It's fine if she is posing with random guys at expos or shows and stuff, but when the same guy starts appearing in several pics it upsets me a little
Some people like seeing it, some people don't, some people are completely indifferent. The same with implants, tattoos, PED sides, offseason softness, contest shape shreds, and the higher and lower ends of muscularity on this site. I don't think it would be reasonable to place restrictions on uploading them; we'd miss out on some good pictures and videos.
I don't know how complicated this would be to set up, but a possible solution could enable users to set a filter for what they want to see on their homepage, where they could specify which tags to show, and which to hide. There would also need to be a significant other tag, with widespread adoption for this to work well.
But overall I don't think it is enough of an issue to warrant any change.
I mean...you can't ignore the fact that a lot of muscular women have boyfriends. Learn to deal with it.
I mean...you can't ignore the fact that a lot of muscular women have boyfriends. Learn to deal with it.
but the problem is a lot of these women have boyfriends or husbands who are x2 their size, it kind of ruins the immersion for me. it's very rare to see a fit muscular woman with a skinny man
but the problem is a lot of these women have boyfriends or husbands who are x2 their size, it kind of ruins the immersion for me. it's very rare to see a fit muscular woman with a skinny man
It's still perfect immersion because those guys are bigger than you. That trivial matter doesn't change the fact that she is still much bigger and stronger than you. It would look like a matryoshka dolls cosplay if you were in those pictures.
You're on the right track though. We need tougher regulations on photos with pets. They're not sending us their best pictures.
but the problem is a lot of these women have boyfriends or husbands who are x2 their size, it kind of ruins the immersion for me. it's very rare to see a fit muscular woman with a skinny man
There it is. I am fascinated by the irony that some guys here hate it that muscular women are attracted to, well, the exact same physical traits that we are attracted to in women. Reminds me of the whole "they can't do that to our pledges, only we can do that to our pledges!" from Animal House.
The way I see it as a browser of this site: I am a visitor enjoying the content that muscular women put out that they want out, and that it's not up to me to say what they should post or not (unless of course I am paying for a custom.) This is pure speculation, but I wonder if that desire to not see picture of buff women with their buff significant others come from jealousy or body insecurity in the fact that the boyfriend/husband looks completely different than the typical schmoe.
OP, have you ever asked yourself just why it's rare to see a fit muscular woman with a skinny man? And do you feel the same way if their partner is also a woman because they're bisexual or a lesbian?
OP, have you ever asked yourself just why it's rare to see a fit muscular woman with a skinny man? And do you feel the same way if their partner is also a woman because they're bisexual or a lesbian?
I think it comes down to whether the woman in question is more dominant or submissive. the fantasy that a lot of guys on this site have is that a muscular woman is dominant and so will want a weaker guy for a partner, which is sadly, I will admit not the case. most women with muscles or who are into sports / crossfit seem to like having partners who are bigger than them so, despite their impressive physiques, these tough ladies (like most ladies probably) seem to gravitate towards being submissive.
The issue of bisexual or lesbian partners is a little more complex because there's a stereotype that one partner in that sort of relationships is more "butch" and one is more "femme". Now typically the more muscular woman is dominant one, but it doesn't always have to be the case - I haven't seen it myself, but I imagine that, for some lesbian couples, the physically stronger one could be more "femme".
To summarize my previous point, I would totally prefer if all muscular, bodybuilding, and fitness women are BI rather than STRAIGHT, because it would improve the fantasy of them being dominant in all aspects of life. In lesbian relationships, the stronger woman is almost guaranteed to be the alpha, while in straight relationships the muscular women are typically with buffer dudes.
I heard from a female friend in casual conversation that most women these days can switch between being dominant or submissive based on the kind of guy she's interacting with (for example, being alpha with a weaker guy while being submissive to a stronger man). This might explain the phenomenon of fit women catering to a certain audience by being assertive and even a little cocky, but in their personal lives having a more traditional outlook of being a good supportive wife and mother.
Just my 2 Cents...
To summarize my previous point, I would totally prefer if all muscular, bodybuilding, and fitness women are BI rather than STRAIGHT, because it would improve the fantasy of them being dominant in all aspects of life. In lesbian relationships, the stronger woman is almost guaranteed to be the alpha, while in straight relationships the muscular women are typically with buffer dudes.
I'd like all women had peaked biceps, but our lives can't be our fantasies.
It's not a big deal but it's quite boring when they have huge boyfriends. it's the same as most non muscular people but on a bigger scale when. I see a guy with a taller girlfriend I think wow lucky but it's just that the boyfriend is super short or weak not that the woman is very strong. I have never seen very muscular women irl apart from a jogger that was alone. it's more interesting with a regular or smaller guy. but in the end it doesn't matter if the pictures and clips are good
its "Girls with Muscle", not "Single Girls with Muscle"
LoL. By the way: indeed.
its "Girls with Muscle", not "Single Girls with Muscle"
Yea you could also argue its "Girls with Muscle" not "Adult Girls with Muscle" or "Unmorphed Girls with Muscle" or "Non-AI Girls with Muscle" or "Non-nude Girls with Muscle" etc etc.
I totally agree that seeing partners in the image is annoying af. After all, its "Girls with Muscle" not "Girls and their partners with Muscle"
Yea you could also argue its "Girls with Muscle" not "Adult Girls with Muscle" or "Unmorphed Girls with Muscle" or "Non-AI Girls with Muscle" or "Non-nude Girls with Muscle" etc etc.
I totally agree that seeing partners in the image is annoying af. After all, its "Girls with Muscle" not "Girls and their partners with Muscle"
I'll spell it out for you since you dont seem to understand the comment.
"Girls with Muscle", not "Single Girls with Muscle" implies that the site just shows girls with muscle and it is not going to change to suit a minority crowd. If you want a site with "Single girls with muscle" or whatever your fantasy is.... Go build the website yourself or just annoy the mods to put rules in place if you feel the need.
I ain't arguing nobody. Im just saying shut up :)
I'll spell it out for you since you dont seem to understand the comment.
"Girls with Muscle", not "Single Girls with Muscle" implies that the site just shows girls with muscle and it is not going to change to suit a minority crowd. If you want a site with "Single girls with muscle" or whatever your fantasy is.... Go build the website yourself or just annoy the mods to put rules in place if you feel the need.
I ain't arguing nobody. Im just saying shut up :)
My dude, you're doing a great disservice to the effort to counter the rumor that muscle mommy fans are just closeted homosexuals by stubbornly insisting that pictures of male bodybuilders should be posted here.
The OP basically stated that they are bothered by reality and want to mods to curate pictures to shield them from something that breaks their fantasy, so off that bat I would say this is not a request that should be taken seriously based the reasoning behind it. Not trying to be insulting to anyone, I just don't think it would do the site or honestly its members any favors if it were to remove content for those reasons.
If you're adding your own words anywhere into the site name to try and argue why the site is really about, or not about what you want it to be, that's a little ridiculous. The site name is whatever the creator wanted it to be, and similarly, what the site should contain is defined by them; I think there's an uploads faq thread somewhere- that or a moderator is where you should make you inferences from. My guess is it was generic and not as specific as some of the above examples for a reason.
Generally we have taken the approach is that model needs to be the principal element, but otherwise we have no requirement for there to be only women in the photo, or video. In any situation the mods make the final call. If this bothers you, then just ignore the photo or find another site that suits your ideals.
Is there some way to restrict people from uploading images of female bodybuilders or fitness models with their significant others? Maybe I'm just selfish but I would prefer to imagine they are single