Log in | Register
Forum > Paysite Reviews > Thread

MuscleAngels.com

fn1a
Nov 25, 2011 - permalink
One site that seemed to have really good content is MuscleAngels.com, which has top bodybuilders/models and high resolution/close photography. I need to buy a new PC before I start my monthly subscription again (it expired 2 years ago).

I'm interested in other people's feedback on MuscleAngels.
snare
Nov 25, 2011 - permalink
I was a member of MuscleAngels back in the fall of last year (2010) for a few months.
My displeasure with the site was too few close up video clips.
Way too much camera movement and background filler.
I currently belong to female-bodybuilders dot org.
The models filmed are mostly European and their video work is the best I have found, IMHO.
baredivas
Dec 11, 2012 - permalink
I liked muscle angles......
crazycatcha
Apr 01, 2015 - permalink
The downloads are limited to 2.5 Gbytes per day (if I remember well), the account is suspended if you go beyond that limit.
May 21, 2015 - permalink
I've subscribed to MuscleAngels a number of times, and will in the future. I like that they feature a lot of the larger and more heavily muscled women.
knocker
Feb 10, 2017 - permalink
I just got off a one month subscription and ra5cvigi is right.  They do heavily favor the bigger girls there.   Overall the collection was ok.  One thing I noticed is that the camera people there like to use lots of the upward shooting type angles with the camera near the floor.  Almost every video has it, many of them are exclusively shot from that angle.   I just don't think it's a good angle.   You don't  get a good view of anything from that angle, not even the legs, somehow curiously enough.  It's like standing on the sidewalk and looking up the side of a tall building.  You hardly get an idea of what the building really looks like.  You're too close, too low, and it's a perspective that at least my mind has trouble comprehending.

Give me those girls shot from a wide variety of angles, Muscle Angels would be great.  As it stands, not so much.             
« first < prev Page 1 of 1 next > last »