"Why was this pic deleted?"

Are you insane? A lot of content here is NSFW, this is an adult oriented site and these pictures with class and refinement showcase an absolutly gorgeous female muscular physique.

clinically? no.

these photos are not on her subreddit (which hasn't been udpated in a year), and aren't from her IG. so where are they from? please produce a link.

It's a free herbiceps vod and not from any paysite. Kindly restore it. Thanks.. https://www.herbiceps.com/videos/93530

When you post stuff from the previews please note kt as a first comment too

At any rate you posted the row view video too which contains that image so not going to restore it for that reason

I can understand why it was deleted, but than this also needs to be deleted https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/2157595/

Just use the report button if you think an image needs deleting or has an issue.

come on man, this video (image is a preview) has Been removed because "Pictures focusing On butt and not muscles are discouraged" - get real, her legs are muscular and she is a bodybuilder and its obvious she has muscles and this video showed a different perspective, where her massive legs filled jeans. Reupload it, i Think almost 90 people who favirited her will also agree

Even if 500 people favourited a problematic photo it wouldn’t matter. Put any sufficient boob or butt in a photo and it will get votes, and quickly, even if there isn’t sufficient muscle shown. The mods have made their decision and indicated why.

I don't get why some guys get their panties all in a wad if one or a few of their uploads get deleted. Maybe they need to take a closer look at the Upload rules. Definitely not a life or death situation here.

I've never been a real frequent uploader and have probably deleted more of my own stuff than the mods combined, as my tastes change. Mods have deleted a few of mine for one reason or another. Yes, it's a little irritating, but I quickly recover and move on.

Are WPW pictures only allowed if they are cropped and do not show the watermark? Also are sample pics not allowed to be uploaded to this site? Both pictures shown are sample pictures from WPW website.

We don’t allow any image that is meant to be behind a paywall.

In certain cases we will make an exception if there is a link provided to the image source, if that link is to the public page of said website, where the image was found, or the image on the model’s own Instagram. Without this, we will assume the image was behind the paywall. The mods will get final say.

Removing watermarks is a definite no.

@a1bubbler26.... "Back in the day," I bought a lot of stuff from WPW and its companion site, Tough Girls. I can still access the materials; which are maintained on the sites within my account; since both sites are still active. The photography style is pretty obvious to me as a long time customer (altho not in recent years). I report them when I see them, on the premise that I paid cash for my WPW stuff. Why should somebody else get it for free; and yes, I'm well aware of Saradas, the pirate site.

@a1bubbler26.... "Back in the day," I bought a lot of stuff from WPW and its companion site, Tough Girls. I can still access the materials; which are maintained on the sites within my account; since both sites are still active. The photography style is pretty obvious to me as a long time customer (altho not in recent years). I report them when I see them, on the premise that I paid cash for my WPW stuff. Why should somebody else get it for free; and yes, I'm well aware of Saradas, the pirate site.

I too have membership with the website and have purchased everything Connie McCloskey (videos/photo sets). Any non member can click on either photo set of the above 2 pics, click on samples and see said photos and get it for free anyway. I can assure you that these pics are not courtesy of Saradas. Who knows, they might even be enticed into buying the photo set. There's actually a photo sets sale on at this very moment.

Aside from HB and HDP we try not to flood with freebie pics from other pay sites. They haven’t given permission and IIIRC some of gotten testy about it. A few is ok but since WPW tends to have a lot of free access photos and the paid ones have been out floating in some places for a while, but are still paywalled even now, we allow some but not everything

As I said on the Herbiceps forum, I PAID for their latest Anastasia Korableva VOD clip and have not been able to download the clip because when you click on the email link, you then have to log into their website to download it. After emailing them about this, all they did was send me the same link and therefore the problem has not been resolved. Whilst you are concerned about people getting freebie sample pictures from a paysite, I'm being fleeced of my cash because I do not receive a direct download link. Which is worse, 1 freebie sample pic or paying for a clip which you can't download?

That has nothing to do with us lol

Sorry to hear about your download & access difficulty. But must say that's between you and Her Biceps. Not really relevant to the current discussion.

Back to WPW et al for a moment. My feeling about paying customer vs. free stuff still stands and I will report WPW material when I see it, and when I have time. The mods have the "vision of the cosmic all" and I defer to them for decisions on what to delete and keep.

No paysite content is allowed. The only "freebies" that are allowed here are from whitelisted sites such as HB, and provided that the uploader links to where the image came from. WPW has not been whitelisted, therefore free samples are are not allowed.

@cgsweat, @fp909 thanks for the correction.

Apparently Nasim Shamlou-Juhola is blackisted but I got no warning when I searched or posted with that name.

I checked before I cleared them but she s listed under a couple of similar but different names (depending on where they were pulled from or who named them)

I checked before I cleared them but she s listed under a couple of similar but different names (depending on where they were pulled from or who named them)

Another one to add then, I suppose, it is the name used on Facebook, Reddit and that other awful forum beginning with S.

Another one to add then, I suppose, it is the name used on Facebook, Reddit and that other awful forum beginning with S.

It happens. One was from her old IG, and then she had a second IG for a while. I think one tag was from a site where she had comp photos posted so whatever name she registered under. Shame. She was a nice lady, we used r talk frequently and she sent me really great content. But she got really private during that so I’m not surprised.

I'm guessing those were added before we had the name merging system. I merged "Nasim Shamlou-Juhola" and the others into the main blocked name, and that seems to work ok.