Log in | Register
« first < prev Page 2 of 356 next > last »
4 days ago - context

I think it's a variety of reasons but I think most of the women on this site are probably lesbian or bisexual and are here for the same reason as me. maybe there are one or a few women that are into femdom and are here to check what men want. and women who want to promote only fans or other services

cgsweat
4 days ago - context

Obviously it's just a hypothetical since we don't have a large enough female userbase to poll, so we'll just have to settle for schmoe responses of what we think the reason(s) are. 😉

I'll allow multiple answers here, but try to keep it to just 2 or 3 please.

4 days ago - context

That's what it looks like when a man tries to pass himself off as a woman. The way to really do it would be to observe the actual patterns of speech, tones and attitudes of real women and then replicate that, word-for-word, thinking every step of the way. But it's not natural and there's no fun in it.

The way they actually do it is they try to "feel her" or their fantasy about her and then put that feeling into words. This inevitably makes the supposed woman sound dumber and more seductive.

Right on Zarkle!

4 days ago - context

I wonder if someone posted content from her OF. Either way, I doubt if this was her decision.

Agreed. It may not have even been OF content, but the company finding her pictures (free notwithstanding) of her outside her socials and paid/subscription sites like HerBiceps and automatically flagging this site.

I guess if someone really wanted to they could reach out to her and ask her what happened, but something tells me she has little incentive to go through the trouble of reaching out here (or having a manager do it lol) to remove herself from the blasklist.

4 days ago - context

Her management is weird. That response seems like a knee-jerk satire.

That's what it looks like when a man tries to pass himself off as a woman. The way to really do it would be to observe the actual patterns of speech, tones and attitudes of real women and then replicate that, word-for-word, thinking every step of the way. But it's not natural and there's no fun in it.

The way they actually do it is they try to "feel her" or their fantasy about her and then put that feeling into words. This inevitably makes the supposed woman sound dumber and more seductive.

4 days ago - context

I'm not surprised. When she exploded in popularity and her OF became clearly managed, I saw it as an upcoming sign that her content wouldn't be long for this site.

It was hilarious, though, when her manager, er, I mean she, replied to a thread that had complaints towards her OF pricing and content.

Edit: Here is the comment. https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/forum/thread/... . It was last active on the day that the account was registered LOL

Her management is weird. That response seems like a knee-jerk satire.

4 days ago - context

I wonder how she managed to explode on the scene in the first place.

There are lots of girls doing what she did but what made her so successful?

I guess chaturbate + pretty face that seems to not match the body + maybe a bit of luck.

4 days ago - context

I wonder how she managed to explode on the scene in the first place.

There are lots of girls doing what she did but what made her so successful?

4 days ago - context

It is what it is.

4 days ago - context

Wow this is big news. Not unexpected

4 days ago - context

It seems a single profile, Sydney Smith, is currently conflating three different women: one brown-eyed brunette and two blue-eyed blondes. I wanted to ask whether the site currently has any system for differentiating the three? Is there no other method but the one brought up by OP, i.e. [Name (ig_handle)]? Is there something wrong with that method, since OP faced the problem of the IG handles being rejected?

4 days ago - context

No hate but I don't find her that special. She's just ok like many others to my eyes so I don't get the whole hype around her.

4 days ago - context

I'm glad she's gone from this site because I can't stand her or her sycophants. Especially can't stand her manager lol.

4 days ago - context

the company sounds like they kind of company that sells iPhones and adidas clothes on the market for 2$

4 days ago - context

the bigger they are they harder they fall

4 days ago - context

I wonder if someone posted content from her OF. Either way, I doubt if this was her decision.

4 days ago - edited 4 days ago - context

There are six "Gracie" VODs on Her Biceps, FWIW.

5 days ago - edited 5 days ago - context

I'm not surprised. When she exploded in popularity and her OF became clearly managed, I saw it as an upcoming sign that her content wouldn't be long for this site.

It was hilarious, though, when her manager, er, I mean she, replied to a thread that had complaints towards her OF pricing and content.

Edit: Here is the comment. https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/forum/thread/... . It was last active on the day that the account was registered LOL

5 days ago - context

Her choice. But it's not a big loss if you ask me.

5 days ago - context

No choice Chainer. Oh well...

Chainer
5 days ago - context

It was a DMCA takedown request submitted by an "onlyfans content protection" firm known as Bruqi OÜ.

Of course reviewing/discussing her content is still fine. (Trying to uncover her real name is not.)

5 days ago - context

Her older uploads are a little meh but she’s posted better quality stuff lately. The tan thing is literally in the list Of things that are discouraged not sure you read the rules

There are more blurry pictures an low quality postage stamps I can't count them all.

« first < prev Page 2 of 356 next > last »