Log in | Register
Forum > Site Discussion > Thread

Why was this image merged?

« first < prev Page 13 of 20 next > last »
May 11, 2025 - permalink

that's fair, thank you for explaining!

May 18, 2025 - edited May 18, 2025 by tamarok - permalink

I want to inquire administrator, those two girls are minors correct, but they wear clothes,not nude,only body comparison. Isn't it ok?

Moderator action: removed image

May 18, 2025 - permalink

No minors, clothed or not.

tamarok
May 18, 2025 - permalink

Its as PP1000 said. Just avoid these sort of images and please don't test the limits.

May 24, 2025 - permalink
May 24, 2025 - permalink
May 24, 2025 - permalink

Have a guess...

Because her head looks shrinked....

tamarok
May 25, 2025 - edited May 25, 2025 - permalink

https://www.instagram.com/muscle_magazine/p/C...

https://www.instagram.com/p/CVFX6kQhWpp/?igsh...

Could someone please explain why this was taken down?

The second one wasn’t merged, it was deleted. Likely because it was morphed for the reasons PP1000 indicated. In fact it has been uploaded 16 times by various people and deleted as morph in each case.

For the first one I’m not seeing any merge. Only a deletion by yourself of a similar image.

Chainer
May 25, 2025 - permalink

Reason for the merge?

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/2527630/

Should have been the other way around since yours is noticeably higher quality. I swapped them.

May 25, 2025 - permalink

Newish to posting but Reason for merge?

I posted first and both images were the same size.

May 25, 2025 - edited May 25, 2025 - permalink

Newish to posting but Reason for merge?

I posted first and both images were the same size.

Then you probably didn't really post first if the other upload was already in the queue. It was uploaded two days ago.

Uploaded: 2025-05-23T13:41:49+01:00 Posted: 2025-05-25T05:50:04+01:00

tamarok
May 26, 2025 - permalink

Newish to posting but Reason for merge?

I posted first and both images were the same size.

They look of the same quality and size, but the one that was kept was uploaded 20 minutes earlier.

May 26, 2025 - permalink

They look of the same quality and size, but the one that was kept was uploaded 20 minutes earlier.

Thank you 🙏🏼

May 26, 2025 - permalink

Reason for the merge?

https://www.girlswithmuscle.com/2527630/

Should have been the other way around since yours is noticeably higher quality. I swapped them.

It should be noted that the other version was less cropped at the bottom which is probably why it was merged into before. But since the higher-res one at least shows all of her calves, I don't have much objection to using that one.

May 29, 2025 - edited May 29, 2025 - permalink

I uploaded a higher quality version of this (2530262) and it got merged into the lower quality version. Could this be reconsidered please? Also, since the uploads are slightly different, it might be better/nice to have both - the highest quality one of Lilli on her own because it's the highest quality and the other one as well because it doesn't have her teammate cropped out. Both versions (uncropped lower quality and cropped higher quality) were posted by Lilli herself in separate posts, neither were edited by the uploader before uploading here.

tamarok
May 30, 2025 - permalink

I uploaded a higher quality version of this (2530262) and it got merged into the lower quality version. Could this be reconsidered please? Also, since the uploads are slightly different, it might be better/nice to have both - the highest quality one of Lilli on her own because it's the highest quality and the other one as well because it doesn't have her teammate cropped out. Both versions (uncropped lower quality and cropped higher quality) were posted by Lilli herself in separate posts, neither were edited by the uploader before uploading here.

From what I see, yours was a cropped version of this one. Since both models are showing muscle, it made sense to prioritise the uncropped version. As for keeping them both, I'd need to see with the other mods. As for being cropped or not cropped by the uploader, that doesn't really factor in

May 30, 2025 - permalink

From what I see, yours was a cropped version of this one. Since both models are showing muscle, it made sense to prioritise the uncropped version. As for keeping them both, I'd need to see with the other mods. As for being cropped or not cropped by the uploader, that doesn't really factor in

Totally understand, I know this is a bit of an edge case. When there's a good argument to keep both, in this case quality vs cropping where there's not a version out there online that is uncropped and higher quality, then it'd be nice and wouldn't hurt anything to have both in my opinion.

mrt
Jun 01, 2025 - permalink
Deleted by mrt
Jun 03, 2025 - edited Jun 03, 2025 - permalink

What happened here? Why my post was it deleted and not merged? Why my name isn't in the post??

PS: and yeah, I know the quality is better and this is the reason, but... I repeat: why was it deleted and not merged?

Jun 03, 2025 - permalink

Just wondering why this one was merged as I uploaded first (checked the image number to make sure)

Jun 03, 2025 - permalink

Just wondering why this one was merged as I uploaded first (checked the image number to make sure)

Since you are still listed as second it's most likely higher res won out

Jun 04, 2025 - permalink

Why was this one taken from me?

Jun 05, 2025 - permalink

Why was this one taken from me?

I have the same problem with one photo of Julia Caceres. I mean... why my credit was taken?? I can undestand that other user posted a photo with better quality, but why my name isn't on the post?

Jun 05, 2025 - edited Jun 05, 2025 - permalink

What happened here? Why my post was it deleted and not merged? Why my name isn't in the post??

PS: and yeah, I know the quality is better and this is the reason, but... I repeat: why was it deleted and not merged?

 

Why was this one taken from me?

 

In both of those cases your versions were merged and not deleted. Not sure why your names aren't showing as one of the uploaders, you'll have to ask Chainer as to whether it's a bug or something intentional.

Chainer
Jun 05, 2025 - permalink

It's intentional if the one that was kept was uploaded first. In that case, all you did with your later (merged) upload is create work for people who reported it and staff who merged it, so I don't see why you'd deserve credit for it.

« first < prev Page 13 of 20 next > last »