Forum
>
General / Nonfiction
>
Thread
Log in |
Register
Even at the highest level, a competitor is only at or near contest-shape a few weeks out of the year. All competitors spend far more time off-season than contest-ready.
If you're going to hold to so many of these conventional beauty standards, why not judge someone when she looks (what you feel is) her best?
Once again this is an opinion thread, so everyone’s scale will slide differently. So you shouldn’t be surprised that someone on the pole of the round scale doesn’t look conventionally hot to even the average muscle fan.
> > 😍😍 > > 1000% feminine and sexy for me
She's no longer "feminine." She's now ravaged by gear and her gear jawline is just ridiculous.
The interesting thing about her though is, in her offseason look and she has more body fat, she looks quite pretty. IMO.
She’s always had that jaw. When she’s done up, she’s a friggin’ sexpot
> Katelyn Winkler. > >
>
I second that and add another Winkler:
Great choice. She has the natural feminine Brazilian notorious physique.
Two come to mind. Carolyne Marquez right now and Penpraghai Tiangngok back at her biggest maybe around 2012 or so.
I love her, but she is a strong "no" to the question os this thread, especially with this photo. Maybe in a softer season of her, because she has a beautiful feminine face.
Just for clarification, do you guys factor having a nasty attitude into whether a woman has feminine beauty?
Only if I have a solid bead on what they are actually like, not their social media presence, or reports from one off (and especially weird) encounters.
For example, if I hear a bad report from a photographer I am disinclined to believe it, especially if I learn the woman declined to shoot with them. Or a fan that meets someone at an event and things are fine until they ask something weird af.
Only if I have a solid bead on what they are actually like, not their social media presence, or reports from one off (and especially weird) encounters.
For example, if I hear a bad report from a photographer I am disinclined to believe it, especially if I learn the woman declined to shoot with them. Or a fan that meets someone at an event and things are fine until they ask something weird af.
Your comment makes me think about that thread from awhile ago asking if people had any negative interactions with female bodybuilders.
In like 9 out of 10 examples, after reading the details about the encounter I'm like "ok, that makes sense why they were upset at you" lol
As long as they aren't bald and has visible beard it's okay for me. Some of those who are accused to have taken it too far wren't pretty in the first place.
Therefor I throw in Kristina Nicole Mendoza:
Great mention! She is definitely a good choice for her size.
> > 😍😍 > > 1000% feminine and sexy for me
She's no longer "feminine." She's now ravaged by gear and her gear jawline is just ridiculous.
The interesting thing about her though is, in her offseason look and she has more body fat, she looks quite pretty. IMO.
She always had this jawline even when she wasnt hitting so hard on ped's Anyway i find her very feminine even with her 100+kg of pure muscle
Congratulations to whoever brought Candy Canary and Denise Hoshor. I think the first one certainly fits this topic (Denise Hoshor had her moments, but I think that most of her competitive life average men wouldn't be attracted to her in the slightest). And I'm posting again because nobody mentioned this girls below:
Sherry Priami
Samantha Jerring
And from the vault...
Alina Popa
Heather Armbrust
Even at the highest level, a competitor is only at or near contest-shape a few weeks out of the year. All competitors spend far more time off-season than contest-ready.
If you're going to hold to so many of these conventional beauty standards, why not judge someone when she looks (what you feel is) her best?