Forum
>
Site Discussion
>
Thread
Log in |
Register
"hairy armpits" into "hairy armpit"
"sea" into "ocean" (or into something else, because I guess no one can tell the difference)
Might as well include lake also. I think the important dominant feature is a model within (or near) a large body of water. For example, lakeside is not the same as “beach,“ but for tagging here, those are the same things if you ask me.
Any ideas on how to best deal with headscissors, scissors, legs scissors and pillow headscissors? In my opinion the last three tags could be broken up into "bodyscissors" and something like "object scissoring/scissors" because that's basically all they are apart from some that might fit better in crossed legs.
Maybe rename scissors to bodyscissors, pillow headscissors to object scissors, move everything where it belongs and merge the legs scissors content into other tags that fit so that this tag is gone? It's not a lot of uploads I would do it myself if no one is against it.
If we have "male comparison" and "female body comparison", maybe remove "body comparison" and make people choose - "Body comparison" has often always been one of the laziest tags because often it's arbitrarily placed in any casual mixed couple/groups where where is no actual deliberate comparison. There's also "bigger than him/her " for obvious size differences now.
No merge, since it was too generalized and inconsistently applied to merge into any single tag. Images tagged with “veiny arms“ were appropriately tagged with “biceps veins” and sometimes with “delts/shoulder veins” as needed.
I’m starting to wonder if “bigger than him” actually means “male in this image.”
Speaking of letdown tags we are done with...The "biceps" tag is in like every picture's tags to the point where it's meaningless. Also there's an adjacent problem where if you sort no name most favorited you get the same 3 or 4 pictures with absolutely every tag tacked to them making searching by tags useless because what does searching with a tag do if you don't pick a teriary option? It's not like I am looking for a particular person: I'm looking for anyone with x tag and then some other criteria and the only one that hasn't been useless is highest score all time. I swear to God biceps is in every photo. Just remove general muscles that every single person is liable to have just to get on the site?
I started that tag. I've tried before to manage it, but there are too many users living in a fantasy world where every GWM is apparently "bigger" than every male they're pictured with.
At this point I'm done with it.
emasculation is even more abused with projections of some fantasy.
There’s a small class of tags with similar dynamics that could have been useful, but now are used beyond reason.
"overall physique" is another one that is basically applied to almost any figure that is shown without a close up. Not sure how useful it is.
You just hit on how it is useful. It excludes images that are close-ups.
Iceman wrote about the generality of the “biceps“ tag. Same thing: assuming images are tagged correctly, selecting this would exclude images that focus on lower body, or on the back.
In most cases, there will not be a single magic tag to get you every result you want. You will need to experiment with combinations of tags and sorting.
You just hit on how it is useful. It excludes images that are close-ups.
I suppose that one way of looking at it but my instinctive expectation of the tag is that it will show "overall muscularity" ie in more than one body part. which isn't always the case with all wide/middle distance shot figures.
Thanks for doing this. It is a big improvement.