Who else should be on the "soft" blacklist for self-morphing their images?

All of Mimi Luph's recent output seem to be retouched by AI. They are tagged as such by Mimi on her Threads accounts.

Due to improving AI enhancements and alterations, this will become impossible to police.

Absolutely. It's already incredible with the latest Nano Banana, and within a year or so increasing muscles / slimming waist won't leave a single tell that G00b or anyone else will ever see.

The AI bros in India are going to make a fortune with fake American muscle girls onlyfans pages, just you wait.

I just discovered there's a "photoshopped" tag with 6 images. 4 of the 6 should be removed imho. Idk regarding the other two. In both cases, it's up to the mods, but I'm guessing these all slipped past the radar. I don't even know how appropriate the "photoshopped" tag is except to identify images that don't belong.

In these cases, I would argue that 'photoshopped' is more like 'costume,' so it is not a flag to delete. It is obvious that the tag is for certain effects that we know are not possible in reality. However, these effects are overt, not sneaky or hidden, such as an effect on the background/setting of the photo, rather than the muscularity of the model.

asianfitnessfan★:

In these cases, I would argue that 'photoshopped' is more like 'costume,' so it is not a flag to delete. It is obvious that the tag is for certain effects that we know are not possible in reality. However, these effects are overt, not sneaky or hidden, such as an effect on the background/setting of the photo, rather than the muscularity of the model.

Noted. And fair enough. This fits with color shifted images into various monotones, or when someone tints Lili Dong green as a She-Hulk cosplay. (Make her angry, she looks good when she's angry!)

Of course, that again makes me question the recent Julia Caceres AI Lion I asked about here. That was deleted shortly after I posted about it. On the one hand, it had a "sneaky" quality to it of looking realistic enough to fool those easily fooled by AI, but on the other hand, common sense dictated that she wasn't actually posing with a real lion in a busy gym, and it didn't involve altering her physical appearance.

This is a new territory of potential gray areas. I'll report when I see uploads that are forbidden, but I don't want to pester mods by reporting images considered acceptable.

Thanks for clarifying the mod rationale of the above. What is the distinction that led to deleting the lion?

Not so much morphing, but it looks to me as if these pictures have had "extra ab definition" and sweat. Don't get me wrong, an already impressive physique. A bit of AI sizzle to sell the steak? https://www.threads.com/@laura_ashleighh

starbuck6689:

Not so much morphing, but it looks to me as if these pictures have had "extra ab definition" and sweat. Don't get me wrong, an already impressive physique. A bit of AI sizzle to sell the steak? https://www.threads.com/@laura_ashleighh

Chainer previously ruled these as "soft blacklist" fodder, though it doesn't matter what's on Threads, only that it's not uploaded to the GWM galleries and presented as "real".

This was my response to Chainer which resulted in a model getting added to the soft blacklist: "Images of the following are hidden from the main gallery: Vanilla Livitski; reason: Possible editing".

The model is here, this seems like a bit of AI sizzle to me. (One example of several for the model here). I pointed to Threads above as it seems like every image has this treatment.

This may have been covered elsewhere and I'm happy to be proved wrong but quite a few of this model's pics are looking suspiciously over conditioned.

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/?name=...