I've been around girlswithmuscle for years. I think there is a place for "tall" tag for girls who are over 180cm(5'11).
The height and the length of limbs, torso affects how the muscles look and develop. It would be a useful tag for which truthfulness is easy to manage.
There isn't really a good way to answer this using objectivity. Any image merge in this regard can be debatable, but some merges would be more obvious than others. The bottom line is that we prefer all images have relevance to this site, and so the less relevant the image is, the more likely it is to be merged or deleted.
The factors to be considered are:
Relevance (is there visible muscle on display, and is she doing something related in that regard, such as flexing, posing, lifting, etc.?)
Quality (in all merges we favor quality, and so an image that isn't poorly cropped and is significantly higher in quality than a less cropped duplicate will win the merge)
B&W vs Color (color is usually favored, however this goes hand in hand with Quality and so a poor quality color image will lose to a higher quality B&W image... although the difference in quality would need to be to a larger than typical degree)
There is no rule against having family in the photo, and so there isn't much of a reason to crop them out. But I would avoid uploading such images even if you do decide to crop them out because again, we prefer images that have more relevance to the site. Some users like to upload anything and everything of certain women just because "the image exists, therefore I must upload it." We don't want that.
This site strives for quality more so than quantity. That said, "before and after" (or transformation/progress) images can quickly become a dime a dozen, especially when one or both pics being used are already on this site. So if you decide to upload a before/after image, know that it has a higher chance of being merged or deleted if:
One or more pics being used are from a paysite, involve nudity, or involve minors (if she is under 18 in either pic, it will be deleted). In other words, the same general upload rules still apply here.
All pics being used in the image are already on the site in higher quality.
That said, sometimes a user will upload an image where the before pic is unique (not previously featured on this site) but the after pic is already on this site. For these images, I will overlook them if it happens to be an objectively good comparison (she is posing roughly the same way in both pics, and there is not too much of a difference in perspective). An example of this would be:
The "after" pic does exist on the site in higher quality, but (to my knowledge) the "before" pic has never been uploaded. Of course, anyone is welcome to send in an image report if they do find evidence to the contrary.
These same principles also apply to images comparing 2 different women (separate pics being used in the same image). Some users seem to really enjoy creating these, and that's fine. However I will say that these are more suitable for the forum rather than the main site. As I write this, I know of more than one thread dedicated to comparisons/transformations, so you are more than welcome to upload these images there.
If I see a posted image that could do with a crop (eg\; removing husbands/partners/children out of a group shot)
and obviously saving without noticeable loss of quality (I know the debate about saving as PNG etc )
Is this permitted to potentially replace an existing image?
I was trying to answer a question a user on this site had. By accident, I clicked on the report button. I usually feel comfortable typing my answers and questions on girlswithmuscle.com through my desktop computer. My desktop computer wasn't working well for the past few days. So in that case, I had to use my mobile device to reply to any of the user's questions and/or comments.
EDIT: I have heard that she is Swedish, but does she actually reside in Sweden? Or is she like Samantha Jerring, who is a Swede but living in the US?
No, Melinda still lives is Sweden.
On June 6, she and her family celebrated National Day of Sweden.
Her pics are pretty sunny, so I assume she has moved to the us. I think most gwm swedes I know are in the us. Sarah Blackman, Pauline Nordin, Sophie Arvebrink, Samantha Herring etc
I see one reason why Melindas photos more sunny.
She moved from Sundsvall to Gothenburg
Speaking of which, I'd like to publicly thank Chainer for changing the color of the report button, should make it a bit easier on both us and the users. Fewer people accidentally clicking Report when they meant to Quote, etc.
She's at 990 subscribers now and will likely break 1,000 in a few days. She (as of this moment) has 293 uploads to her name since the special date.
This would place her 27th on the Most Subscribed list (actually 28th if you include Ariel Rose, who is at 991), and #5 on the least number of uploads list. Her average subscriber gain per upload is 3.38, which would place her 8th on that list.
EDIT: I have heard that she is Swedish, but does she actually reside in Sweden? Or is she like Samantha Jerring, who is a Swede but living in the US?
Her pics are pretty sunny, so I assume she has moved to the us. I think most gwm swedes I know are in the us. Sarah Blackman, Pauline Nordin, Sophie Arvebrink, Samantha Herring etc
She's at 990 subscribers now and will likely break 1,000 in a few days. She (as of this moment) has 293 uploads to her name since the special date.
