Forum
>
General / Nonfiction
>
Thread
Log in |
Register
> When you see women with biceps larger than the ordinary dude, it's almost laughable to think otherwise.
She doesn't have bigger biceps than an ordinary dude, unless this ordinary dude is 150 cm tall.
Her peaks belie your opinion. I'm still willing to bet she has taken something but so what.
Of course, let's be real. Yes, many ladies put in the hard work and most are on something. No biggie and no disrespect, just a fact and so what. Why do people fall over themselves in denial?
Yes take a few riod monsters as example and make it the the rule for every one
Happens so often "Oh you workout and compete so you must take something " Just stupid Otherwhise " You be pro dancer . This explains your shape " 2 diferent prejustice for same person Negative and positive just based because of thinking about the extremes at FBB
Someone's nerve has been touched.
Look, I think people can tell in most cases whether someone is taking something. Whether they do or not, as `I said, is no biggie. And I'm not detracting from the work that someone does whether they juice or not.
But keeping to the topic of the thread, yes, I'd still be willing to bet the woman here in focus takes some drug.
And you, of course, know for sure she hasn't. Meh, ok, viva la difference!
Lets be real many people here hsve complexes and try to hide behind "she takes soething " comments
Just disrespecting the hard work many ladies put in
?? No..it's just a logical observation and having done the fitness gym thing and dabbled in PED's a bit myself. Why get so cut up over it? Who cares if she took a bit of anavar for that transformation or not? All I'm saying is it was likely. Which if you a had a clue .... you'd know..
It's a question of probabilities. If you/re going to get a fair idea let's start with her stats. Anyone know or can estimate what her height is, how much she weighs and what's her body fat percentage? From that we can work out the chances of her being that way without drugs...
I'm just wondering... in your opinion, what are the signs in Louise's case that point to anavar usage (or PEDs in general)?
Ignore Liesbeth she's obviously jus butthurt over who knows what and has 0 clue. Ahh the slightly capped delts are an obvious one. IE she didn't jus lose weight in the transformation she made a noticeable over improvement on one of the most common places that PED's over enhance. And the overall lean look...but without decreasing much in size? And lastly...a tiny anavar dose can do wonders for women with basically 0 side effects - it's easy to take etc etc.
Sure it could just be a really long timeline and be natural..and can be done natural. 'm simply weighing the odds/likelihood of either
Let's see.
Round thick shoulders: Check (This is the most obvious muscle too look for juicing evidence because it's incredibly hard to make it thick the natural way, it tends to stay lean. On the contrary shoulders grow very easy on steroids)
Every other muscle on her body got thickness to it: Check
She's a famous fitness chick: Check
She surely has been juicing at some point like 99% of the fitness community, no question about it.
"yes, many ladies put in the hard work and most are on something...." Good thing this....individual....deleted his/her account. Otherwise, inquiring minds could be asking how many women were personally interviewed in order to arrive at that conclusion "most are on something."
"all I'm saying is it was likely. Which, if you had a clue, you'd know." Now we have the putdown and dismissal of anyone who thinks this athlete isn't on 'roids.
Insulting another user does not pass the bar for bumping a 5 month old thread.
At this point the bar is something like, (hypothetically) "She made a post that she's on X and here is the link", you know, something that brings something new to the table.
The before/after pic almost csrtainly has some anavar involved. Lets be real