me.
In my experience, people who ask questions like this to an audience are looking for validation to go ahead but have already made a decision to proceed.
They've done the self-convincing and now just want the external validation to prove themselves correct.
If it was for competition, then you can make a case for it but if not then why bother? She really does look fantastic as she is. I'd be reluctant to change that formula if I was in her shoes, all things considered.
I think it's also done in an attempt to present themselves as "relatable" to their followers by pretending to be interested in their perspective. Furthermore, this is another method of them trying to convince their audience that they are natty by saying "I have hit my limit, should I take this other step," despite that more than likely she was already on PEDs to begin with.
No fitness influencer is reasonably going to take advice from their audience on whether to take PEDs or not. They won't because they are usually already on them, and if they weren't and wanted to they wouldn't need convincing from others to do it. It's clear that Kim has put a lot of hard work into her physique and that she knows what she is doing, but she is using the same tactics that every other fitness influencer uses to fuel viewer engagement.
Lol she has a different definitoons on "natty" She is probably at least on var since a couple of years, so should she try ped, tren or test now? Definitely yes. She is turning 40 probably had kids already so she should just go all in now
Exactly. Look at that most recent clip of her posing in the gym on her Instagram. She's freaking huge, with delts, pecs, and lats that no woman can achieve naturally. What she wants to know is how people would react to her getting mega big. She should just do it and see how far she can take her amazing body.
That's because "influencers" think that taking anavar still makes them natty.
The new trend I am seeing in fitfluencers, both men and women, is instead of the fake natty thing, they are admitting that they use, but that they use very very little, and that only recently have they started using them. I have seen a few male fitness influencers who "admit" to being on "TRT" but insist it's mostly their diet and training that made them look massive and shredded. The reality is that if you are on TRT on an actual therapeutic dose, you're not going to look like they are no matter what your diet and training routine looks like. More than likely they are blasting test way past therapeutic levels, along with taking other compounds, yet are claiming to only be on a TRT regime.
Again, not discounting Kim's obvious dedication and worth ethic to strength training, but no legit bodybuilder or athlete is going to post a question like that in good faith.
She’s amazing! Would be incredible to see her with more muscle and definition!!
She’s amazing! Would be incredible to see her with more muscle and definition!!
“To the office”. Again, why would you take something like that if you work a regular job? Isn’t taking an illicit substance like that a fireable offense, especially if the side effects become noticeable (roid rage, voice changing, etc.)
^ I think the employers usually test for weed and if she had her office job for a while then they would of tested her before they hired her. They don't want their employees high while working.
Yeah, but if someone starts obviously doing Meth, you’re going to act accordingly. One example, but any illicit substance.
“To the office”. Again, why would you take something like that if you work a regular job? Isn’t taking an illicit substance like that a fireable offense, especially if the side effects become noticeable (roid rage, voice changing, etc.)
I haven't been drug tested in the last four jobs I have had going back ten years. And for employers who do drug test, they only care about and test for recreational drugs (coke, meth, weed (depending on jurisdiction with more places legalizing cannabis.)) They rarely test for PEDs.
“To the office”. Again, why would you take something like that if you work a regular job? Isn’t taking an illicit substance like that a fireable offense, especially if the side effects become noticeable (roid rage, voice changing, etc.)
Alcohol isn't, to use your favorite word, illicit. But if you're drunk at work, you're going to get fired. Being jacked at work doesn't affect anyone, despite you sneaking in the "roid rage" reference implying bodybuilders attack on sight like 28 Days Later fast-zombies. If anything, it might make them better employees, depending on what they're doing. Rene O'Neil was an engineer at NASA. You think nobody noticed? Sorry, the world doesn't operate the way you want it to.
She looks great to me.
In my experience, people who ask questions like this to an audience are looking for validation to go ahead but have already made a decision to proceed.
They've done the self-convincing and now just want the external validation to prove themselves correct, as a form of justification.
If it was for competition, then you can make a case for it but if not then why bother? She really does look fantastic as she is. I'd be reluctant to change that formula if I was in her shoes, all things considered.