Forum
>
Site Discussion
>
Thread
Log in |
Register
It's an AI-generated image, so no. The mod who deleted it probably selected the wrong reason.
No, she is real. Hitsuji Negoto, she is a cosplayer, and this is a photo from one of her photo shoots. The post-processing is visible, but it is not photoshop. And she is wearing a wig here to look like an anime girl, if that confused you
Thanks for providing reference data PP1000.
After careful examination, I can confirm those leg muscles are heavily edited.
Her picture on November 2nd shows no muscular development in the hamstrings or calves.
The "Brazilian Miku" photo also highlights a glaring absence of musculature.
Finally, this video.
As we speed closer to a Blade Runner style future, these AI enhancements will become ever more deceiving.
Thanks for providing reference data PP1000.
After careful examination, I can confirm those leg muscles are heavily edited.
Her picture on November 2nd shows no muscular development in the hamstrings or calves.
The "Brazilian Miku" photo also highlights a glaring absence of musculature.
Finally, this video.
As we speed closer to a Blade Runner style future, these AI enhancements will become ever more deceiving.
It's sad that people still don't realize the power of perspective, light and shadow, and in this case, the banal tension of muscles and their volume at a particular moment in time. This girl doesn't set a goal to have noticeable muscles all year round. She or the photographer just decided to emphasize her leg muscles, for which she stood on her toes, obviously a favorable perspective was chosen and light and shadow was applied to enhance the effect. If we had to delete every photo here where these manipulations are carried out, we would lose a good third of the photos. Whether this is good or bad, decide for yourself, but emphasizing volumes, unlike morphs, is legal one way or another
Thanks for providing reference data PP1000.
After careful examination, I can confirm those leg muscles are heavily edited.
Her picture on November 2nd shows no muscular development in the hamstrings or calves.
The "Brazilian Miku" photo also highlights a glaring absence of musculature.
Finally, this video.
As we speed closer to a Blade Runner style future, these AI enhancements will become ever more deceiving.
If only she decided to work out she’d look way better.
It's sad that people still don't realize the power of perspective, light and shadow, and in this case, the banal tension of muscles and their volume at a particular moment in time. This girl doesn't set a goal to have noticeable muscles all year round. She or the photographer just decided to emphasize her leg muscles, for which she stood on her toes, obviously a favorable perspective was chosen and light and shadow was applied to enhance the effect. If we had to delete every photo here where these manipulations are carried out, we would lose a good third of the photos. Whether this is good or bad, decide for yourself, but emphasizing volumes, unlike morphs, is legal one way or another
Qimmah is a perfect example of This but this model (4iP_3iP) is not, the weight difference is way too noticeable here she looks totally different irl very skinny zero muscle even when flexed.. she doesn’t belong.
Ripped? are you kidding? The only reason any of her muscles are at all remotely visible is because she is skinny.
I agree.
If I had seen that on the site I wouldn't hesitate to report it. Not that I'm trying to pop anybodies balloon but there is no muscle on this model. There's been a real influx of posts the past couple of months that fit into the so skinny there's nothing but muscle left category but that doesn't qualify as toned or athletic.
I do not know if this is the right place to argue about this but I got my upload reported as well:
There is no ai or any editing involved here but most importantly she clearly has a well delfined, dare I say " ripped " six-pack so I don’t understand. How little is too little muscle ?
Yeah I'm reporting this every time, this is someone with below average muscularity.
We should remind people that the site is "Girls with Muscle" and not "Fit Looking Women". The bar for acceptance in each category is not the same.
Also, the acceptance is about "visible muscle", since some models may appear muscular in one photo, but not in another. We are judging on the contents of the photo and not the generalisation of the model.
Admin is just power tripping loser who deletes post from people he doesn’t like, I upload videos of existing models who are muscular enough, then it’s some bs reason like “highlight reel clips not allowed” wtf does that even mean??? Or “duplicate of xyz” as if I didn’t double check to see if there were no duplicates of this same woman! My video of Rhonda Dethlefs also got lost in the void for weeks before it was accepted because admin probably didn’t want to accept that it passed the rules…
If you are below a score of 100 forget abt posting anything with these guys on the team who let any garbage through if your score is over 100. Or my other reasoning is they only like max roided freaks who don’t even look like a woman anymore. Might I remind the name of the site is “girls with muscle” not “mandem with muscle”.
If there was one way to sum up the posting of images on this site it’s like trying to get a license at the DMV. You know, on TV shows where the DMV is totally full of shit and sends you back because of article 93 subsection 15 or some other crap…
As far as I can tell you've had two images rejected.
One of them was rejected because it was a duplicate of an existing one.
The other was indeed rejected because "highlight reel". It's borderline; the editing on it is terrible with the quick cuts. That said, she doesn't have many images of her on the site so I could see it being accepted. (I wasn't the one who rejected it.)
The best thing is to read the upload guidelines and rules. Also, any video full of multiple cuts where each cut is barely a 2 seconds long isn’t great, since the muscle is barely visible. For this video, you are likely better off doing a frame grab (not a screenshot) of where she is showing the most muscle and submit that.
For new uploaders I’d recommend making sure your uploads fall clearly in the guidelines and avoid anything that is considered borderline. As mods we are dealing with a lot of uploads, so our tolerance can be lower than you like. There are sometimes exceptions made for certain borderline uploads, but best not test those waters until you’re comfortable.
Classy, measured responses. High roads taken. Prime examples of fighting fire with water.
In the 16 years this photo has been here that picture received 4 votes. 2 of which came today since it was pinned to the front page. I saw it and it got under my skin. Seriously, how tight of a fit is it for this site? Not pointing a finger at the mods. Over the past year and a bit even more photos similar to this have been posted by users. I'm not slagging the model either just the suitability for the site. If she qualifies literally anybody qualifies to be here. The more time a person spends in front of a picture thinking if it's appropriate for the site the less chance it is.
Sorry to say, but the standard needs to be higher today than 16 years ago. With self-generated content, the amount of available images has increased by an order of magnitude.
16 years… damn, that makes me one of the old crew. “In my day…”
It’s as asianfitnessfan says, the standard for the uploads was lower at the beginning and these images have essentially been “grandfathered” and allowed to stay. More recent photos represent the newer expectations and don’t get that benefit. With social media bring what it is today, we are dealing with so many more uploads, making our tolerance lower for images that fall short of our expectations.
Certain images will still get removed if we find out about them, such as those with minors, since they are problematic for different reasons.
As always: please report problematic photos.
I agree 100% with elusive1's post. There are WAY too many photos appearing on this site with WAY too little muscle.
I'm a bicep guy myself, and I can't count the number of photos here in recent weeks where a pretty girl with absolutely minuscule biceps is showing off her guns -- but she's shooting blanks.
Please, everyone, we really appreciate your posting photos, but remember -- this site is called Girls WITH Muscle, NOT Girls WITHOUT!
I like seeing progress and seeing as they are not born that way a few pre pics don't bother me, infact they are awesome. They make the person's work and journey more real.
My opinion on the current trend. I am more impressed by a girl with a sports background than a fly by night muscle inflater. They do not have the superficial muscle that's lost in a year's downtime and they do not do it for the image. That is a true rep of what girls with muscle was.
Guys, is it possible to somehow appeal the removal of the image? One of the admins, using the excuse “Not enough visible musclularity,” deleted my upload, and it gained almost 40 points in less than 24 hours. It’s more like a mockery, you can see for yourself that she has powerful quadriceps and calves, and no one here deletes pics with only calves