Forum
>
Site Discussion
>
Thread
Log in |
Register
Is this "18+ age requirement" because of a law in the US? I ask because a lot of muscle girls under 18 post their stuff on Insta and I don't understand why reposting it at this place is not allowed?
Is this "18+ age requirement" because of a law in the US? I ask because a lot of muscle girls under 18 post their stuff on Insta and I don't understand why reposting it at this place is not allowed?
Just because something is legal doesn’t mean it’s a good idea to do it.
This is a fetish site. While there are guys here who are also bodybuilders or who are into fitness and lifting, the vast majority of guys are here to get sexually aroused to pictures of buff women. That’s the purpose of this site, and there is nothing wrong with that. However, when that is the purpose of the site, having underage girls featured comes across as very icky. Yes, they post on instagram, and no, a picture of a muscular minor flexing while clothed isn’t illegal, but you have to remember that they’re not posting those pictures on instagram as a means of our sexual gratification. Intent and purpose of posting the pictures is the difference between a young athlete posting something on their personal pages, and the same pic being posted on here.
Pics of minors don’t belong here, full stop.
We've gotten notes from users in the past about "well how come this was deleted and this wasn't". simplest answer is that the total volume of images on the site is really crazy, and it's hard to parse everything, especially without labels or names, so there are still photos from the early site days that are periodically deleted as we come across them or reported. Much easier to catch stuff in the queue.
I don't share exactly the same "morals" when it comes to that matter (I highly recommend the award-winning documentary "Are all men pedophi les?") but at the same time I have no problem with these rules. A few images less at this nice place doesn't matter to me. There are still more than enough. One last question: Why - for example - are tons of images of minor Dylan Crenshaw still online? She must be 15 or 16 in many of these images .
I don't share exactly the same "morals" when it comes to that matter (I highly recommend the award-winning documentary "Are all men pedophi les?") but at the same time I have no problem with these rules. A few images less at this nice place doesn't matter to me. There are still more than enough. One last question: Why - for example - are tons of images of minor Dylan Crenshaw still online? She must be 15 or 16 in many of these images .
Dylan is a user here, but I'm not sure of the cutoff point. I'd be find clearing out the images prior to her turning 18. if you can find the date i'm happy to do pruning. also many of them were uploaded by ttemp who, as many know, is/was a prolific uploader and sometimes things get lost in his big dumps
People complaining about this is down bad and should go to normal and horny jail
Just because something is legal doesn’t mean it’s a good idea to do it.
Pics of minors don’t belong here, full stop.
I think the worst part of all of this is that you have to be explicit about something this much obvious. And having to sort the "buuuuuuut..." people who always try to find some kind of "loophole" so they don't feel bad with themselves when they rub their junk on underage girls' pictures.
But, could be worse, they could be those kinds of freaks that are proud of that shit.
Here comes the usual angry and virtuous hypocrite - filled with so called "moral" but he has no idea what modern psychology says about hebephilia. Well I think everybody should have the right to express his opinion freely. Btw: The documentary I recommended can be watched for free. youtube.com/watch?v=brEQWKXVhbM
Because of your socialisation you think that way. But it is nothing weird about it. Hebephilia isnt't classified as sexual dissorder - unlike pedophilia (which I not support and never will). And btw: Liking the look of teenage girls - in my case only muscular/fit teenage girls - doesn't mean you are a supporter of child marrige or something like that. As I said: Watch the documentary. It's quite illuminating - at least for open minded people.
Is this "18+ age requirement" because of a law in the US? I ask because a lot of muscle girls under 18 post their stuff on Insta and I don't understand why reposting it at this place is not allowed?
It's definitely NOT the law. Some people have just decided they are the moral authority and conscience of the site. They either convinced the moderators who run it, or the moderators agree. And here we are.
I understand to a degree, but I also think it's kind of absurd and arbitrary to act as if it makes a difference if someone is 17 or 18. As if something magically happens in one year that changes everything.
But you can't dare to express any opinion about this, lest you be called a pedobear and they call Chris Hansen and Dateline NBC because you posted a photo of a fully-clothed 17 year old girl.
I accept that the battle is over for this site and they made their decision. It's probably the safer decision to avoid controversy and "Karen's" causing trouble, even though absolutely no laws have been broken.
That's the last I'll say about it.
It's definitely NOT the law. Some people have just decided they are the moral authority and conscience of the site. They either convinced the moderators who run it, or the moderators agree. And here we are.
I understand to a degree, but I also think it's kind of absurd and arbitrary to act as if it makes a difference if someone is 17 or 18. As if something magically happens in one year that changes everything.
But you can't dare to express any opinion about this, lest you be called a pedobear and they call Chris Hansen and Dateline NBC because you posted a photo of a fully-clothed 17 year old girl.
I accept that the battle is over for this site and they made their decision. It's probably the safer decision to avoid controversy and "Karen's" causing trouble, even though absolutely no laws have been broken.
That's the last I'll say about it.
Here we go with this shit again. Just because creeps like you and that other "I'm not a pedo, I have hebephilia guys!" moron don't understand the concept of a slippery slope that doesn't mean the rest of us have shit-tier morals like you two.
Of course there isn't a single difference between a 17-year old and an 18-year old pyshically you dope. 18 is not a magic number created by the porn fairy that makes a girl ready to be sexualized by other man without a care in the world . It's a line you're not supposed to cross because you have to draw the line SOMEWHERE. And just because you're comfortable with playing hopscotch with that line that doesn't mean the rest of us have to adhere to your bullshit.
Just because you think you're not a scumbag it doesn't mean you aren't.
Here we go with this shit again. Just because creeps like you and that other "I'm not a pedo, I have hebephilia guys!" moron don't understand the concept of a slippery slope that doesn't mean the rest of us have shit-tier morals like you two.
Of course there isn't a single difference between a 17-year old and an 18-year old pyshically you dope. 18 is not a magic number created by the porn fairy that makes a girl ready to be sexualized by other man without a care in the world . It's a line you're not supposed to cross because you have to draw the line SOMEWHERE. And just because you're comfortable with playing hopscotch with that line that doesn't mean the rest of us have to adhere to your bullshit.
Just because you think you're not a scumbag it doesn't mean you aren't.
DAMN STRAIGHT BROTHER
A couple of athletes have recently been removed from the blacklist as they've now cleared the 18+ age requirement.
This is not an invitation to reach back in time and pull images prior to turning 18, as they are not 18 in those images. They will be deleted.
Just a note in case anyone wonders why a posting is deleted or has been flagged.