"Why was this pic deleted?"

https://www.instagram.com/miibelle/p/DKj61mhMwOF/

This was deleted without a reason provided. Curious why.

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/2537090/

All I see is "Reason: Image Report:"

Since I didn't delete it, I can't really tell you much more. The one who deleted it might have suspected a morph, but that's just a guess.

Right. That's just how she looks. Should I just upload again since no reason was given?

Right. That's just how she looks. Should I just upload again since no reason was given?

I was going to comment that some of her stills look "enhanced": https://www.instagram.com/miibelle/p/DKFPg8VNHUE/

But it's hard to tell, since even in some of her video clips, her quads do stick out quite a bit, with unusual shapes:

I was going to comment that some of her stills look "enhanced": https://www.instagram.com/miibelle/p/DKFPg8VNHUE/

But it's hard to tell, since even in some of her video clips, her quads do stick out quite a bit, with unusual shapes:

Those clips does look strange. Notice when she turns her back, one of her legs suddenly look almost skinny. Like some lens effect is used...

I was the one who deleted it. It was reported as a morph, which due to a bug doesn't make it into the notification.

I wasn't sure, but I was suspicious of the fuzzy border of her quad on our right along with its unnatural looking shape. That said, if others don't think it's a morph I can restore it.

It's going to look weird with the bokeh filter she's using. I thought that was recognisable.

Kind of curious about this one. The picture comes from an Instagram story, not from OF. I'm not sure if she posted it on her OF, actually, as I don't have it. Thus, I wanted to know: if a picture is posted both on OF and IG, is it prohibited on the site?

Kind of curious about this one. The picture comes from an Instagram story, not from OF. I'm not sure if she posted it on her OF, actually, as I don't have it. Thus, I wanted to know: if a picture is posted both on OF and IG, is it prohibited on the site?

FWIW it also appears to be a still from this already posted video

FWIW it also appears to be a still from this already posted video

Yup, meaning that reuploading it isn't necessary, obviously. But the video wasn't uploaded by Lindmark at the time of the post I'm just curious to know, for the future, if OF had primacy over everything?

If it's a free preview we wouldn't automatically delete it, but we have no way of knowing so I just go by the image report. If you comment under it with a link to where it's posted as a preview, the deletion is less likely (but still possible, since we may not look at the comments).

Where was this rule mentioned and also how can you get live videos then without screen recording it ?

Where was this rule mentioned and also how can you get live videos then without screen recording it ?

I'm not an administrator of GWM and they will answer you correctly, but... use common sense! This type of post is crap!

I'm not an administrator of GWM and they will answer you correctly, but... use common sense! This type of post is crap!

You aren't an administrator !!

No one's asking your opinion here bud.

You aren't an administrator !!

No one's asking your opinion here bud.

And that's exactly why I gave... but I'll stop here. I'll let them explain the obvious to you.

Take the “no screenshots” and “no screen recordings” as a precision of “low quality”.

There are tools out there that can download reels.

Okay then these recordings should also be deleted...

And many more...

Seems OK to me since it was a livestream rather than a downloadable video. In the case of the latter it would not be OK since you should upload the raw video instead of a screen capture.

Seems OK to me since it was a livestream rather than a downloadable video. In the case of the latter it would not be OK since you should upload the raw video instead of a screen capture.

Kindly restore it then..

Thanks.

Take the “no screenshots” and “no screen recordings” as a precision of “low quality”.

There are tools out there that can download reels.

I don't understand because cancel good videos and difficult to find like this, while remain post very controversial of bad quality and probably morph as:

I have reported yet these three post.

We don’t allow morphs, so reporting them is the right action.

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/2455637/

So these type of videos aren't considered low quality and will not be deleted.

Or maybe it was uploaded by vlastek that's why....

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/2455637/

So these type of videos aren't considered low quality and will not be deleted.

Or maybe it was uploaded by vlastek that's why....

Myself I usually prefer to remove them, but we miss a bunch. I generally prefer to delete them and let Chainer decide if a video or image gets an exception.

There are tools out there for saving a reel and generally screenshots and screen recordings, especially those on mobile seem like a race to the bottom.

So these type of videos aren't considered low quality and will not be deleted.

Stop asking for a universal rule, that doesn't apply to categories like this that aren't outright banned. Yes, if you upload a screen recording instead of the actual captured video stream, that's lower-quality and is more likey to get rejected (especially if it has a bunch of chat text/etc covering the video), and it will lose in a merge to anyone who grabbed the video stream.

That said, I would tend to leave things like this up if they're somewhat unique, since livestreams are the type of thing that can be lost forever otherwise, and capturing them directly can be hard to set up depending on the service used, so the chances of someone else having a better version aren't great.

Full disclosure:

On May 8th I noticed 8 uploads missing consisting of 3 named women and 1 unknown. I don't know when they were actually removed, but it appears only one or two users did all the reports at once or close to it. I realize that 44 days have passed. I held off posting about it because I didn't want to write a low-effort whiny post. No, if I'm going to write a whiny post, it deserves my full attention. Kidding. I didn't want to write something low-effort, and I didn't want to fall into the whining category if possible.

I don't know if it's past the expiry period for restoring images, but perhaps mods could give an OK to reupload if that's the case and any are approved upon a closer look.

This is the first time I've posted in this thread. When I upload I try to adhere not only to the rules and advisories on the uploads page, but also to the advice and feedback from Chainer/Mods in the forum.

Anything I upload is intended to be curated; meaning I'm being picky to ensure that there's visible muscle development that surpasses what the "average" Jane Doe has, and matches or exceeds the muscularity of other models already deemed as acceptable on GWM.

phenoms (April 2, 2025)

I upload stuff not on some cynical calculation of what will increase my clout, but rather because I hope it's something others will enjoy. I love surfing the Internet and stumbling across some obscure find, someone that is fit just because she chooses to be, someone I never would've thought to look into.

I would like to think that the vast majority of users here have been attracted to female muscle as long as they can recall and can easily spot muscle with just a glance. Regardless of whether the mods think the 8 deleted images are GWM worthy, I'll bet that upon viewing the full size images, every mod would see the same muscularity I saw.

tamarok★:

There are women that may be border line and get a closer look, but if these are by uploaders who have a reputation for not making an effort in being selective (we don’t have a list, but we do have our own memory), then we as mods aren’t going to be forgiving. Why should mods give time approving borderline images from uploaders who don’t seem to care to follow the rules? Borderline images also take a little more time to mod, since we need to really decide whether they are closer to accept to reject. If we get tired, they automatically go in the reject pile.

My hope is none of my uploads were considered low effort or borderline and were moreso deleted while the mod(s) were tired as tamarok says.

3 pics of Krystal Chryssomallis were deleted. While I was careful to only upload images with visible muscle, I am only going to advocate for restoring this one:

Here are the other two:

The middle row was a news anchor that clearly likes hitting the gym. I uploaded because I think she's worthy and equal/exceeds the GWM threshold. Unfortunately I can't remember her name. I can see how she might be considered borderline and I'm not invested in advocating that her pictures be restored.

Next is collegiate sports coach Jenny Boucek for whom I'd uploaded 2 images. The reporting user likely saw these together with the other reported images on my profile, but curiously only the one below was deleted:

Finally an unknown cosplayer with substantial muscular development clearly apparent. Her costume may cover her entire body, but is skintight. Unless I'm sorely mistaken about the standards of GWM, muscle through clothes is perfectly acceptable. I'm advocating that her picture is restored.

If nothing else is restored, I'd like to see the Krystal Chryssomallis pic in the yellow top and the cosplayer in the catsuit back up. Honestly, I was perplexed by their deletions.