Log in | Register
Forum > Site Discussion > Thread

Photos with kids: why it's allowed???

Mar 08, 2025 - edited Mar 08, 2025 - permalink

I mean... the reasons are many to not uploading photos with babes/kids. You all know that many of us use this space for dirty things, so why still are allowed photos with kids? I find it unacceptable for users to post photos/videos with children. I just discovered a new athlete who is a mother and I had the minimum common sense to not upload absolutely any photos of her with her daughter. Why can't other users do the same? I had already questioned another photo of Nadia with her daughter in a comment here, but unfortunately my comments were classified with "too little substance".

Last example:

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/2477345/

And yes, before you question me, from now on I will use the report function every time I come across photos where children are also present.

Chainer
Mar 08, 2025 - permalink

It's not allowed.

I'm also not a fan of your performative outrage here where you get greatly upset over a picture that was posted a whole ten minutes before you made your post, complete with a rage bait thread title that assumes something that isn't true.

And yes, before you question me, from now on I will use the report function every time I come across photos where children are also present.

Great!

Mar 08, 2025 - permalink

It's not allowed.

I'm also not a fan of your performative outrage here where you get greatly upset over a picture that was posted a whole ten minutes before you made your post, complete with a rage bait thread title that assumes something that isn't true.

Great!

In fact, it is something that has been happening more frequently, so I wasn't "performative", because it is something that needs to be reminded frequently to users how strictly prohibited this is, but I will not prolong the issue. In any case, I am more relaxed that this is in the rules and I will report it whenever I see a case like this. Once again, I appreciate the feedback.

tamarok
Mar 09, 2025 - permalink

If it is happening more frequently it is likely because the number of uploaders has increased and thus the percentage of uploads that don’t respect the rules. This is why image reports are so important and are appreciated.

Do remember that the mods are all volunteers, doing this in their free time.

Mar 09, 2025 - permalink

I thought this too. Had assumed it was allowed since I sometimes would come across those images, new and old. A few had the common sense enough to either crop or blot out the children. Probably best not to post them at all though.

Now that I know its not allowed, I will report it if I see it.

Mar 10, 2025 - permalink

"no minors, under 18" has been an uploading rule for ages. That includes "coincidental" images of children, not just eg a fit but too young gymnast etc . Just use the report button as and when you spot. There's likely a few older pics that have been missed.

Mar 10, 2025 - permalink

I'd prefer "no guys" too, that is no guys posing in the picture (background is different)

Mar 10, 2025 - permalink

I'd prefer "no guys" too, that is no guys posing in the picture (background is different)

Yeah, most people seem incapable of cropping a jpg to png which would improve many pics. Instead they add the lazily overused "body comparison" tag.

Mar 10, 2025 - permalink

I'd prefer "no guys" too, that is no guys posing in the picture (background is different)

I don't see what the issue is with guys posing with them. Female bodybuilders often are friends with, and date, male bodybuilders, so it's not uncommon for them to pose together. It's a MUCH different thing than kids in pictures, which should not be on the site.

Mar 19, 2025 - permalink

I agree kids should not be in pictures posted to this site with female bodybuilders or fitness models. I understand the ladies want to include their kids or cousins, whoever, but keep those private

tamarok
Mar 19, 2025 - permalink

Under 18s (termed minors) are NOT allowed and we ask any images found with them to be reported.

As for the “guys” that is a different topic, so discuss it in a new topic.

Mar 19, 2025 - permalink

How come they are letting the Isabel Welden video slide?

tamarok
Mar 19, 2025 - permalink

How come they are letting the Isabel Welden video slide?

Which videos? Report them (as we keep asking 😭).

We are volunteer mods and don't have an all seeing power that allows us to guess at every single piece of content uploaded at any given moment. Crying about a problematic piece of content without communicating this to the mods is just a waste of energy and really doesn't help getting things resolved.

Mar 19, 2025 - edited Mar 19, 2025 - permalink

Which videos? Report them (as we keep asking 😭).

We are volunteer mods and don't have an all seeing power that allows us to guess at every single piece of content uploaded at any given moment. Crying about a problematic piece of content without communicating this to the mods is just a waste of energy and really doesn't help getting things resolved.

I did report it. It got taken down. Thanks!

Chainer
Mar 20, 2025 - permalink

I actually restored that one, it's one thing if a child is front and center in the pic but this is a case which is fully in public and the minors are incidental and non-central (by which I mean, in the background or the audience).

Apr 05, 2025 - permalink

I'm all for this, but if this is the case, we should probably take down the "mother" tag as it's pointless. At least half the women here are probably mother's so it's a moot point to make a "mother" tag.

Chainer
Apr 05, 2025 - permalink

At least half the women here are probably mother's

This is not at all obviously true.

Apr 22, 2025 - permalink

This is not at all obviously true.

So if we're trying to get children out of the photo, why have a tag of "mother"? It's pointless.

Apr 22, 2025 - permalink

I'd prefer "no guys" too, that is no guys posing in the picture (background is different)

I like the ones where the girls have bigger biceps than the guys, so let's not censor the photos with guys!

tamarok
Apr 22, 2025 - permalink

So if we're trying to get children out of the photo, why have a tag of "mother"? It's pointless.

A woman can be a parent without having their child in the photo. As for mother & son and mother & daughter, then they work as long as the child is over 18. Any depicted person should be above 18.

Apr 23, 2025 - permalink

A woman can be a parent without having their child in the photo. As for mother & son and mother & daughter, then they work as long as the child is over 18. Any depicted person should be above 18.

Ok, well let's put "cousin", "niece", "firefighter", and "US postal service worker" in the tags then since they could be all that without all that being mentioned in the photo. What does it matter????? I think it's disgraceful to the families to just have a tag as "mother". Like I said before, half of these women are probably mothers, there's no need. Kind of like the tag "Black". Duh. We see that.

Apr 23, 2025 - permalink

Wow! For a free site full of pics and clips to look through at your leisure people sure are demanding.

« first < prev Page 1 of 1 next > last »