(174 total votes)
I voted no, but then changed my mind, and abstained from voting. I think the main value they bring is they can introduce some of us to potential borderline cases who might otherwise get drowned in the sea of enhanced models on the site. I think the question of what it is possible for a woman to build naturally is interesting, but the actual conversations these polls elicit are pretty samey, and there is no way to actually confirm what the answer to a given poll actually is.
I think the polls would be improved if they included degrees of doubt. Usually my opinion ranges from "plausibly natty" to "almost certainly enhanced"
EDIT:
Following Chainer, I see no point to the [Woman 1] or [Woman 2] polls. I estimate there are 97,000 models on this site (970 pages of ~100 models). That means there are ~4,704,451,500 potential pairs of models.
I want to ask: does it matter if someone is natty or not?
No, it doesn't matter. We don't get a real answer anyway. In the end, it's all just entertainment. But we all find ourselves wondering from time to time whether an athlete is taking something or not. And here we can tell each other, what we are thinking.
I think the polls would be improved if they included degrees of doubt. Usually my opinion ranges from "plausibly natty" to "almost certainly enhanced"
Thank you. 👍
You think Lizzi is natty??
I do. I don’t think she looks too freakish. It’s not like Hannah Worth, or Joy Meek where the mix of vascularity and size makes them obvious. Lizzi is jacked but she’s not like weirdly vascular like those girls. She’s a girl with big muscles and her cut is going well, so idk I think her physique is achievable natty unlike Hannah worth who has better pecs than most gym dudes lol
Once they post on the Internet, their immediate or ultimate goal is $$$, so they want to keep up with the competition: they use PED's. It's not at all like women at the local gym, the majority of whom are clearly natty, or maybe 5% of the models on GWM. The truth is, a very muscular woman is juiced, unless you wish to believe she has 1 in a million genes. I think these polls are interesting only when the model is borderline, otherwise they're a waste of time. On the other hand, some seem to believe that a woman can't be impressively muscular without using PED's. To them, I'd say they haven't met many female farmers. Farm girls can be incredibly strong and well-muscled, and there ain't no way they're using steroids. Not nearly as muscular as a Ms. Olympia, but ripped enough to put an out-of-shape guy to shame.
Women claiming to be natty when glaringly (or later shown by test to be) juiced up, need to be exposed.
Virtually no male BB'er in the top ranks and a long way beyond claims to be unroided today, we ought to have the same honesty from women.
To be fair, when you are a male BB who is an Olympia winner or top competitor, your physique is so freakish that you're not going to convince many people that you aren't on something. But outside of that, you still see a ton of fake male natties especially in the influencer space.
Do you Like this polls? Who should be next?