Jen Selter wishes she had that body!
she just keeps getting better
Nothing wrong with regular rice consumption.
I think I see two?!
Perhaps not too Beefy, but certainly Curvy. Certainly highly desirable of the, "Girl Next Door" variety. Would be proud to be seen arm-in-arm with this fine lady. Hell, I am allowed to dream, right?
This girl is fine, but do not have the muscles to enter in GWM.
OK,D,she's a fit girl,and they have their place. She could probably still squeeze the air out of your lungs with her thighs.
No... It's just skinny. These are powerful legs:http://www.girlswithmuscle.com/521497/Gracyanne...
OK,D. Well,they're not really skinny,they have shape. Probably in the lower 10% of women on GWM. I really would volunteer to have her test her thighs on any part of my body she'd wish to squeeze. She's in the lower minor leagues of thigh squeezers,but she is damned pretty.
I do not deny it's nice, but in GWM girls should have a developed muscles.
It's that variety is the spice of life. You want muscular bovine thighs,but tell me you wouldn't get up close and personal,given the chance?
I still like women like this, but do not stimulate me as much as a muscular girl. But beyond my tastes, the GWM's girls would have to be muscular...
Rice is Nice
DobleAgente: FYI-GWM doesn't allow just ANY girl to be featured on this site...there's a long list of qualifications they have to meet to get passed thru by the Mods who run and own GWM. How u can say this fitness beauty doesn't belong after looking at all her amazing pics is blatant ignorance to me. Aardvaark nailed it that "variety is the spice of life". 105 Favs and a 9.44 rating to date speaks volumes my friend.
The moderation system does not evaluate models, evaluate photos. The photos go one by one and are given a "YES" or "NO" according to the rules of moderation.
If a photo does not satisfy the rules of moderation should not enter, regardless of whether the model has some interesting photos or be popular.
There is a rule specifying that the girls must show muscle. This girl is fine, but does not show biceps, abs or glutes.
Rice is Nice. :)
There is also a rule saying the girls shouldn't be showing signs of steroid abuse...are you saying that all the girls on your favorites list are all natural? Live and let live, already.
There are photos that do not meet the rules of moderation. But that does not mean you should not say that this picture also breach the rules.
One problem there is that in the photos of FBB, if someone says "this girl takes steroids," nobody denies that. If there are comments in defense of the girl, but nobody tries to deny the obvious.
No clutch, if in a picture with a random skinny someone says "this girl does not show muscles" start raining excuses: "It is not muscular, but it is fit"; "It does not show muscle, but from the shappe is deducted..."; "on this photo does not, but this one..."; etc.
to the favs she goes!lol
Rear view = Best view.
Better than Jen selter
I agree DobleAgente, I wouldn't have submitted her picture for the site, but to some guys, that's the kind and amount of muscle they want to see.The site's for everyone of all tastes in women, that's why when I post, It's not just my ideal women, but any woman I find that has any amount of muscle that I think some guys might like. And I post their names so that if someone is into a particular woman, they can search for more, immediately on their own.