Forum
>
Site Discussion
>
Thread
Log in |
Register
>
Though the number of women with big muscle and huge natural boobs could probably be counted one hand, unless they were extremely off season. Low body fat and natural big breasts are generally incompatible.
Well we now have a probably redundant "big breasts" tag... https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/?tags=...
Well we now have a probably redundant "big breasts" tag... https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/?tags=...
Prob should merge into "breast implants"
These tags are used interchangeably and could be merged into one for ease of searching and avoidance of doubt when tagging.
https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/?tags=... https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/?tags=...
"hanging leg raises" may be an appropriate replacement that catches both words when searching.
These tags are used interchangeably and could be merged into one for ease of searching and avoidance of doubt when tagging.
https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/?tags=... https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/?tags=...
"hanging leg raises" may be an appropriate replacement that catches both words when searching.
There’s a few of these under “hanging abs”:
Which tag should replace “hanging abs” in this instance?
Might've been mentioned before but "pecs flex" and "pec bouncing" should really be merged. You might argue there's a subtle nuance, but that's far from being enough to have two separate tags imo.
Might've been mentioned before but "pecs flex" and "pec bouncing" should really be merged. You might argue there's a subtle nuance, but that's far from being enough to have two separate tags imo.
Should all of the “bounce” tags be merged into a “flex“ tag? What makes pecs have less of a distinction between flexing and bouncing than other muscle groups?
Should all of the “bounce” tags be merged into a “flex“ tag? What makes pecs have less of a distinction between flexing and bouncing than other muscle groups?
Well, looking through the tags, I'd say yes. There's not much distinction between bouncing or flexing on any of the ones with separate tags, and should all be merged imo. I mean there's one called "glutes bouncing/flexing " and another called "glutes flex".
Should all of the “bounce” tags be merged into a “flex“ tag? What makes pecs have less of a distinction between flexing and bouncing than other muscle groups?
Yes but the bouncing is often a repeated deliberate playful bounce of the muscle, rather than a flex which is flexing it to show off size or shape. This might be repeated but it definitely distinct to a specific pec bounce or glute bounce which is playful and showing off the muscle control skills.
It is useful to keep the distinction so I wouldn't merge, otherwise they become buried and hard to find. Maybe this is something for the future tiered tags that might be coming (?). As long as people tag sensibly, which I think it part of the problem.
Examples of what I mean:
Yes but the bouncing is often a repeated deliberate playful bounce of the muscle, rather than a flex which is flexing it to show off size or shape. This might be repeated but it definitely distinct to a specific pec bounce or glute bounce which is playful and showing off the muscle control skills.
It is useful to keep the distinction so I wouldn't merge, otherwise they become buried and hard to find. Maybe this is something for the future tiered tags that might be coming (?). As long as people tag sensibly, which I think it part of the problem.
Examples of what I mean:
My issue is that all bouncing is also flexing, and thus images tend to get tagged to one or the other. Adding pec flexing tag to all pec bouncing tags would be also be fine imo.
This is generally used when a model has no real stand or muscle group. If 5 other muscle groups are also labelled, then it just seems redundant.