This would place her 27th on the Most Subscribed list (actually 28th if you include Ariel Rose, who is at 991), and #5 on the least number of uploads list. Her average subscriber gain per upload is 3.38, which would place her 8th on that list.
EDIT: I have heard that she is Swedish, but does she actually reside in Sweden? Or is she like Samantha Jerring, who is a Swede but living in the US?
I'm not at all surprised to see Slava skyrocket to the top of these rankings. When these started (and even before I started modding) she had basically disappeared from fitness, even before Covid. So that's about three or so years, maybe more. I think her last show was 2018, which is when I last saw her on cam, and I think we've had an influx of users PLUS the addition of the subscription option for uploads.
now that she's back to legit bodybuilding and has regained her look from a few years back and has been posting more often, i expect she'll stay at the top or near it
So there is one more list I'd like to share. This was made from organizing the names by least to most number of images, and comparing the result to their placings in the "Most Subscribers" list. So the two lists being compared are as follows:
By comparing these two lists, we can get a little bit of a better understanding of who will have the highest probability of being one of the most subscribed in the future. The following list will tell us who is more likely to maintain a higher rate of new subscribers per upload as their total number of uploads increases. All I did was simply add the two placings together to get a new value, and then sort that value from smallest to largest. For example, An Da Jeong is placed #3 in the first list, and #19 in the second list. So her value for the next list is 3 + 19, which of course is 22. For those who were tied for the same value, I sorted their names by their placing in the "Most Subscribed" list:
Most likely to maintain their rate of new subscribers per upload:
Obviously anything can change, such as any one of them might suddenly quit, get injured, or get blacklisted. But assuming "all things remain the same" then this is the most likely result.
EDIT: For anyone curious about Ariel Rose, she's currently at 986 subscribers and yet only has 118 uploads since March 15, 2020 (refer to previous comments for this date's significance). That would place her at 27th on the Most Subscribed list, but she would be #1 on the least number of uploads list. This would roughly put her at #15 in the list above with a score of 28. As more is uploaded of her, and if she is able to maintain a good subscriber rate, then this score will decrease, placing her higher on the list.
This will be the final, most accurate set of averages. As I figured, not much changed toward the bottom of the list, but some in the top 15 shifted significantly. The number in bold is the average number of subscribers gained per upload, and the italicized number is how many images have been uploaded under their name since the subscriber system went live:
I might compile all of this data and present it as a table next time, rather than several lists and multiple values bunched together. Hopefully this isn't too hard to read.
replaced previous list of average with this one in the main update
Log in |
Register
https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/forum/thread/...
I've been around girlswithmuscle for years. I think there is a place for "tall" tag for girls who are over 180cm(5'11). The height and the length of limbs, torso affects how the muscles look and develop. It would be a useful tag for which truthfulness is easy to manage.
Wrong thread. Please don't bump an inactive thread with an irrelevant question.
Does anyone know of a torrent site that still allows uploading of videos? I want to share my female bodybuilding collections with everyone.
There isn't really a good way to answer this using objectivity. Any image merge in this regard can be debatable, but some merges would be more obvious than others. The bottom line is that we prefer all images have relevance to this site, and so the less relevant the image is, the more likely it is to be merged or deleted.
The factors to be considered are:
There is no rule against having family in the photo, and so there isn't much of a reason to crop them out. But I would avoid uploading such images even if you do decide to crop them out because again, we prefer images that have more relevance to the site. Some users like to upload anything and everything of certain women just because "the image exists, therefore I must upload it." We don't want that.
This site strives for quality more so than quantity. That said, "before and after" (or transformation/progress) images can quickly become a dime a dozen, especially when one or both pics being used are already on this site. So if you decide to upload a before/after image, know that it has a higher chance of being merged or deleted if:
That said, sometimes a user will upload an image where the before pic is unique (not previously featured on this site) but the after pic is already on this site. For these images, I will overlook them if it happens to be an objectively good comparison (she is posing roughly the same way in both pics, and there is not too much of a difference in perspective). An example of this would be:
The "after" pic does exist on the site in higher quality, but (to my knowledge) the "before" pic has never been uploaded. Of course, anyone is welcome to send in an image report if they do find evidence to the contrary.
