Forum
>
General / Nonfiction
>
Thread
Log in |
Register
How big do you like them? (664 total votes)
Bigger is better i have never seen a woman with muscles that are too big. in terms of hight there is a limit of about 230cm before they start having health issues. but i think the tallest Fbbs out there are still under 2m. i wonder if it's possible for a woman over 7foot tall to become a bodybuilder. or if the muscles will look too small .even if she has as much muscle as smaller Fbbs but they are more spread out so it doesn't look great.
For me personally, there comes a *sweet spot" of muscle development where you're fairly sure the girl is on gear, but not SO sure you'd be willing to put money on it.
For example, if Vladislava Galagan wasn't open about being on gear, I'd probably still say she was on gear. But I wouldn't be so sure I'd be willing to bet a large amount of money on it
Giantess, large muscles, off-season, feminine in all other respects. It does exist, but unfortunately is rarely photographed. Like Bigfoot I guess...
Some how “little muscle tone” is not a satisfactory choice. I like naturally buff women on the taller side who have obvious muscles. Despite the doubters, some women have the genetics and training/dieting discipline to achieve this like my partner and a couple women I have dated. Obvious muscle is just that and doesn’t have to be very hard, huge, veiny and thin skinned.
Height doesn't matter to me. I want to see the most muscle packed physiques.
It’s hard to say, I thought Shannon Courtney, was extreme at first, grew to feel attracted to her. Same with Carolyn Marquez, thought her quads were too big. Natalia Kuzetsova is example of what I find too huge. I thought Tarna had the perfect size and portions.
Height doesn't matter to me. I want to see the most muscle packed physiques.
I agree. More muscle is always best. Not that I don’t appreciate any muscle definition on a woman but big is best for me.
Crossfit competitor or topnotch college athlete https://www.instagram.com/sydneywells/
Although the biggest girls can be a turn-on too Or, for that, matter, just girls next door who are in shape. Wide range.
Height range 5'6" to 6'0"
The descriptions are meant to be open to interpretation, but for those who would like a rigid definition:
The difference between "muscle tone" and "large muscles" is meant to be the difference between natty and roided. But again, you can define it your own way since there are only a maximum of 10 options I can use for this poll. I would say if you're still on the fence, then imagine the biggest women you've seen and imagine the smallest you've seen... which do you prefer?