Forum
>
Site Discussion
>
Thread
Log in |
Register
I'm thinking this is an oversight.. I was under the impression their free/sample content wasn't supposed to have nudes.
it's not
for one Emery is blacklisted here
two, the ad displays are not controlled by us--if you look elsewhere the same clip is censored to some degree but other versions pick different time stamps as previews, we're looking into this
we aren't paid (i wish)
haven't had a chance to address this yet due to the holiday, but we are looking into it. has HB is posting some of the older physique dreams content that is being remastered this will come up a few more times i'm sure
You have an individual who is determined to post explicit nudes (usually of the same woman) and then get banned , then post more under another username. They know the rules and flount them. Current explicit pics have been up for at least 4 hours. If you can't ban their ip , which can change anyway, maybe the first 5 or 10 posts of a new member need to be mod approved, to try to avoid this kind of hit and run posting, though that won't stop the most determined I suppose.
Soooo getting sponsored by a company who mass produces content with nudity is ok but the users are not allowed to post nudity here because.... it's immoral? Not classy enough? On a fetish website? 🤔
Oh my, maybe I'm just not smart enough to understand this kind of guidlines without any recognizable logic behind it. Or was this ever explained?
Soooo getting sponsored by a company who mass produces content with nudity is ok but the users are not allowed to post nudity here because.... it's immoral? Not classy enough? On a fetish website? 🤔
Oh my, maybe I'm just not smart enough to understand this kind of guidlines without any recognizable logic behind it. Or was this ever explained?
Yes, it was explained. https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/forum/thread/...
Yes, it was explained. https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/forum/thread/...
Thank you. But doesn't the sponsorship contradicts the described intensions??? Or at least some of them? For me the situation looks still kinda odd.
No. The two main reasons I don't want user-posted nudity on this site are:
Nude content is much more likely to be private or from behind a paywall than non-nude stuff, and people (mostly understandably) are more protective over it so I want to avoid drawing that kind of attention
I have more options for vendors to work with in the future if there is no nudity on the site. This isn't relevant right this instant, but by allowing nudity I would needlessly be restricting the options available to the site in the future.
At no point do I care that HB, the site sponsor, sells content with nudity. It's not like I have any personal moral objection to it.
Oh gosh, I knew this question would come up with the adverts...again. Sighs.
Ok well that is an ad we can’t control
Yes, I know , its the same model that eventually had pixels added to their banner ad previously. https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/forum/thread/...
If there are any further reports of nudity, then this can be reported using the orange "Report" button found under every image and comment.
Herbiceps has clearly begun to censor their ads since there is no actual nudity until you click the ad and leave this site.
Otherwise this question has been answered a long time ago:
"No."
On the HBC section of the front page there's a video thumbnail of Emery Miller naked
Does the site allow nudity again in the NSFW section of the forum or is it just for sponsors ?