These same principles also apply to images comparing 2 different women (separate pics being used in the same image). Some users seem to really enjoy creating these, and that's fine. However I will say that these are more suitable for the forum rather than the main site. As I write this, I know of more than one thread dedicated to comparisons/transformations, so you are more than welcome to upload these images there.
If I see a posted image that could do with a crop (eg\; removing husbands/partners/children out of a group shot) and obviously saving without noticeable loss of quality (I know the debate about saving as PNG etc ) Is this permitted to potentially replace an existing image?
https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/forum/topic/59/
I was trying to answer a question a user on this site had. By accident, I clicked on the report button. I usually feel comfortable typing my answers and questions on girlswithmuscle.com through my desktop computer. My desktop computer wasn't working well for the past few days. So in that case, I had to use my mobile device to reply to any of the user's questions and/or comments.
No, Melinda still lives is Sweden. On June 6, she and her family celebrated National Day of Sweden.
I see one reason why Melindas photos more sunny. She moved from Sundsvall to Gothenburg
Speaking of which, I'd like to publicly thank Chainer for changing the color of the report button, should make it a bit easier on both us and the users. Fewer people accidentally clicking Report when they meant to Quote, etc.
You can't undo a report. We get false reports all the time so it's nothing to worry about.
Hi. I accidentally clicked report when I commented on a user who was asking a question. How do I undo the report?
Her pics are pretty sunny, so I assume she has moved to the us. I think most gwm swedes I know are in the us. Sarah Blackman, Pauline Nordin, Sophie Arvebrink, Samantha Herring etc
Time for an analysis of Melinda Lindmark.
She's at 990 subscribers now and will likely break 1,000 in a few days. She (as of this moment) has 293 uploads to her name since the special date.
This would place her 27th on the Most Subscribed list (actually 28th if you include Ariel Rose, who is at 991), and #5 on the least number of uploads list. Her average subscriber gain per upload is 3.38, which would place her 8th on that list.
EDIT: I have heard that she is Swedish, but does she actually reside in Sweden? Or is she like Samantha Jerring, who is a Swede but living in the US?
If nothing else this is a great lesson on how data can look very different depending on the analysis criteria, thanks
Regular updates every week please! 🤣
Talk about analytics!!! Crazy work CG
I'm not at all surprised to see Slava skyrocket to the top of these rankings. When these started (and even before I started modding) she had basically disappeared from fitness, even before Covid. So that's about three or so years, maybe more. I think her last show was 2018, which is when I last saw her on cam, and I think we've had an influx of users PLUS the addition of the subscription option for uploads.
now that she's back to legit bodybuilding and has regained her look from a few years back and has been posting more often, i expect she'll stay at the top or near it
So there is one more list I'd like to share. This was made from organizing the names by least to most number of images, and comparing the result to their placings in the "Most Subscribers" list. So the two lists being compared are as follows:
==============================================
Most Subscribed:
Total number of images since March 15, 2020 (earliest date user began subscribing):
==============================================
By comparing these two lists, we can get a little bit of a better understanding of who will have the highest probability of being one of the most subscribed in the future. The following list will tell us who is more likely to maintain a higher rate of new subscribers per upload as their total number of uploads increases. All I did was simply add the two placings together to get a new value, and then sort that value from smallest to largest. For example, An Da Jeong is placed #3 in the first list, and #19 in the second list. So her value for the next list is 3 + 19, which of course is 22. For those who were tied for the same value, I sorted their names by their placing in the "Most Subscribed" list:
Most likely to maintain their rate of new subscribers per upload:
Obviously anything can change, such as any one of them might suddenly quit, get injured, or get blacklisted. But assuming "all things remain the same" then this is the most likely result.
EDIT: For anyone curious about Ariel Rose, she's currently at 986 subscribers and yet only has 118 uploads since March 15, 2020 (refer to previous comments for this date's significance). That would place her at 27th on the Most Subscribed list, but she would be #1 on the least number of uploads list. This would roughly put her at #15 in the list above with a score of 28. As more is uploaded of her, and if she is able to maintain a good subscriber rate, then this score will decrease, placing her higher on the list.
This will be the final, most accurate set of averages. As I figured, not much changed toward the bottom of the list, but some in the top 15 shifted significantly. The number in bold is the average number of subscribers gained per upload, and the italicized number is how many images have been uploaded under their name since the subscriber system went live:
I might compile all of this data and present it as a table next time, rather than several lists and multiple values bunched together. Hopefully this isn't too hard to read.
replaced previous list of average with this one in the main update