Forum
>
General / Nonfiction
>
Thread
Log in |
Register
(307 total votes)
No because a lot of men like the idea that it's real .meaning there is a tiny chance they can experience it in real life. i noticed that I am more impressed with less impressive stuff if it's real while .i mostly like ai for more high fantasy content like true super human women lifting cars and stuff like that.
I'd like to say no but you look at where we are already and then think about 10 years from now. It's kind of scary. There already is an amount of realism to some of these pictures and videos were you can't always tell the difference between real and Ai. You imagine a world where you can just step in and it's your literal fantasy. Not many people are going to be able to deny themselves that. We might see a real problem with addiction. We have that now and we are nowhere near where it'll be in the future. Chatbots that are getting close to fooling people into thinking they are real people. Live video. Virtual reality glasses. We could have a real crisis on our hands. I say all that and am also like man I can't wait. LOL. I'm old. I'm not in the dating pool anymore. Let me have some fun.
No. It is not economical. The only reason ordinary people can afford LLMs now is because they're heavily subsidized. That will quickly end as generative video is a huge waste of compute.
Everyone on this thread is old and from a place called "Before World". Even if you're a full 30 years younger than I am, you're still old in this context.
As noted in that other thread, none of us has the lens of a 10-year-old who's grown up in an almost entirely digital world. What's "always better" for us may barely be a thing for the kid of today in 10 years from now.
It's my belief there will absolutely be a significant audience for AI-gen content.
I think AI will be more popular due to people being able to put their own fantasies into an AI script with it generating it for them. It'll be the same thing for movies & TV shows. You can make your own Sequel Trilogy, new Star Trek with the original cast, etc.
not really..full sensory experience remains the best… will it be achieved?.. since just creating videos was unthinkable 12 yrs ago, I would not be surprised if its achieved in a “The 13th floor” type of tech ..then things can get scary when people will prefer the alternate experience to real life..(or maybe we are already in one?)
I think it’s pretty inevitable that AI videos will become the majority of muscle content consumed. Maybe people who intend to meet these ladies will hold out, but AI will just offer better content for folk who just want to gawk at a screen.
With rare exception muscle girls don’t really know what fans want and hardly ever deliver with high quality videos. AI girls look AI at the moment, but even in like a year they’ll probably be indistinguishable from the real thing. When muscle fans are creating the videos they want to see with girls that look real or realistic morphs it’s gonna be a whole new ballgame.
Just look at the stories you read in muscle fantasy vs actual videos. The stories were always so much hotter because they’re written by muscle fans vs videos by girls who are mostly just boring bodybuilders.
agreed that those who will be satisfied at gawking at a screen will find the most benefit now and in the short term.. you can now “build” your preferred muscle girl in looks, style, size, conditioning and outfits ..producing pictures of your perfect muscle girl is already a reality.. by extension videos are also possible as well, although a bit more skill is needed for prompts and money for those who use the cloud services,,
Before when I saw the cartoony ones I was thinking no way will that ever truly take off. But the kind Zoltan Vegh produces are actually impressive. Improve on the lip sink and lessen the glossy look and this might actually do some damage.
https://www.clips4sale.com/studio/450581/musc... https://zoltanveghvideos.gumroad.com/
Yes, absolutely. I am very intrigued by his creations and was considering buying a few. But I figured it would be more rewarding to learn how to locally generate AI content myself. Anyway, it won't be long before adult content creators are rendered obsolete as AI becomes more powerful and accessible. Addiction will certainly become more widespread. It's an absurdly powerful technology.
If you don’t want to or can’t do sessions, and if you don’t live in an area with a high concentration of female bodybuilders, it’s just a fantasy from the get-go. Personally, I’ve felt “cheated” out of sexual fulfillment when it comes to muscular women for decades. So it wouldn’t be a big step to switch to “real” virtuality, where you can create anything according to your desires. Because it doesn’t matter whether it’s in reality or in virtuality—it will never become “truly” real!
For pictures sure. Videos are a harder question since LLM providers are backing down with the offering due to cost.
And I don't know what you mean by the real thing. At least for me, they are just pixels on a screen. I don't meet these girls in real life and only chance of interaction is with large sum of money.
No. It is not economical. The only reason ordinary people can afford LLMs now is because they're heavily subsidizeIt'd. That will quickly end as generative video is a huge waste of compute.
I agree. I think it's going to go the way of enschittification like we have seen from things like ridesharing, streaming services and food delivery. LLMs are literally in the first phase of what have seen before (in this case, heavily subsidized growth.) It can't be sustained forever, and soon, that will come to an end and those costs will be passed to consumers.
No. It is not economical. The only reason ordinary people can afford LLMs now is because they're heavily subsidized. That will quickly end as generative video is a huge waste of compute.
You're correct that it's not economical, but subsiding and operating at a loss for years in pursuit of profitability isn't new.
Uber was founded in 2009 and wasn't profitable until 2023. Investors burned through several billions for 14 years.
NIMBY resistance to data centers is more likely to present an obstacle; but that often loses to brute force.
Everyone on this thread is old and from a place called "Before World". Even if you're a full 30 years younger than I am, you're still old in this context.
As noted in that other thread, none of us has the lens of a 10-year-old who's grown up in an almost entirely digital world. What's "always better" for us may barely be a thing for the kid of today in 10 years from now.
It's my belief there will absolutely be a significant audience for AI-gen content.
Growing up with AI gens is no different
No different
Even before puberty hits, males see what they need to. There's nothing remotely unique about AI gens in that regard.
Imagine having a video call with your favorite fantasy beauty and "she" (ai) does all imaginable things you like in real time. That will be the future and it WILL be scary, because the border to surreality will fade away. The artificial becoming more firm/available than the real ladies. There are some themes (games) around that future, best to recall is "The Moment of Silence", it's a point and click adventure, so just watching it via youtube should show all the content about ai slowly/silently/sneakily taking control over the world including realistic dating video chats. EDIT: The movie Her (2013) seems to catch the points about future ai pretty well, too. Also Companion (2025) seems like a good prediction as well. For more ai-content recommendations we even could ask ai itself ^^ .
You're correct that it's not economical, but subsiding and operating at a loss for years in pursuit of profitability isn't new.
Uber was founded in 2009 and wasn't profitable until 2023. Investors burned through several billions for 14 years.
NIMBY resistance to data centers is more likely to present an obstacle; but that often loses to brute force.
In general you're not wrong that companies will eat losses to gain market share, but that doesn't apply here. There are severe constraints at basically every step of the AI supply chain. Every hyperscaler is capacity constrained, there's a shortage of memory chips, there's not enough power to keep the data centers running, there's a shortage of helium, etc. OpenAI shuttered Sora after just six months because it is not cost effective. They desperately need that compute for things with a higher ROI. The party with subsidies was always going to end, but the timetable has accelerated dramatically due to the reasons I listed. Uber is a really bad example because 1) they were not similarly constrained and 2) their capex needs were significantly smaller. For example, Uber's 2025 capex was $336 million. OpenAI's 2025 capex was $8 billion. Entirely different situations. This has nothing to do with strategy and everything to do with scarcity.
Before when I saw the cartoony ones I was thinking no way will that ever truly take off. But the kind Zoltan Vegh produces are actually impressive. Improve on the lip sink and lessen the glossy look and this might actually do some damage.
https://www.clips4sale.com/studio/450581/musc... https://zoltanveghvideos.gumroad.com/