Yeah it's mostly accurate. I have plenty of blood lab results from my clients who have been on cycle, and most definitely compounds like Equipoise (Boldenone)and Deca (Nandrolone) will most definitely give skewed results for Testosterone, Estradiol, and Progesterone ECLIA (standard) tests. So to sit there and say ALL DHT and 19nor compounds won't flag is not entirely accurate. For LC/MS (sensitive tests) AAS would not flag or give skewed results at all, it tests specifically for a very specific molecule. But in the general sense what she is saying is true - basic blood tests do not in anyway prove "natty." It's very simple to fake results, it's also simple to test off cycle and show normal blood work.
The only way to truly prove Natty is to do a full WADA doping panel which tests not just for AAS but also for AAS metabolites which can remain in the body for months post cycle. Furthermore, if you used a certain dose of drugs to make yourself a certain size, you need a much smaller dose to maintain your supraphyisological muscle mass after the fact. These doses for females can be particularly low, I am always blown away with just how much mass and strength and athlete can maintain on so little once the initial balloon up is done. Many atheltes claim natty once they hit this point since they aren't using heavy cycles anymore they are just using barely elevated HRT to maintain (much like Hannah herself). This of course is a misnomer since they often fail to disclose all the drugs they needed to super up in the beginning.
Log in |
Register
Yeah it's mostly accurate. I have plenty of blood lab results from my clients who have been on cycle, and most definitely compounds like Equipoise (Boldenone)and Deca (Nandrolone) will most definitely give skewed results for Testosterone, Estradiol, and Progesterone ECLIA (standard) tests. So to sit there and say ALL DHT and 19nor compounds won't flag is not entirely accurate. For LC/MS (sensitive tests) AAS would not flag or give skewed results at all, it tests specifically for a very specific molecule. But in the general sense what she is saying is true - basic blood tests do not in anyway prove "natty." It's very simple to fake results, it's also simple to test off cycle and show normal blood work.
The only way to truly prove Natty is to do a full WADA doping panel which tests not just for AAS but also for AAS metabolites which can remain in the body for months post cycle. Furthermore, if you used a certain dose of drugs to make yourself a certain size, you need a much smaller dose to maintain your supraphyisological muscle mass after the fact. These doses for females can be particularly low, I am always blown away with just how much mass and strength and athlete can maintain on so little once the initial balloon up is done. Many atheltes claim natty once they hit this point since they aren't using heavy cycles anymore they are just using barely elevated HRT to maintain (much like Hannah herself). This of course is a misnomer since they often fail to disclose all the drugs they needed to super up in the beginning.
Agreed, hats off to her for calling this out.