Forum
>
Site Discussion
>
Thread
Log in |
Register
Is this "soft" blacklist available anywhere? I can see why you would not want them on the main page, but I think it would be fun to just browse through the list instead of having to know who to search for.
I have asked several times for this exact reason and the answer has always been "no."
I recently saw a Youtube short of an amazing woman, but could not immediately find her name in the comments. I checked this site for the clip, which would have received hundreds of likes, but it wasn't showing. I later found the name in a comment, and searched for it here. She was blacklisted.
Ayme De Oliveira
Her head is totally not proportional to her body or arms. It's laughable
I think most headshrinkers should be on the soft blacklist, usually it’s subtle and they’re still muscular meaning we lose a decent model
For Yuan Herong at least I've taken care of some additional manual restorations of some of her pics/clips to the original uploaders, and merging in any duplicates, but if anyone notices any more duplicates for either woman please use the Report button so they can be merged together.
Lauri Li, real name Laura Barragan - I had one deleted and there was another from a different user that was deleted. for morphing - I then self deleted another that was in my queue ( a back view) - she seems to be going a bit mad with the morphing lately.
these seem to be from her own Instagram so maybe needs to put on the soft black list? I mean look at this from her insta:
It would be best if blacklisting were implemented at the user level. In other words, everyone should be able to remove whoever they want from their "feed" because where the line should be drawn is entirely subjective.
I would love this. Not to derail but I think it would also make an excellent way to satisfy those who do not like tattoos, etc.
Lauri Li, real name Laura Barragan - I had one deleted and there was another from a different user that was deleted. for morphing - I then self deleted another that was in my queue ( a back view) - she seems to be going a bit mad with the morphing lately.
these seem to be from her own Instagram so maybe needs to put on the soft black list? I mean look at this from her insta:
(Correction: Laura Li) Yeah, she seems to be doing full-on AI overpaints in some of her recent posts, without indicating them as such. It's not like she hasn't been in genuinely impressive shape before, which makes it annoying, but compare what she actually looks like here to this nonsense that seems to be based on it. I added her to the soft blacklist, also removed a couple of her other more egregious modified photos from the site.
Yejin Choi (@cye_jin) absolutely needs to be added to the "soft" blacklist for "self-morphing" her images. Mostly head shrinking, but some images also have torso stretching, limb stretching, and/or waist shrinking.
Normal image:
Altered images (12 of 17 uploads):
Those are photos from photoshoots, which obviously have undergone a lot of processing. Not sure it’s fair to penalize her for that. Is she otherwise morphing her own photos for IG?
Those are photos from photoshoots, which obviously have undergone a lot of processing. Not sure it’s fair to penalize her for that. Is she otherwise morphing her own photos for IG?
Whether it's her or someone else like the photographer doing it is irrelevant. "Morphing" is against the policy of the GWM galleries. Just compare all her images against the first one. Most have had head shrinking and other manipulations done. 12 of her 17 total uploads are very obvious "morphs".
Don't minimize and make excuses. Chainer put a sign on the door of his store that says "no stealing". I provided evidence of a thief. Now you're saying "It was just a six pack of beer. Everybody does it."
Outside of the GWM galleries, her and her photographers can post all the morphed content they want. They can post it to the GWM forum too. But Chainer's rule is serial "morphers" get soft blacklisted. She's a serial "morpher" and got caught. Now the ball is in Chainer's court to soft blacklist her or not.
I didn't line up all her photos and compare them. Clearly you have a lot invested in this, so you must be right. I bet you're fun at parties!
There's quite a few AI images posted as real pics. obvious morphs, again, posted as real pics (both from the original fbb's and from other sources). I think the original ruling on this site was no gear/roids/ped's... which would eliminate MOST photos (even if gear's legal in the region for the girls...think Russia?) I don't think that rule's been enforced, since some of the women have been QUITE open about their usage. shrugs
There's quite a few AI images posted as real pics. obvious morphs, again, posted as real pics (both from the original fbb's and from other sources). I think the original ruling on this site was no gear/roids/ped's... which would eliminate MOST photos (even if gear's legal in the region for the girls...think Russia?) I don't think that rule's been enforced, since some of the women have been QUITE open about their usage. shrugs
I just like women that vaccinate themselves.
https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/?name=... for waist morphing?
Haha OMG that's so bad! Who believes this?!?
Okay you all came up with some nice point of views to think about ... relating to the "this site is somewat sexually weighted" too lol - it's somewhat true!
Considering all I heared I think it's true, there CAN'T be a limit/line that would suite everyone, so maybe ... MAYYYBE ... a tag/flag for "morphed" that you can set up with a checkbox on the menuline to filter those pics out or in, SEEMS smart. People would know: if I check this box, I'll see images or models who obviously change their outline, shape, proportions.
On the other hand: - This would open the gates to blow in ANY morphs here, wouldn't it? So ... we would still need models to be filtered out because their morphing/editing is too much?