"Why was this pic deleted?"

Do you mean "you took it yourself" as in you were literally the photographer?

Or that you "took" it from someplace other than WPW, like a third party instagram?

Yes, I was the photographer, and I was not being employed by anyone to take it. I took this photo (and a couple of others I want to post)were taken 20 years ago or so when I met with Michelle Ivers (before she was Brent).

Yes, I was the photographer, and I was not being employed by anyone to take it. I took this photo (and a couple of others I want to post)were taken 20 years ago or so when I met with Michelle Ivers (before she was Brent).

Well you're a rare bird, if you go back to that time with your own pictures - the swimsuit colour is a bit similar to what she wore in some WPW shoots but I am sure they will reinstate .

Well you're a rare bird, if you go back to that time with your own pictures - the swimsuit colour is a bit similar to what she wore in some WPW shoots but I am sure they will reinstate .

Yes, I've been a FBB fan for a very long time. I'm trying to post my personal photos before they are lost to time. Some are too "racy" to post here, but others should be OK. I may try to edit some of the more "adult" ones so that they can be enjoyed by all.

I restored it, it's pretty clearly not from the actual WPW photoset:

She wore the same swimsuit in one, but assuming it's one she owns, that's not too surprising.

Thanks for your uploads of your old photos!

I’ve also added a comment under the photo for future reference.

Sorry for deleting it erroneously.

This one puzzled me after seeing many posts with the same format.

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/images/?comme...

Those are just the ones where the term "car window" is used in the comments; I'm certain there's many more. Is someone actually surprised that a convex mirroring surface doesn't produce a true-to-life reflection?

There is a lot images like that, where they use the car window.

I restored it, it's pretty clearly not from the actual WPW photoset:

She wore the same swimsuit in one, but assuming it's one she owns, that's not too surprising.

Thanks for your uploads of your old photos!

Thank you. I have a couple more SFW ones to post.

Which brings up another question: I had a couple of images deleted because there was a nipple showing. If I obscure it and re-post, is that OK?

Which brings up another question: I had a couple of images deleted because there was a nipple showing. If I obscure it and re-post, is that OK?

You would either need to crop it block it out. Nothing transparent.

OK

Uploading them to an external image-hosting site and linking to them on the NSFW section of the forum might be a better option, since in those cases there would be no other way to see the uncensored originals.

Thank you. I have a couple more SFW ones to post.

Which brings up another question: I had a couple of images deleted because there was a nipple showing. If I obscure it and re-post, is that OK?

I’d also add a note under the image indicating you are the photographer, to avoid confusion.

The nipple thing is borderline and could go either way in moderation, especially given how bad some of the self censorship can be.

tamarok:

I’d also add a note under the image indicating you are the photographer, to avoid confusion.

The nipple thing is borderline and could go either way in moderation, especially given how bad some of the self censorship can be.

Since the photos are his, could he watermark/stamp them with a "Copyright © 2005, original photograph by beowulff. All rights reserved." attribution in the lower right corner?

tamarok:

Since the photos are his, could he watermark/stamp them with a "Copyright © 2005, original photograph by beowulff. All rights reserved." attribution in the lower right corner?

There's loads of pics with copyright watermarks on here, doesn't make much difference to whether they are posted or removed. Just need as indicated by Tamorok, a note when posted that he took them.

Since the photos are his, could he watermark/stamp them with a "Copyright © 2005, original photograph by beowulff. All rights reserved." attribution in the lower right corner?

It's not necessary to make users put the extra effort to apply watermarks. That would be up to him and him alone, and not something we'd impose upon him.

Hi, I uploaded an image, but after it was merged, it disappeared from my uploads page. This isn’t the first time this has happened — sometimes it even seems like some of the images I upload get credited to someone else for no clear reason.

I upload images mostly to keep track of the girls I really like on my profile, but when these changes happen, I lose track of them and it becomes confusing.

I’ve noticed this a few times now — some uploads vanish after being merged, and they no longer appear under my uploads.

By the way, this particular image seems to have been merged with an AI-enhanced version. Is that allowed or permitted on the site?

Could someone please explain why this happens, or if there’s a way to prevent losing my images after a merge?

Honesty I’m a bit surprised of the reason, because literally there’s a lot of pictures in this site that should be deleted for the same reason, I don’t understand it…

Hi, I uploaded an image, but after it was merged, it disappeared from my uploads page. This isn’t the first time this has happened — sometimes it even seems like some of the images I upload get credited to someone else for no clear reason.

I upload images mostly to keep track of the girls I really like on my profile, but when these changes happen, I lose track of them and it becomes confusing.

I’ve noticed this a few times now — some uploads vanish after being merged, and they no longer appear under my uploads.

By the way, this particular image seems to have been merged with an AI-enhanced version. Is that allowed or permitted on the site?

Could someone please explain why this happens, or if there’s a way to prevent losing my images after a merge?

The one kept was of larger size and better quality. Mind you there were 4 other merges into this image. You were really competing with others for this. At least you still have some credit.

Hi, one of my most recent post was deleted because it had no visible muscle, there is a flexing scene near the end where she has visible muscle, also she had visible abs

She is thin with barely defined abs. I had to squint to see them. Not really a GWM.

Alright I agree she doesn't have a defined six packs in the video that I uploaded, but she still had nice 11 abs though. Regardless I have uploaded different videos of her.

Alright I agree she doesn't have a defined six packs in the video that I uploaded, but she still had nice 11 abs though. Regardless I have uploaded different videos of her.

So why repost the same clip that already got rejected for lack of muscle? Do you think you will get a different answer?

@PP1000. Are you having a hard time reading my comment? I said I uploaded another clip with lot more visible muscle

This is the link to the video I uploaded on my second attempt. Clearly her muscle is visible. https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8U2SmW3/ Not sure why it was deleted again.

There are people uploading under celebrity category with far less visible muscle

@PP1000. Are you having a hard time reading my comment? I said I uploaded another clip with lot more visible muscle

This is the link to the video I uploaded on my second attempt. Clearly her muscle is visible. https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8U2SmW3/ Not sure why it was deleted again.

There are people uploading under celebrity category with far less visible muscle

You are the one having a hard time reading. Your clip had no notable muscle. It was deleted by the Mods. You were told why.

You insisted on uploading a second time (reading issues, much?)

It was deleted a second time.

You have now linked to the same clip on TikTok as if that makes her somehow miraculously gain more muscle.

Get the message. It don't belong here.