Forum
>
Paysite Reviews
>
Thread
Log in |
Register
Has anyone subscribed to Ali Romero’s page? I think she has a nice body but I’m curious what she has on her onlyfans. onlyfans .com/aliiciaromeroo
Mallory Dawn's OF is free. I think she had a mental breakdown or something and just gave up on charging ppl $, bc I definetly paid money to follow her in the past. Tons of videos of her nude flexing and playing with her tits. Really quality stuff.
Hopefully this doesn't veer too far off topic of reviewing specific OF profiles but when it comes to a platform like OF, in you guys' opinion what do you think is a fair business model for everyone (whether they have a crap ton of money to burn or are living paycheck to paycheck just to get buy) to buy into to support the athletes on OF?
In my opinion, a low monthly subscription price (5 to 15 dollars) + 3 to 5 weekly PPVs that are between 2 to 5 minutes in length, priced anywhere between 10 to 40 dollars + 15 to 30 second previews of said PPVs is REASONABLE. It can be flexible if the pricing goes a bit above or below that range but I don't think anyone is going to flip their lid with that kind of model in place. And that's not including things like photos, customs, livestreams and other means of content that is offered by the creator. Was curious to see where you guys think the needle should move.
To answer your question, I think giving users a clear idea of what they are and are not getting for the monthy price (including whether or not the material is exclusive) is fair, regardless of the price. That is to say that this should be the minimum barrier of what we expect and it would be a huge improvement if it was the expected standard. After that it's simply a question of what each model/user agrees is "worth it" both to put out and to pay for. That's going to be a different price point for everyone.
She’s been having rough times since before her divorce. Hope she’s alright though she isn’t nearly as active on social as she used to be
Oh I had no idea, I wish her the best.
There are still locked posts though.
I was a sub for her before she made the page free and abandoned it (I'd like to say that happened last June or so), but yes...plenty of great flexes to be had. She sure knew how to work the angles and get in close to really make her peaks shine.
That said, I don't believe she ever went topless, as she always had "glitter" on her chest, so nips were never fully exposed. Unless she did customs, which I am not aware of.
There are still locked posts though.
Yeah I unlocked some, the free ones are just as good.
I was a sub for her before she made the page free and abandoned it (I'd like to say that happened last June or so), but yes...plenty of great flexes to be had. She sure knew how to work the angles and get in close to really make her peaks shine.
That said, I don't believe she ever went topless, as she always had "glitter" on her chest, so nips were never fully exposed. Unless she did customs, which I am not aware of.
Yeah yeah ok touche, there was glitter on her tits
You know, getting off a car, or off your bed.
I always thought you get 'out' of a car, not off it.
Hopefully this doesn't veer too far off topic of reviewing specific OF profiles but when it comes to a platform like OF, in you guys' opinion what do you think is a fair business model for everyone (whether they have a crap ton of money to burn or are living paycheck to paycheck just to get buy) to buy into to support the athletes on OF?
In my opinion, a low monthly subscription price (5 to 15 dollars) + 3 to 5 weekly PPVs that are between 2 to 5 minutes in length, priced anywhere between 10 to 40 dollars + 15 to 30 second previews of said PPVs is REASONABLE. It can be flexible if the pricing goes a bit above or below that range but I don't think anyone is going to flip their lid with that kind of model in place. And that's not including things like photos, customs, livestreams and other means of content that is offered by the creator. Was curious to see where you guys think the needle should move.